Recent content by JudgeRightly

Now ask the left that same question about their socialist policies. Man I love it when a leftist stumbles backwards into irrefutable reality.

And there it is. You establish a standard. You insist that people be held to it. You speak in terms of accusation, guilt, and judgment according to that standard. And you still don't understand why I'm calling you a legalist. I already told you what love is: Love is the commitment to the...

Before reading the following post, consider the Boltzmann Brain problem. In its simplest form, the problem asks what would follow if all of your apparent experiences, memories, perceptions, and beliefs about an external world could be generated by a single brain, without that world actually...

... 🤔 💡 No one has charged you with a crime, Idolater. We've called you a legalist. And your second sentence is a tu quoque fallacy. Whether your accuser is guilty of the same thing has no bearing whatsoever on whether you are guilty of it. But since you've just laid down a rule by which...

Go read this post (and perhaps a few of the previous posts, if you need context). https://theologyonline.com/threads/the-plain-reading-of-scripture.61755/post-1930631 ... Done? Good. Now apply it to this conversation. Use the same definition of legalism (and legalist) that everyone in the...

7s! o/

Blind defense? When's the last time I defended Trump blindly? I don't like defending Trump. He's not a good man. But when I hear nothing but vitriol for him simply because he opposes a few evil things and makes the left mad, I can see that many of the attacks against him are undeserved, and so...

My question was about what Clete said. What Vlad said after my post was not included. But good job, you fulfilled Vlad's (and my and Clete's) prediction perfectly! Good girl! :)

It has been over a year since this post. @annabenedetti anything you'd like to say?

This tells me that you don't know what legalism is. Or what love is. Or the difference between the two.

That's nice. They're certainly educated. But "unbiased" and "free-thinkers"? And "free society"? Doubtful.

I'm sure they're just perfect for you guys. XD

You're always welcome here in Missouri.

Um... No. The police should be the ones upholding the law. In a just criminal justice system, you wouldn't need female officers, even for pat-downs, because if the officer assaults her, he will likely see justice, and if the female bears false witness against him, she will suffer the same...

You can't (or won't, rather) read either.