Right Divider
Body part
Are you accusing someone of using logical fallacies?
If so, make the case!
Can a Christian lose their salvation
- Thread starter Bright Raven
- Start date
If so, make the case!
I would like to see which arguments are logical fallacies. It would be helpful in your debate if you pointed out which of his arguments are logical fallacies.
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
Why is it funny to you that you cannot respond rationally to what I wrote in the post to which you have just reacted?
You're going to demand I call your fallacious thinking, "logical"?
You've addressed nothing from my post. And you've no hope of responding rationally to anything I have written in it, because you cherish your irrational thinking.
Calling questions "absurd" that you can't answer about your own, self-defeating ravings does you no good, does it?
I already invited you to lay out for us whatever "case" you imagine you have against what I've stated:
Why can't you do that? Reacting by merely saying mechanically that I'm "taking a very illogical position" is you failing to rise to that challenge, and is you showing that I am not wrong in regarding you as a poser.
Right Divider
Body part
I could not agree more. The use of vague allegations and accusation here is very annoying (and happens all of the time).
If people would actually make a case, we could have a sensible discussion.
Look at his posts. It's a series of one insult after another. And some of them are vicious. The name calling is off the charts in rudeness.
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
What "insult(s)" are you referring to?
You'd consider calling someone who distributes poison, "poison distributor", to be a vicious thing to do?
Which names do you not like, and why? Why don't you stop being a poser and start coughing up specifics?
Cite Please.
LIar, stupid, God hater, suitcase full of crack cocaine, your sin-degenerated mind despises logic, and relishes your incoherence, so that you are vainly proud of yourself for your self-contradiction., your stupidity about Elijah. That enough for you? The entire tone of his posts is derogatory.
Yes. There is no need to insult someone just because they believe differently than you do. It doesn't strengthen your position. Look at Derf. He's one of the best around at defending his beliefs and he never insults anyone.
Right Divider
Body part
Which part was not true?
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
None of it. Differences in opinion do not mean anyone has that list of attributes. That includes non Christians as we know they are deceived. Being deceived is not a crime and insulting people never will persuade a person to change their minds. I grew up abused and I am living proof abuse doesn't convert anyone to your point of view. It pushed me to reject listening to God. And the more abuse is leveled at someone the farther we push them away from God.
Yes. I don't understand why that was hard to figure out.
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
Correct: None of it was not true.
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
It was hard for you to figure out?
Hilarious. I'm glad you enjoyed it.Correct: None of it was not true.
So long.
Now we getting someplace. I will agree, when someone has to call names, it isn't a very strong way to debate. I am not a very big fan of name calling.
A stronger way to debate would be to cite what is wrong with an argument rather than to resort to name calling.
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
So, according to your hypocrisy, it would be an insult for me to call you "hypocrite", but you somehow give yourself a free pass when you call people whom you consider deceived, "deceived"? You want to hear what your hypocrisy sounds like? Go call someone whom you consider deceived, "deceived", and, if they're anything like you, you'll be able to watch them sit there throwing a tantrum, whining that you have "insulted" them by calling them "deceived".