• This is a new section being rolled out to attract people interested in exploring the origins of the universe and the earth from a biblical perspective. Debate is encouraged and opposing viewpoints are welcome to post but certain rules must be followed. 1. No abusive tagging - if abusive tags are found - they will be deleted and disabled by the Admin team 2. No calling the biblical accounts a fable - fairy tale ect. This is a Christian site, so members that participate here must be respectful in their disagreement.

Q. What do Christians and Darwinists have in common with one another?

Right Divider

Body part
No, science has disproved certain fundamentalist belief systems is all. It's obvious that the universe is a lot older than what you're confined to believe it to be.
So .... there you go... way off topic .... again.

I don't claim to be anything. Certain people who claim to be such think nothing of trolling with all sorts of garbage.
:rotfl:

Between the two of us, you're the only troll.
 

Right Divider

Body part
Because it's incest you dimwit. If they were to reproduce then there'd be a high likelihood of congenital defects. Do you even know what that is?

When there was ONLY one man and one woman and their children... how can incest be avoided?

How were Adam and Eve supposed to "Be fruitful, and multiply"?
 

Right Divider

Body part
I find it ironic that those most likely to rail against sexual immorality are now busy arguing for incest.

AGAIN I ASK....

When there was ONLY one man and one woman and their children... how can incest be avoided?

How were Adam and Eve supposed to "Be fruitful, and multiply"?
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
I find it ironic that those most likely to rail against sexual immorality are now busy arguing for incest.

You appear to be conflating sexual immorality and incest. But you are unable to explain why incest is inherently sexually immoral.

Try to do better
 

annabenedetti

like marbles on glass
You appear to be conflating sexual immorality and incest. But you are unable to explain why incest is inherently sexually immoral.

Try to do better

Deut. 27:22 ‘Cursed is he who lies with his sister, the daughter of his father or of his mother.’ And all the people shall say, ‘Amen.’

As a Bible believer, that should be enough for you, even if your instinctive universal repugnance at the thought is missing.
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
Deut. 27:22 ‘Cursed is he who lies with his sister, the daughter of his father or of his mother.’ And all the people shall say, ‘Amen.’

As a Bible believer, that should be enough for you ...

it is, but shouldn't be for you and artie

and there's no reason to believe it was a law in play before Moses gave it to the Israelites

even if your instinctive universal repugnance at the thought is missing.

the only reason it's present in you is because you were raised Catholic and it's been drilled into you by the nuns

now, that's the fourth time you've dodged the question:


What is inherently wrong about consensual adult siblings getting married?
 

Right Divider

Body part
Deut. 27:22 ‘Cursed is he who lies with his sister, the daughter of his father or of his mother.’ And all the people shall say, ‘Amen.’

As a Bible believer, that should be enough for you, even if your instinctive universal repugnance at the thought is missing.

You telling a Bible believer how they should understand the Bible.... priceless!!
 

Idolater

"Foundation of the World" Dispensationalist χρ
Oh, of course not. I mean, everyone knows fornicating with his sister is on every last man standing's bucket list...
:plain:

Continuing with the admittedly extreme scenario, where there are only two adults left in the whole world. And again, in contrast:

Now let's say that instead of full sibling brother and sister, they are just two unrelated men, two adult men. Only two humans left on earth. Let's say they engage in . . . use your imagination . . . with themselves. Full consent.

Wrong?
 
Top