But which dating method do you rank as the worst, and which of the features of it strike you are particularly lamentable?
Humans don't live for many hundreds of years.
Stuart
-
This is a new section being rolled out to attract people interested in exploring the origins of the universe and the earth from a biblical perspective. Debate is encouraged and opposing viewpoints are welcome to post but certain rules must be followed. 1. No abusive tagging - if abusive tags are found - they will be deleted and disabled by the Admin team 2. No calling the biblical accounts a fable - fairy tale ect. This is a Christian site, so members that participate here must be respectful in their disagreement.
Why Evolution is real science - let's settle this "debate"!
- Thread starter ThisIsMyUserName
- Start date
Stuart
Evidence.
To be part of a sensible discussion.
A consensus is an idea agreed on by the vast majority. Science is an idea that is falsifiable and testable. A "scientific concensus" is a non sequitur.
The evidence.
Right Divider
Body part
The ones with the vivid imagination are the atheist materialists. They actually believe that nothing created everything. That's as ridiculous and as anti-science as it gets.
Last edited:
Right Divider
Body part
Radiometric dating is completely founded upon an incorrect theory of origins. So is the atheistic materialistic world view, so that really comes as no surprise.
And you know this how exactly? Because people TODAY don't live that long? Again you follow fake science.
Your world view does not allow you to see anything but your fake "facts".
Stuu: How do you come to a global flood date of about 4300 years ago?
Stuart
Can you be very specific about exactly how evidence gives the date of a global flood?
Stuart
It's even worse than that. When you add the negative gravitational energy of the inflation of space-time to the positive energy of all the various kinds of energy and matter, you get zero. The scientific conclusion is that, on average, the universe is nothing.
Depending on what you mean by nothing.
Stuart
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
He's an insane troll, indeed.
Notice how he got real quiet toward me ever since I've been asking him elementary questions about the nature of evidence.
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
Yet you say humans have been "evolving" for millions of years. How can humans have been "evolving" for millions of years without living for many hundreds of years?
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
Then why are you making the assumption?
Plus, here, you've just made another assumption; you've just made the assumption that no assumption is needed.
Stuu: But which dating method do you rank as the worst, and which of the features of it strike you are particularly lamentable?
Stuu: Humans don't live for many hundreds of years.
You're the one making the extraordinary claim. Where is your extraordinary evidence?
Stuart
Can you be a bit more specific than that, so I can understand your complaint properly? Are you talking here about the early kinds of radiometric dating, or isochron dating? Can you be more explicit about the importance of a 'theory of origins' when it comes to how radioisotope dating works?
It can be difficult facing the facts. The actual facts, not the religious alt-facts. But once reality is your benchmark, there is beauty in it. I can't see how that could be said for books of talking serpents and impossible wooden boats, unless you are a particular fan of science fiction or historical fiction.
Stuu: Humans don't live for many hundreds of years.
Yes, because people don't live that long today.
You're the one making the extraordinary claim. Where is your extraordinary evidence?
Stuart
I don't understand your question. Adult houseflies only live for about a month but housefly evolution has been going on for as long as mammalian evolution, at least the past 70 million years.
Stuart
I can't remember where, sorry. I'm obviously happy to go with whatever date you wish to claim. But I am interested in how you got it, in detail.
Stuart
Right Divider
Body part
Nothing means nothing. It does NOT mean a balance of positive and negative charges.
Right Divider
Body part
:thumb:
He loves to parrot the atheist talking points, but cannot engage in an intelligent conversion or put two logical thoughts together.
Right Divider
Body part
The idea of radiometric dating is tied to the idea of "the evolution of the solar system". Both are false.
Conflating atheism with reality is fake science.
So you are basing your claim on something that you cannot prove. That's par for the course with you.
This passage is about people like you:
2Pe 3:2-7 KJV That ye may be mindful of the words which were spoken before by the holy prophets, and of the commandment of us the apostles of the Lord and Saviour: (3) Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts, (4) And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation. (5) For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water: (6) Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished: (7) But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.
I didn't make the claim. You made the anti-claim.
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
Then why are you making the assumption?
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
I understand your desire to try to save face for your stupidity by means of your stonewalling.
How can humans have been doing something for millions of years without having lived even for hundreds of years--let alone, for millions of years?
Yet, you say that humans have been "evolving" for millions of years, while yet denying that humans have lived for hundreds--let alone, millions--of years. What stupidity from you.