Paul was NEVER under Peter's authority

Idolater

Popetard
Then after fourteen years I went up again to Jerusalem with Barnabas, and also took Titus with me. And I went up by revelation, and communicated to them that gospel which I preach among the Gentiles, but privately to those who were of reputation, lest by any means I might run, or had run, in vain. Yet not even Titus who was with me, being a Greek, was compelled to be circumcised. And this occurred because of false brethren secretly brought in (who came in by stealth to spy out our liberty which we have in Christ Jesus, that they might bring us into bondage), to whom we did not yield submission even for an hour, that the truth of the gospel might continue with you.

But from those who seemed to be something—whatever they were, it makes no difference to me; God shows personal favoritism to no man—for those who seemed to be something added nothing to me. But on the contrary, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcised (gentiles) had been committed to me, as the gospel of the circumcised (Jews) was to Peter (for He who worked effectively in Peter for the apostleship to the circumcised also worked effectively in me toward the Gentiles), 9 and when James, Cephas, and John, who seemed to be pillars, perceived the grace that had been given to me, they gave me and Barnabas the right hand of fellowship, that we should go to the Gentiles and they to the circumcised. They desired only that we should remember the poor, the very thing which I also was eager to do.

Luke also records this in Acts 15. Those who seemed to be something added nothing to me. I think this is why hardliner catholics that defend the Papacy hate Paul so much. And "Pentecostals" for that matter. It is a gut punch to the 12 and their mission.

I couldn't "hate Paul" any less; I love Paul. I have no reason to "hate Paul".

$$ Lu 24:25-27
Then he said unto them, O fools, and slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have spoken:
Ought not Christ to have suffered these things, and to enter into his glory?
And beginning at Moses and all the prophets, he expounded unto them in all the scriptures the things concerning himself.
 

Right Divider

Body part
I couldn't "hate Paul" any less; I love Paul. I have no reason to "hate Paul".
That's very cool... since Paul completely disproves the RC's claim that Peter is singularly supreme.
$$ Lu 24:25-27
Then he said unto them, O fools, and slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have spoken:
Ought not Christ to have suffered these things, and to enter into his glory?
And beginning at Moses and all the prophets, he expounded unto them in all the scriptures the things concerning himself.
What... exactly... does that have to do with Paul?
 

Idolater

Popetard
That's very cool... since Paul completely disproves the RC's claim that Peter is singularly supreme.

Peter occupied an office that is singularly supreme, Peter the man wasn't. His office is the vicariate of the throne of David, Christ's throne. He had the right as vicar of Christ (like a prime minister) to wield the papacy's power. The keys of the kingdom of Heaven, the power to bind and loose.

What... exactly... does that have to do with Paul?

That's where Jesus explains the Gospel.
 

Nick M

Fully Semi-Automatic
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
$$ Lu 24:25-27
Then he said unto them, O fools, and slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have spoken:
Ought not Christ to have suffered these things, and to enter into his glory?
And beginning at Moses and all the prophets, he expounded unto them in all the scriptures the things concerning himself.
Is it money to you? What is the point of your scripture out of context and not germane to the discussion?
 
Last edited:

Right Divider

Body part
Peter occupied an office that is singularly supreme,
That is FALSE.

2Cor 11:5 (AKJV/PCE)​
(11:5) For I suppose I was not a whit behind the very chiefest apostles.
2Cor 12:11 (AKJV/PCE)​
(12:11) I am become a fool in glorying; ye have compelled me: for I ought to have been commended of you: for in nothing am I behind the very chiefest apostles, though I be nothing.​

Paul had just as much authority as Peter. Peter disappears from the book of Acts about half way through. There is an obvious reason for that.

There was a reason that Peter, Jame, and John limited their ministry once they understood the revelation given exclusively to Paul.

Gal 2:6-9 (AKJV/PCE)​
(2:6) But of these who seemed to be somewhat, (whatsoever they were, it maketh no matter to me: God accepteth no man's person:) for they who seemed [to be somewhat] in conference added nothing to me: (2:7) But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as [the gospel] of the circumcision [was] unto Peter; (2:8) (For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles:) (2:9) And when James, Cephas, and John, who seemed to be pillars, perceived the grace that was given unto me, they gave to me and Barnabas the right hands of fellowship; that we [should go] unto the heathen, and they unto the circumcision.

Peter and the other Israelite apostles agree to limit their ministry to ISRAEL (i.e., the circumcision).
Peter the man wasn't. His office is the vicariate of the throne of David, Christ's throne.
Absolute nonsense... an invention of the devil to claim a false authority.
He had the right as vicar of Christ (like a prime minister) to wield the papacy's power.
Nope... scripture proves that point FALSE.

Where is Peter in Acts 16-28? (Hint: gone).
The keys of the kingdom of Heaven, the power to bind and loose.
That kingdom has been postponed. Israel is FALLEN.

I guess that your Bible is missing some pages.
That's where Jesus explains the Gospel.
Not the gospel of the grace of God which had not yet been given.

Your Biblical illiteracy is common to all of Catholicism.
 

Nick M

Fully Semi-Automatic
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
From Luke's second letter to Theophilus, called Acts of the Apostles. This is long, but you should have read and studied it. I know many have. This is critical. This is what they clearly got wrong at the later councils by mixing the 2 gospels together. Where Peter and James agree with Paul and say do not do it. James with quite the turn around after sending spies.

And certain men came down from Judea and taught the brethren, “Unless you are circumcised according to the custom of Moses, you cannot be saved.” Therefore, when Paul and Barnabas had no small dissension and dispute with them, they determined that Paul and Barnabas and certain others of them should go up to Jerusalem, to the apostles and elders, about this question.

So, being sent on their way by the church, they passed through Phoenicia and Samaria, describing the conversion of the Gentiles; and they caused great joy to all the brethren. And when they had come to Jerusalem, they were received by the church and the apostles and the elders; and they reported all things that God had done with them. But some of the sect of the Pharisees who believed rose up, saying, “It is necessary to circumcise them, and to command them to keep the law of Moses.”

Now the apostles and elders came together to consider this matter. And when there had been much dispute, Peter rose up and said to them: “Men and brethren, you know that a good while ago God chose among us, that by my mouth the Gentiles should hear the word of the gospel and believe. So God, who knows the heart, acknowledged them by giving them the Holy Spirit, just as He did to us, and made no distinction between us and them, purifying their hearts by faith. Now therefore, why do you test God by putting a yoke on the neck of the disciples which neither our fathers nor we were able to bear? But we believe that through the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ we shall be saved in the same manner as they.”

And after they had become silent, James answered, saying, “Men and brethren, listen to me: Simon has declared how God at the first visited the Gentiles to take out of them a people for His name. And with this the words of the prophets agree, just as it is written:

‘After this I will return
And will rebuild the tabernacle of David, which has fallen down;
I will rebuild its ruins,
And I will set it up;
So that the rest of mankind may seek the Lord,
Even all the Gentiles who are called by My name,
Says the Lord who does all these things.’

“Known to God from eternity are all His works. Therefore I judge that we should not trouble those from among the Gentiles who are turning to God,


Luke is effectively issuing a report. Paul was not under their authority. And those that did not agree later had Paul put in prison. James, Peter, and John were not put in prison.
 
Top