Search results

It is very clearly the end of the OLD priesthood, as plenty of other Hebrews passages prove. Christ Himself is our High Priest. It isn't the end of "the priesthood", but the beginning of His everlasting priesthood—in the order of Melchizedek, who ministered with bread and wine. We are all...

He was a former murder and therefore chief of sinners by his own words. === Plausible. Is it plausible that there are no longer genetically distinguishable tribes, even with modern D.N.A. analysis, but instead there are two very large genetic types, and a third major genetic type (Mizrahim)...

The Assyrian exile decimated the 10 northern tribes. Where is it now.

Which He did once, with the Flood, and He promised to not do it again. With water anyway. He'll burn it all down with fire one day, but He's not going to wash it all away with water again, He promised, and the rainbow in the sky is the reminder of that promise.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/matt-walsh-enrages-demyoucrats-by-crashing-dnc-in-disguise/ar-AA1pbAgk

It's literally the post right above you. Acts 20:16-18; 28

https://theologyonline.com/threads/idolatry.59717/

So don't feel so bad.

Remember that authority and power are synonyms. It's easy to confuse "authoritative" with authority or having authority in terms of power, but this is a category error if you get confused in the ambiguity. Power is something a president or a court or a legislature has and wields, the written...

[Pulled from another thread, I think this is the better location:] Great. Catholicism requires a lifelong commitment, people should know that in case they don't. You are committing like you commit when you get married, it's for life, you're making a promise. It is a promise to change your...

Seth Moulton is a Marine, like JD Vance. The one branch of the military which focuses exclusively on administering God's wrath. The United States Marine Corps is small enough to do this, the other branches are just so big that they do have a lot more administrative work to be done, which is...

You all think it matters what you think but it doesn't, and I'm not saying this because you haven't even attempted to prove this implied claim of yours that it needs to make sense to you or else you're not converting, that's never ever been any part of the faith, and I'll prove it: Show me one...

It's like Nick says, "Free will" is redundant. Also, this is still (trivially) true:

Non-responsive.

It ... addresses the OP, like you asked for. And that's just begging the question. In contrast, I could say, I have no reason to reject Paul as the author of Hebrews, because Hebrews and all of Paul's undisputed letters lines up with Catholicism. You see that's just begging the question.

That is the claim, yes. Absolutely, and I'm claiming the language does NOT seem all that different me. How do you figure out whose READING of the Bible is correct? What's your test?

Again, non-responsive. What makes "RCC" or Arianism anti-Biblical, according to you? You can't and won't say, because you're going to rule out MAD too. Fact.

It's all about Paul and whether he wrote Hebrews, and using evidence internal to the New Testament, and whether the undisputed Pauline letters corroborate the content of the book of Hebrews. Such as when Paul says he received, in 1st Corinthians chapter 11 and 15. He received. That's like...

We're not discussing Arianism. We're discussing anti-Biblicalism, which was YOUR idea to discuss it. Why, according to you, are Arianism and "RCC" anti-Biblical? Let's see if MAD passes your own test? for what is anti-Biblical? If you can.

You'll forgive people then for being confused about good works for the Christian and how important they are. Right? Because Paul, who you all constantly remind us is our only Apostle, constantly reminds us over and over again, just like all the whole rest of the Bible, to watch what we do, to...