Who will face Trump in the election of 2020?
- Thread starter Hobie
- Start date
And yet 100% more competent (and moral) than the criminal that Putin installed in the WH. It simply isn’t a legitimate president.
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
Agree. I voted for her. She was polarizing and that had an effect, yet even so she won the popular vote.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Oh, still completely preferable to the current clown in office no doubt, but still, not much of a choice IMO.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Oh get a grip. Nothing in that briefing was "reasonable" apart from the scathing criticism that ensued afterwards. Even Trumpo tried to backpedal away from his own dumb remarks.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
That's the problem with the voting system in America. She won by three million votes and yet...
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
did you vote for her?
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
correct
what he did was consider possibilities of injecting something inside the body that would act as a disinfectant, that would kill the Kung Flu virus
If he had been talking about a bacterium, anybody with any familiarity with pharmaceuticals would immediately have thought "broad spectrum antibiotic"
:thumb:
that's why I supported him
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
Who did you vote for in 2016 in the American Presidential election?
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
correct
what he did was consider possibilities of injecting something inside the body that would act as a disinfectant, that would kill the Kung Flu virus
If he had been talking about a bacterium, anybody with any familiarity with pharmaceuticals would immediately have thought "broad spectrum antibiotic"
:thumb:
that's why I supported him
Um, no, he suggested the possibility of injecting disinfectant no matter how much you feebly try to justify his nutty remarks. Oh, and UV light but that's not bat crazy either. Poor Dr Birx must have wanted to get out of there ASAP and if, as you say, he was suggesting what you imply, then why didn't he say so after the subsequent backlash instead of lying about being sarcastic?
:think:
The answers obvious. Well, it should be, even for you.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Nobody, obviously.
I would vote for her again.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Yep.
It's a bizarre system...and an unfair one at that.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
He also floated the idea of internal photic therapy, which the retarded Trump haters hooted and howled about like a pack of monkeys flinging their poo.
turns out it's a thing: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6410618/
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
She's umpteen times better than Trump but then, so is a Scotch egg...I'm not a fan of hers at all but that's just personal opinion. I'm not a fan of politicians in general, cynic that I am...
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Pffft, like he had a clue what he was talking about...and again, why did he backtrack away from his lunacy with feeble protestations of sarcasm if he had any genuine point? Why didn't he explain what he meant when the backlash happened?
He could have earned some political brownie points if anything of the sort that you suggest held true. He didn't. He turned tail, threw a hissy fit and tried to shy away from that briefing.
Now why is that?
Even you should know the answer...
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
"He floated the idea of internal photic therapy..." :rotfl: