We are beginning to see results of government response to coronavirus

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
LOL. Once again you show your problems with reading comprehension.

You're blaming Trump for people living at starvation levels and their inability to pay their bills, and all the while supporting the policies that create the economic problems that are making starvation become a large reality in this country. Your reasoning and reading comprehension are so poor you can't even see the dichotomy of supporting two ideas that are mutually opposed to each other. Either that or you're so dishonest that you don't care how schizoid you appear. As long as you think you can have some type of plausibility your happy not matter the dishonesty and irrationality of your thinking really is.

I actually pity you for humiliating yourself like you're doing. You would be miles ahead just being honest.

I'm not blaming Trump for finally implementing lockdown measures and declaring a national emergency apart from not doing it sooner. You're the one with the cognitive dissonance on that score as by rights, you should be criticizing him for that shouldn't you? You obviously don't agree with the steps his administration took?
 

Gary K

New member
Banned
Hmm, Trump was the one who finally declared a national emergency when he couldn't downplay the deaths anymore.

You remember that?

Yeah, the over-hyped, double-counted, fraudulent numbers. Even the CDC now admits that the total death count from the coronavirus alone is around 6% of the published numbers. In other words 94% of published deaths have multiple causes of death: 2.6 average major additional health issues per death. And you want to point to those multiple listed reasons for death as only attributable to the coronavirus. That's just flat out dishonest. It's hilarious that the CDC points to murder, vehicle accidents, industrial accidents, drowning, falling off a roof, etc... as caused by the coronavirus. That's 5,000+ deaths attributed to coronavirus by events that have nothing to do with the coronavirus. It's like if someone came up to you, shot you in the head, and instead of charging someone with murder they attributed your death to the coronavirus. And you argue for that type of double-dipping in death counts. Do you even begin to see how dishonest that scaremongering is? Let alone how dishonest it is to attribute 10s of thousands of deaths caused by other issues to coronvirus alone? You've been manipulated beyond belief and yet you can't understand that. I pity your ignorance, AB.
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Yeah, the over-hyped, double-counted, fraudulent numbers. Even the CDC now admits that the total death count from the coronavirus alone is around 6% of the published numbers. In other words 94% of published deaths have multiple causes of death: 2.6 average major additional health issues per death. And you want to point to those multiple listed reasons for death as only attributable to the coronavirus. That's just flat out dishonest. It's hilarious that the CDC points to murder, vehicle accidents, industrial accidents, drowning, falling off a roof, etc... as caused by the coronavirus. That's 5,000+ deaths attributed to coronavirus by events that have nothing to do with the coronavirus. It's like if someone came up to you, shot you in the head, and instead of charging someone with murder they attributed your death to the coronavirus. And you argue for that type of double-dipping in death counts. Do you even begin to see how dishonest that scaremongering is? Let alone how dishonest it is to attribute 10s of thousands of deaths caused by other issues to coronvirus alone? You've been manipulated beyond belief and yet you can't understand that. I pity your ignorance, AB.

So, did you whine and complain when Trump stopped going on about how the virus was all under control and declared a national emergency and implemented lockdown measures?
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
In Australia if you make a Facebook post criticizing the government's decision on how to handle this nonsense, they'll arrest you. In your pyjamas. While your children watch. And you're pregnant. And they'll send four officers.



https://gizmodo.com/woman-arrested-f...​​​​

Well, you're lucky that doesn't include you then aren't ya? You clearly don't agree with the Trump administration on lockdown measures but you're not going to get hauled off if you make a negative comment on social media about it...

Oh, but social media is just for retards according to you, right? So you couldn't possibly be on it anyway.

My bad.

Oh, hang on, haven't you admitted to posting on facebook and the like? What's with that?

:liberals:
 
Last edited:

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
Well, you're lucky that doesn't include you then aren't ya? You clearly don't agree with the Trump administration on lockdown measures but you're not going to get hauled off if you make a negative comment on social media about it...

Oh, but social media is just for retards according to you, right?. So you couldn't possibly be on it anyway.

My bad.

Yes that's nice

Toddle along now, silly little child :wave2:
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Just for clarification purposes, ok doser stipulates that social media is for retards, so not only is he one himself for using Facebook by his own "standards" but so is the president for using Twitter who he venerates so much.

Ya gotta laugh...
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
Just for clarification purposes, ok doser stipulates that social media is for retards, so not only is he one himself for using Facebook by his own "standards" but so is the president for using Twitter who he venerates so much.

Ya gotta laugh...

Yes that's nice



Toddle along now, silly little child :wave2:
 
Top