Recent content by JudgeRightly

  1. JudgeRightly

    Let's try something new: Do we agree on anything?

    Ever read Acts 1-7? It was working, at least initially. This is literally the plot of the Bible. Israel was always meant to be a spokes-nation to the world. God had spokesmen (prophets), and tried to scale up. Acts shows that it didn't work. So God went to plan B, a mystery kept secret from...
  2. JudgeRightly

    I Lived Through Collapse. America Is Already There.

    4A is for unreasonable search and seizure. Going door to door is neither. Citizens can refuse to identify, but the moment they step outside, they're fair game. They don't have to answer the door, nor do they have to answer questions. And again, foreigners here in the US are required by FEDERAL...
  3. JudgeRightly

    What Happens to the Severely Backslidden Christian?

    I'm reminded of Pharaoh hardening his heart. Scripture says God hardened his heart, but it's not like God had a spiritual hardening agent that He sprinkled on the mans heart. It was the man's commitment to rebellion in the face of God. In that way, God hardened his heart. I think in the same...
  4. JudgeRightly

    The New York Times; Feighk and Gheigh

    Feighk and Gheigh => fake and gay
  5. JudgeRightly

    The New York Times; Feighk and Gheigh

    There are no words missing from what I said. It was a challenge. "Guess what it has brought."
  6. JudgeRightly

    Let's try something new: Do we agree on anything?

    It makes little sense for it to be done that way, and the only reason to keep holding to that idea is a commitment to the belief that they all preached the same thing. It makes far more sense for it to be a change in dispensations, where the leadership of the former is not aptly suitable for...
  7. JudgeRightly

    Let's try something new: Do we agree on anything?

    12 people to one nation and a smattering of people in various places, vs one person to the entire rest of the known world? Rather poorly divided up, if you ask me... extremely inefficient.
  8. JudgeRightly

    I Lived Through Collapse. America Is Already There.

    She can't even form an intelligent sentence. How could she be right? This is an incredibly one-sided framing of the situation. Going door to door is not unconstitutional. ICE's target population is "non-citizens," who are required by Federal Law to carry identification on them at all times...
  9. JudgeRightly

    ICE agent shoots a driver.

    Anything but just conceding that you're wrong, huh? Fine. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/cbs-news/ "Mostly factual." Meaning they're probably not lying about the agent suffering internal bleeding. Perhaps because it wasn't factual? Having someone who likes Trump doesn't make them...
  10. JudgeRightly

    ICE agent shoots a driver.

    CBS News is a hostile witness here to the government. They're a left-leaning broadcast network, yet they published an article confirming what the government said about the agent. That lends tremendous credence to their story. They could have put the Trump administration on blast, calling them...
  11. JudgeRightly

    ICE agent shoots a driver.

    You didn't watch the video, did you? Shame, shame, shame. This is why no one cares what you think anymore, Anna.
  12. JudgeRightly

    Ukraine is a WWIII powder keg

    Yes. Yes. No. Maybe. I could understand arguments for, but there are still arguments against it that need to be addressed first before considering. No. Japan is for Japanese. No. Same as Japan. South Korea is for South Koreans. No. Not even for Lego. No. No. Definitely no...
  13. JudgeRightly

    ICE agent shoots a driver.

    Apparently the agent suffered internal bleeding following being struck, according to CBS News (3 independent confirmations). You can continue to deny it all you want, @annabenedetti, but the shoot was completely justified.
  14. JudgeRightly

    Let's try something new: Do we agree on anything?

    Are you claiming that "of the uncircumcision" and "of the circumcision" are really saying the same thing? Because "gospel of the uncircumcision" "just as" "of the circumcision" seems pretty clearto me that it's describing two different things. So they have to share the same outfit? Of course...
  15. JudgeRightly

    Let's try something new: Do we agree on anything?

    Denying it doesn't make it false, Derf. I presented the verse from an interlinear. Paul said he was entrusted with the gospel of the uncircumcision, in the same way Peter was entrusted with the circumcision. Meaning, they were both entrusted with a gospel. Or are you asserting that Peter was...
Top