Recent content by JudgeRightly

I'm not seeing how it bookends Paul's letter. (Maybe you're seeing something I'm not?) Matthew 4:15-16 is quoting Isaiah 9:1-2, and Matthew explicitly says that what happened was in fulfillment of what Isaiah had prophesied. So the sequence is: Isaiah prophesied it → Christ fulfilled it...

Okay, so, look up "install with options" and "Shizuku," and apkmirror.com. You may be able to install newer apps on the device... I personally use an abandonware keyboard on the latest version of android, which android refused to let me install, that IWO and shizuku let me get around. An llm...

You can still sideload apps, yes?

Just need him to address the energy of the material being ejected from Earth, but this should give a much clearer idea of things.

Incorrect. Logic and reason says if God has exhaustive infallible foreknowledge we don't have free will. Because it's true. Open Theism affirms this logical truth. You do not affirm this logical truth. That makes you wrong. Notice that you're still just repeating yourself, instead of...

Can we at least get to Thanksgiving first? XD You realize that Matthew 4 is written about events that occurred long before Paul wrote 1 Corinthians, and that 1 Corinthians was written long before 1 John was written... Right?

Define what you mean by "God does not know the future." Do you mean that he knows nothing at all about anything in the future? Or do you mean that He does not exhaustively know every future free choice as an already settled fact? Those are two very different claims. Open Theism does not...

That's nice, but it's not a valid argument against Open Theism. At best it's your personal opinion. At worst it's an appeal to ridicule fallacy or an appeal to emotion fallacy. If you're offering your feeling that Open Theism is "strange" as evidence against it, then you're appealing to...

New video from Bryan Nickel!

That's too broad. There was no public evidence that Iran had decided to build a bomb or was about to launch a nuclear attack. But Iran was enriching uranium to 60%, which is near weapons-grade. By June 2025 it had accumulated about 440.9 kg of uranium enriched to that level, enough that, if...

Iran having nukes is bad, m'kaaay? And regardless of whether they were also making drugs there too, drugs produced by terrorists and/or hostile regimes are bad too.

That's too absolute a claim. U.S. intelligence did not publicly establish that Iran was about to launch an imminent attack when the war began, but that is not the same as Iran posing no threat. Iran still had enrichment capability, ballistic missiles, regional armed partners, and other military...

Both?

Not anymore they aren't, at least not to the extent they were. Because Trump frequently uses hyperbole and superlatives when describing his accomplishments. The fact remains that the strikes badly damaged Iran's nuclear infrastructure and set its program back. “Obliterated” was Trump being...

I'm not talking about humans, except partially.