Recent content by JudgeRightly

It may be a vanity project, but there's at least good reasons for it.

$400M is probably justified. Having foreign dignitaries and US leaders protected during events in the modern era is not a light undertaking. Add onto that fact that it needs to meet certain building standards for historic preservation demands just increases the cost.

Now ask it if the passage could be using Lucifer's fall in the Garden of Eden to describe the coming fall of the king of Tyre. Betcha you won't. I'm going to address this as a single piece: "Science" cannot discover something that isn't true. The Big Bang is an anti-God "solution" (for lack...

"Get Out of the Matrix"?

The only thing I have issue with is "long before Genesis 3," and I'm guessing it was just a typo on your part...

Try reading beyond one or two verses, and not just after them. Moreover the word of the LORD came to me, saying, “Son of man, take up a lamentation for the king of Tyre, and say to him, ‘Thus says the Lord GOD:“You were the seal of perfection, Full of wisdom and perfect in beauty. You were in...

Try Ezekiel.

You mean like repealing the NFA (pro-2ndAmend), deporting foreign invaders, protecting our borders... Those american values? Fair. So you can't answer a hypothetical? Unfortunately, I think you're misconstruing what happened. Yes, people voted blue. I'm not denying that. It wasn't...

No. Asking you to provide biblical support for a claim you're making is not an argument from silence. And that isn't even the argument being presented. We've provided positive arguments demonstrating why exhaustive, infallible foreknowledge is incompatible with libertarian free will. You're...

Ah, yeah, now I see that. You're right. Sorry @Idolater. Guess my brain wasn't firing on all cylinders from how late it was. In my defence, though, you probably could have worded it a bit better. But it's my bad. That doesn't follow. Whether something happened a millisecond ago or a thousand...

This is why you don't "vote for the lesser of two evils."

Here, let me simplify the sentence for you, so that it's easier for you to be confronted by the truth: "Every man who . . . seeks the truth and does the will of God in accordance with his understanding of it, can be saved." "Every man who . . . does [something] in accordance with his...

The argument succeeds because every premise is true. If God infallibly knows X, then X. Not-X is not possible. If men can act freely, then God cannot know their future choices infallibly, because to do so would be a contradiction. Contradictions are false!

You believe that God is not able to bring things to pass because He has great power and knowledge? Good grief! And you say you believe the Bible!

No, the argument is SPECIFICALLY about INFALLIBLE foreknowledge. I don't remember if w2g posted the link to the article the argument comes from, but in case he didn't, you may read it here at your earliest convenience: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/free-will-foreknowledge/ From section...