Recent content by JudgeRightly

I notice you didn't actually answer the question that RD asked. Are you not able to do so? You sound like a Jehovah's Witness fresh out of the Watchtower. If you've come here to "teach," you will very quickly find that no one here will be willing to listen. However, if you've come here to...

That would explain why.

I don't get it...

And this stupidity is why you will remain on ignore!

Having a discussion on Open Theism in a discord server I'm in. This is nearing the end of the conversation, or at least, that's what it feels like. I appreciate your succinctness. Just for that reason alone? If so, then if all I do is show you that prophecy is not future settled history...

I'm 18 minutes into this video with Nick Freitas who's interviewing Tom Bilyeu, and finding it incredibly relevant to this post of yours.

Santa Maria, not "Holy Mary" And it wasn't the only ship. There was also the Niña and the Pinta as well.

The site you linked to did not answer the question I asked you to answer. Which you still have not answered, arguably because you cannot, because it's not physically possible for plates to subduct. You're on a discussion forum, refusing to discuss.... And telling me to "man up"? Me asking...

Avajs, it's fine to just say, "I don't know how giant plates of rock can subduct." No one will fault you for that But refusing to answer a direct question, on a forum which you signed up to participate on, just shows you to be dishonest. You say "I trust the science" but can't back up your...

Nothing on that page explains HOW a 10-60 mile thick layer of rock can subduct. It merely assumes that that is what happens, and expects you to just believe it. Don't bring politics into this. This is the science forum on TOL. Please answer the question yourself, this time, if you cannot find...

Bump for @Avajs in case you missed it.

Yeah, but I like keeping things short and to the point where possible.

Laws of Logic: Law of Non-Contradiction. "For any given proposition, the proposition and its negation cannot both be simultaneously true." Therefore AT LEAST ONE of us is wrong. The difference is that I have presented a sound explanation of the events, one that fits not just the biblical...