Announcement

Collapse

Creation Science Rules

This is a new section being rolled out to attract people interested in exploring the origins of the universe and the earth from a biblical perspective.
Debate is encouraged and opposing viewpoints are welcome to post but certain rules must be followed.
1. No abusive tagging - if abusive tags are found - they will be deleted and disabled by the Admin team
2. No calling the biblical accounts a fable - fairy tale ect. This is a Christian site, so members that participate here must be respectful in their disagreement.
See more
See less

Solar Probe Found Unexplainable Things

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Solar Probe Found Unexplainable Things

    https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/g...e-cant-explain

    When one's model is constantly having issues explaining how things work, maybe the model being used is incorrect, and should be discarded or revised...

  • #2
    https://physicsworld.com/a/nasa-miss...ge-of-the-sun/

    Comment


    • #3
      https://www.popsci.com/story/space/p...first-results/

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by JudgeRightly View Post
        https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/g...e-cant-explain

        When one's model is constantly having issues explaining how things work, maybe the model being used is incorrect, and should be discarded or revised...
        Unless the model is sacred.
        All of my ancestors are human.
        Originally posted by Squeaky
        That explains why your an idiot.
        Originally posted by God's Truth
        Father figure, Son figure, and Holy Spirit figure.
        Col 2:9 (AKJV/PCE)
        (2:9) For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.

        1Tim 4:10 (AKJV/PCE)
        (4:10) For therefore we both labour and suffer reproach, because we trust in the living God, who is the Saviour of all men, specially of those that believe.

        Something that was SPOKEN OF since the world began CANNOT be the SAME thing as something KEPT SECRET since the world began.

        Comment


        • #5
          ...so we’re missing something really fundamental in our standard models of the Sun...
          We don't even have a great understanding of our Sun and yet we are told by some here that we understand how the solar system formed from a dust cloud.
          All of my ancestors are human.
          Originally posted by Squeaky
          That explains why your an idiot.
          Originally posted by God's Truth
          Father figure, Son figure, and Holy Spirit figure.
          Col 2:9 (AKJV/PCE)
          (2:9) For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.

          1Tim 4:10 (AKJV/PCE)
          (4:10) For therefore we both labour and suffer reproach, because we trust in the living God, who is the Saviour of all men, specially of those that believe.

          Something that was SPOKEN OF since the world began CANNOT be the SAME thing as something KEPT SECRET since the world began.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by JudgeRightly View Post
            https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/g...e-cant-explain

            When one's model is constantly having issues explaining how things work, maybe the model being used is incorrect, and should be discarded or revised...


            goodness some difficult science. So do we just say "godditit" and leave it with that? Cause that seems to be your fall back

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Jonahdog View Post

              goodness some difficult science. So do we just say "godditit" and leave it with that? Cause that seems to be your fall back
              That beats your "nothing did it".
              All of my ancestors are human.
              Originally posted by Squeaky
              That explains why your an idiot.
              Originally posted by God's Truth
              Father figure, Son figure, and Holy Spirit figure.
              Col 2:9 (AKJV/PCE)
              (2:9) For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.

              1Tim 4:10 (AKJV/PCE)
              (4:10) For therefore we both labour and suffer reproach, because we trust in the living God, who is the Saviour of all men, specially of those that believe.

              Something that was SPOKEN OF since the world began CANNOT be the SAME thing as something KEPT SECRET since the world began.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Jonahdog View Post
                goodness some difficult science. So do we just say "godditit" and leave it with that? Cause that seems to be your fall back
                You misread the article (if you even read it at all).

                Try again:


                "we’re missing something really fundamental in our standard models of the Sun"





                It's amusing how you instantly start attacking God when the topic of discussion is your own position.

                Knee-jerk reaction much?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by JudgeRightly View Post

                  You misread the article (if you even read it at all).

                  Try again:


                  "we’re missing something really fundamental in our standard models of the Sun"





                  It's amusing how you instantly start attacking God when the topic of discussion is your own position.

                  Knee-jerk reaction much?
                  You mean the article that described new information from recent solar fly bys? The same article that briefly suggested while we all know where the sun is but it is not easy to study in detail etc?
                  The one that actually suggested what you suggested? That further study is needed? Yep that one.
                  You provided a simple binary choice in your first post---further study of throwing out the current model. Scientists are likely to take the first choice. Which is your choice?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Jonahdog View Post
                    You provided a simple binary choice in your first post---further study of throwing out the current model.
                    ​​​​​There was a qualifier statement that you missed or ignored.

                    "When one's model is constantly having issues explaining how things work"

                    Which means that you taking this one instance and treating it as a standalone issue doesn't work for you.

                    The model being used (that the scientists in the article state quite clearly has a fundamental issue) has more problems than just the one we are discussing.

                    It was in THAT CONTEXT that I stated that one should discard or revise the model, instead of trying to force the data to fit the model, or to use ad hoc rescue devices.

                    The current model being used needs to be revised, or discarded and a new model formed.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Jonahdog View Post

                      You mean the article that described new information from recent solar fly bys? The same article that briefly suggested while we all know where the sun is but it is not easy to study in detail etc?
                      The one that actually suggested what you suggested? That further study is needed? Yep that one.
                      You provided a simple binary choice in your first post---further study of throwing out the current model. Scientists are likely to take the first choice. Which is your choice?
                      It's amusing how you instantly start attacking God when the topic of discussion is your own position.

                      Knee-jerk reaction much?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by JudgeRightly View Post

                        ​​​​​There was a qualifier statement that you missed or ignored.

                        "When one's model is constantly having issues explaining how things work"

                        Which means that you taking this one instance and treating it as a standalone issue doesn't work for you.

                        The model being used (that the scientists in the article state quite clearly has a fundamental issue) has more problems than just the one we are discussing.

                        It was in THAT CONTEXT that I stated that one should discard or revise the model, instead of trying to force the data to fit the model, or to use ad hoc rescue devices.

                        The current model being used needs to be revised, or discarded and a new model formed.
                        Simple then, get the crack physicists and cosmologists at Liberty University or the like to come up with the correct scientific model. Win a Nobel. Advance science. Defeat the devil.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Jonahdog View Post
                          Simple then, get the crack physicists and cosmologists at Liberty University or the like to come up with the correct scientific model. Win a Nobel. Advance science. Defeat the devil.


                          You done trolling?

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Right Divider View Post
                            Rather than just posting a link, make a point about the referenced article.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by User Name View Post
                              So you still cannot handle making an actual comment about the article that you posted a link to?
                              All of my ancestors are human.
                              Originally posted by Squeaky
                              That explains why your an idiot.
                              Originally posted by God's Truth
                              Father figure, Son figure, and Holy Spirit figure.
                              Col 2:9 (AKJV/PCE)
                              (2:9) For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.

                              1Tim 4:10 (AKJV/PCE)
                              (4:10) For therefore we both labour and suffer reproach, because we trust in the living God, who is the Saviour of all men, specially of those that believe.

                              Something that was SPOKEN OF since the world began CANNOT be the SAME thing as something KEPT SECRET since the world began.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X