I'm Starting To Like This Trump Fellow

[Arthur Brain]

What does that have to do with anything? What are you talking about?



If you call that unhinged, I'm curious what word's available for when you run into actual unhinged behavior.



obv a regime and not a civilization. We knew that when he first said it, he didn't mean glass all of Iran, which is how people who take him literally misread him, when they merely need to take him seriously. He meant regime.



Islamism's always been an existential threat to modern human life. Sometimes the center of Islamism's in Iraq, sometimes Afghanistan, sometimes Iran; rn it happens to be Iran; so, you have to go in and take out their legs every once in a while, and make sure they at least stay put and keep their hands to themselves.

You have to do that every so often with existential threats Arthur, I mean, short of glassing the region, you have to go and take their legs out. Or else they're going to rise up, like they have literally always done from their inception, and try to kill you and take away everything you love.

Yeah, I'd call a profanity laden rant, threatening to wipe out a civilization a tad unhinged for sure, and don't try to 'water down' what he said, he did not say "regime", nor did he mean it. You have read his Easter message, right?

"Tuesday will be Power Plant Day, and Bridge Day, all wrapped up in one, in Iran. There will be nothing like it!!! Open the ------’ Strait, you crazy --------, or you’ll be living in Hell - JUST WATCH! Praise be to Allah,"

^There it is sans expletives. Now, targeting civilian infrastructure is a war crime, as I'm sure you're aware and so far, where it's come to the regime, then what has his war managed to achieve other than replacing one set of hardline radicals with another? Along with getting the Strait of Homuz shut in the first place?

Frankly, I'm surprised at you defending Trump given his meltdown against the current pope...

 

[Arthur Brain]

I don't think you understand the concept of total warfare and why its sometimes a good thing.

So spare us your outrage.

Sometimes civilizations have to be wiped out, because of how evil they are.

And sometimes just threatening such is enough to get what you want.

And Trump is nothing if not a master of getting what he wants through such extreme tactics.

He didn't get Greenland. He didn't get Canada. He seemed to think that Iran would just fold over when threatened and that was obviously never going to be the case. What exactly has he accomplished here? If he hadn't started this Epstein Files deflection to start with, the strait of Hormuz wouldn't have shut down, American servicemen and women wouldn't have lost their lives and 175 Iranian schoolkids would still be alive because an American Tomahawk missile wouldn't have struck their school.

 

[ok doser]

 

[annabenedetti]

So God engaged in evil acts when He commanded His people to engage in total war against certain other nations?

Do you think God is commanding the U.S. to commit genocide in Iran?

 

[annabenedetti]

He didn't get Greenland. He didn't get Canada. He seemed to think that Iran would just fold over when threatened and that was obviously never going to be the case. What exactly has he accomplished here? If he hadn't started this Epstein Files deflection to start with, the strait of Hormuz wouldn't have shut down, American servicemen and women wouldn't have lost their lives and 175 Iranian schoolkids would still be alive because an American Tomahawk missile wouldn't have struck their school.

Exactly.

 

[JudgeRightly]

Do you think God is commanding the U.S. to commit genocide in Iran?

How does this help your case?

If something is "not good," either God who did that thing is not good, or your standard is in error, regardless of the answer to your question.

So answer mine. Did God commit evil when He commanded Israel to destroy His enemies utterly? (ie, total war)

 

[annabenedetti]

How does this help your case?

If something is "not good," either God who did that thing is not good, or your standard is in error, regardless of the answer to your question.

So answer mine. Did God commit evil when He commanded Israel to destroy His enemies utterly? (ie, total war)

Because you're presuming to know what God wants by advocating for a complete genocide of a civilization.

 

[Nick M]

Recently I have fallen out of favor with those that call me a Nazi. Like Trump, I am a Nazi, Jew puppet and n*****. You can't make this stuff up. Today I was told he doesn't like Trump because he is not Hitler. I'm not sure how the Orthodox (Russian asset) fits into all of it.

 

[commonsense]

And Trump is nothing if not a master of getting what he wants through such extreme tactics.

He wants an historically low approval rating? Even many former sycophants are breaking with him.

 

[Arthur Brain]

Because you're presuming to know what God wants by advocating for a complete genocide of a civilization.

And unless anyone is bonkers enough to think Trump is a spokesperson for God then his empty, petulant threat can be dismissed as just that. Thanks to that orange clown, the strait of Hormuz is no longer free to use and might well shut down again...

 

[Arthur Brain]

He wants an historically low approval rating? Even many former sycophants are breaking with him.

Oh, but that's all FAKE NEWS!!!!

 

[ok doser]

 

[JudgeRightly]

Because you're presuming to know what God wants by advocating for a complete genocide of a civilization.

You won't answer the question because either answer undermines your position.

Was God evil for commanding the death of entire nations, including the "innocent"?

If you answer yes, you're calling God evil for something He did.
If you answer no, it validates my claim, that there sometimes total warfare is a good thing.

Whether or not I know, or presume to, what God wanted is just a red herring to avoid answering my question.

The fact is that He did, in fact, call for the extermination of certain groups. Either He was evil for doing so or He wasn't. My claim does not care about the reason why something is done, only whether it is evil to do so or not.

One more try:

Anna, was God evil for commanding His people, the Children of Israel, to wipe out certain nations down to every last man, woman, and child? (Which is what we call total war)

 

[ok doser]

Because you're presuming to know what God wants by advocating for a complete genocide of a civilization.

Trump never said genocide.

Trump said: a "whole civilization will die tonight"

Retards on the left interpreted that as "I'm going to kill 93 million people"
Some retards on the left interpreted that as "I'm going to nuke them"

I interpreted that as "the bastard civilization that replaced the Iranian civilization 47 years ago and has been holding it hostage under the guise of Islamic extremism is going to die"

And I'm okay with that.

I'm okay with killing every single Muslim in Iran.

And I'll bet you an awful lot of Iranians feel the same way.

 

[commonsense]

I'm okay with killing every single Muslim in Iran.

And I'll bet you an awful lot of Iranians feel the same way.

What?!?....What?!?....

 

[JudgeRightly]

What?!?....What?!?....

 

[Idolater]

Yeah, I'd call a profanity laden rant, threatening to wipe out a civilization a tad unhinged for sure

You must be so sheltered. I've seen unhinged behavior and it's not coming outta the president especially on social media, you've got to be wingnut bonkers to use that word unhinged when talking basically about someone's tweeting. "Unhinged" lol.

I just ran into an unhinged man the other day. He should probably legit be confined somewhere, but instead he's out in public. smh. But no, nothing the president's ever said, done, or tweeted, has ever been "unhinged" lol.

This is called alarmism, if we're being sophisticated, and just plain exaggerating and hyperbole if we're not.

I don't have to call you unhinged for saying a tweet is unhinged because that'd be too on the nose.

, and don't try to 'water down' what he said, he did not say "regime", nor did he mean it.

Especially in hindsight, with now a lot more information and context, for you to say this, is unhinged.

You have read his Easter message, right?

"Tuesday will be Power Plant Day, and Bridge Day, all wrapped up in one, in Iran. There will be nothing like it!!! Open the ------’ Strait, you crazy --------, or you’ll be living in Hell - JUST WATCH! Praise be to Allah,"

^There it is sans expletives. Now, targeting civilian infrastructure is a war crime, as I'm sure you're aware

Did he target civilian infrastructure Arthur?

and so far, where it's come to the regime, then what has his war managed to achieve other than replacing one set of hardline radicals with another? Along with getting the Strait of Homuz shut in the first place?

An obv change of subject and moving of goalposts.
You don't have to answer this allegation, I'm just pointing it out for the readers.

Frankly, I'm surprised at you defending Trump given his meltdown against the current pope...

They're two different offices.
They're not allowed to comment on what the other is doing?
Throughout history popes and heads of state have bickered and quarreled and disagreed and even criticized one another.
The only problem is if one of them has the other one at gunpoint. That particular scenario has only ever gone one way and never the other.

 

[Idolater]

You seem to like saying that word. Along with onanism. You protest too much. Very odd.

A couple blurred images in the background in a music video, and you were all over it. Did you stop the video to carefully examine the blurring for accuracy? I was too busy watching the drums and guitar to even notice them, but you, ever watchful for temptation to "onanism" - you were Johnny on the spot! Well done, you!

You're gross.
Stop posting smut.

Now that we've addressed that diversionary tactic which had nothing to do with Trump's genocidal threats:

Trump said: "A whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again" and you claimed he only meant the regime.

What regime? I thought he killed them all, including those he planned to put in place of Khamenei. Oops.

Do you not understand that offices can persist even if they're currently unoccupied? Are you so preoccupied with posting smut and accusing men who call you out on it as being wankers, that you fail to understand this?

 

[Arthur Brain]

You must be so sheltered. I've seen unhinged behavior and it's not coming outta the president especially on social media, you've got to be wingnut bonkers to use that word unhinged when talking basically about someone's tweeting. "Unhinged" lol.

I just ran into an unhinged man the other day. He should probably legit be confined somewhere, but instead he's out in public. smh. But no, nothing the president's ever said, done, or tweeted, has ever been "unhinged" lol.

This is called alarmism, if we're being sophisticated, and just plain exaggerating and hyperbole if we're not.

I don't have to call you unhinged for saying a tweet is unhinged because that'd be too on the nose.



Especially in hindsight, with now a lot more information and context, for you to say this, is unhinged.



Did he target civilian infrastructure Arthur?



An obv change of subject and moving of goalposts.
You don't have to answer this allegation, I'm just pointing it out for the readers.



They're two different offices.
They're not allowed to comment on what the other is doing?
Throughout history popes and heads of state have bickered and quarreled and disagreed and even criticized one another.
The only problem is if one of them has the other one at gunpoint. That particular scenario has only ever gone one way and never the other.

Sheltered? Nah, I just recognize an unhinged, demented loon when I see one. You still see an emperor with clothes on...

 

[Arthur Brain]

You're gross.
Stop posting smut.



Do you not understand that offices can persist even if they're currently unoccupied? Are you so preoccupied with posting smut and accusing men who call you out on it as being wankers, that you fail to understand this?

Man, you must be sheltered or something...