Recent content by Idolater

There is. And it's in Enyart's proposal—though implicitly (according to my understanding of JR's description). It's that, all that rogue king's subjects disobey and otherwise ignore him, when he orders them to sin/commit a crime. That's it. No civil war needed. Just patience. He's got to die...

The man mansplains what the woman meant but bungled.

Mansplaining exists for a purpose. It is because it is needed. That's on you girls, not us. We're just cleaning up your mess.

Clete still has me on ignore so he doesn't mean me when he says, "no one has said a syllable that has brought a single inch away from the conviction". Again this is all according to my understanding of what JR's been saying Enyart's proposal is. Part of the precondition for Enyart's proposed...

Cool. You didn't have to post it. ofc when you publish you open your content up to scrutiny. Those are the rules. But I explain below what I was doing and why. That's basically what I said, viz. "since you bring Catholicism back into the conversation". Important to note while the whole...

We have a huge law enforcement problem in this country with people thinking disobeying police is the right default move when dealing with police. No, your default should be to obey them; cooperate. Subordinate yourself. They represent our law, but with arms and feet. Defying them is not just...

A woman cop needs to deal with female criminals. It's inappropriate for a man to deal with them. Ideally anyway.

The Eucharist is home, in a way that St. Peter's, supposing hypothetically for the sake of argument, if St. Peter's has not the true Eucharist, St. Peter's is decidedly not home by comparison. The Lord is truly present in any Mass. He is home. So long as the Eucharist is in St. Peter's, it's...

Weighty.

It's one thing to have me on ignore, and quite another to prove that you didn't even read JR's post; because it's clear that Enyart's proposal includes not only a written constitution but a condition under which the constitution functions; namely, that the polity asserts their freedom of...

https://x.com/RadicalCath/status/2074873773363167459?s=20

Under Enyart's proposal¹ the freedom of conscience is defended. Your hypothetical tyrant isn't an impossibility, but his potency is. No one would have to obey an immoral order, ever. So he could scream and holler at anybody to obey his criminal decrees, but nobody has to listen to him when...

Awesome. Sign me up. Oh I'm already signed up. Awesome.

Heard on the internet: “ Jack Smith says when he’s a prosecutor in a courtroom, “it’s not about politics." “ He’s making this case on the well-known non-political network MSNOW to well-known non-political anchor Nicolle Wallace. ”

Sex scenes are fan service (which is a disgusting and accurate term I've had the misfortune of discovering by accident one day). Include nudity, "gratuitous" or otherwise, in that same bucket. Think Titanic and the Godfather. It's just base fan service and it's disgusting.