Creation Science Rules

This is a new section being rolled out to attract people interested in exploring the origins of the universe and the earth from a biblical perspective.
Debate is encouraged and opposing viewpoints are welcome to post but certain rules must be followed.
1. No abusive tagging - if abusive tags are found - they will be deleted and disabled by the Admin team
2. No calling the biblical accounts a fable - fairy tale ect. This is a Christian site, so members that participate here must be respectful in their disagreement.
See more
See less

Why Evolution is real science - let's settle this "debate"!

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by 7djengo7 View Post
    That's as useless and silly a thing for you to say as it would be for you to say, "I recommend that you not misinterpret a lack of motivation to walk on the surface of the sun as a lack of ability to walk on the surface of the sun".
    You may doubt my sun surface walking ability if you wish, but you do so at your own risk.



    • Originally posted by Stuu View Post
      You may doubt my sun surface walking ability if you wish, but you do so at your own risk.

      Oh. Thanks for the warning.
      All my ancestors are human.
      PS: All your ancestors are human.
      PPS: To all you cats, dogs, monkeys, and other assorted house pets whose masters are outsourcing the task of TOL post-writing to you (we know who you are )– you may disregard the PS.


      • Originally posted by Stuu View Post
        Apparently you believe that evolution happens 'within kinds'.
        Why would you say such a ridiculous thing?

        Evolution is the idea that all life is descended by means of random mutations and natural selection from a universal common ancestor. To restrict it to "within kinds" is to posit inanity.

        Do you spend any time at all considering what the opposing point of view is?

        To be an opponent of evolution by natural selection from variations caused by random mutation (and related mechanisms) from common origins you would need to give just as detailed an explanation, with mechanisms and evidence, that explained how it is possible for all variation to be stored up in either two or seven pairs of members of every living species, and then unleashed to give the current distribution and variation we see today, with no evidence at all of a recent genetic bottleneck.
        No, I wouldn't.

        There is no prerequisite needed to oppose an idea. People are free to do that for any or no reason.

        This is just silly games on your part. Try engaging sensibly.

        Are you really an opponent of Darwinism? On the evidence so far I'd say you are just a religious fundamentalist science denier with a desire for alt-facts for your religious lifestyle choice.

        On the other hand you were being successful in the main point of creationism, to get religion taught in US schools, then that would be damaging and I would have to oppose that in solidarity with young people wishing to follow a career in science.
        You seriously have nothing to offer, do you?

        Stay away.
        Where is the evidence for a global flood?
        "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

        "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
        -Bob B.


        • This silly attempt to prove Evolution and Bible are possible is just plain disproved by the simple fact there has never been nor could ever be a single example of evolution found.
          Th eOP has obviously never watched flashflood video and seen the mass of debris a flash flood can displace and carry along until finding a place to drop and sort it hydraulically.
          The video fo the Condit Dam removal shows this perfectly!