Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Battle Royale XIV discussion thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by drbrumley View Post
    Oops. double post. I can't edit a post in the blue.
    I fixed that for ya. Year of silver on the house.
    Also be sure to.... Join TOL on Facebook | Follow TOL on Twitter
    TOL Newbies CLICK HERE or....upgrade your TOL today!

    Comment


    • #17
      I assume folks recall the 2008 one-on-one with Will and muz:

      http://www.theologyonline.com/forums...ad.php?t=48002
      http://www.theologyonline.com/forums...ad.php?t=48020

      Will likely will raise this inerrancy argument:
      - http://www.theologyonline.com/forums...121#post752121
      - http://www.theologyonline.com/forums...681#post753681

      AMR
      Embedded links in my posts or in my sig below are included for a reason. Tolle Lege.



      Do you confess?
      Founder, Reformed Theology Institute
      AMR's Randomata Blog
      Learn Reformed Doctrine
      I fear explanations explanatory of things explained.
      Christian, catholic, Calvinist, confessional, Presbyterian (PCA).
      Lex orandi, lex credenda: everyone is a Calvinist on their knees.
      The best TOL Social Group: here.
      If your username appears in blue and you have over 500 posts:
      Why?


      Comment


      • #18
        Got to love the tribute to William Shakespere in the text of the original KJV 1611. So inspired by........

        Comment


        • #19
          All we are missing is godrulz in the grandstands. Since he is the king of grandstanding with his posts.
          Jesus saves completely. http://www.climatedepot.com/ http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/

          Titus 1

          For there are many insubordinate, both idle talkers and deceivers, especially those of the circumcision, whose mouths must be stopped

          Ephesians 5

          11 And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them. 12 For it is shameful even to speak of those things which are done by them in secret

          Comment


          • #20
            Looking forward to this as I've never really gotten into the details of this topic before.
            "I believe in Christianity, as I believe the sun has risen, not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else." C.S. Lewis

            "Don't believe that there's nothing that's true, don't believe in this modern machine." Switchfoot

            Comment


            • #21
              And, regardless of the outcome, I will continue to believe every single word of my KJB even when I don't understand it.
              Originally posted by Interplanner
              They can't compete with a real writer and grammar scholar
              Originally posted by Interplanner
              You're too literal to get it.
              Originally posted by Interplanner
              The New Covenant preceded the Old Covenant.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by SaulToPaul View Post
                And, regardless of the outcome, I will continue to believe every single word of my KJB even when I don't understand it.
                Amen!
                2 Timothy 2:15 Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.

                Paul defines the word of truth as the gospel of your salvation (1 Corinthians 15:1-4 KJV, Ephesians 1:13 KJV). Now, study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed by rightly dividing it!

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by SaulToPaul View Post
                  And, regardless of the outcome, I will continue to believe every single word of my KJB even when I don't understand it.
                  I just thought the same thing this morning when I was telling my mom about this debate. I will always stay in the KJV, also no matter what is said or shown. Yesterday actually, is when I thought that because I looked up a list of all Bibles ever, some partial and incomplete then the complete Bibles and manuscripts. KJV is it for me.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    me too

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by patrick jane View Post
                      I just thought the same thing this morning when I was telling my mom about this debate. I will always stay in the KJV, also no matter what is said or shown. Yesterday actually, is when I thought that because I looked up a list of all Bibles ever, some partial and incomplete then the complete Bibles and manuscripts. KJV is it for me.
                      It will never lead you astray, you can rely on it, and believe it.
                      Originally posted by Interplanner
                      They can't compete with a real writer and grammar scholar
                      Originally posted by Interplanner
                      You're too literal to get it.
                      Originally posted by Interplanner
                      The New Covenant preceded the Old Covenant.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by SaulToPaul View Post
                        It will never lead you astray, you can rely on it, and believe it.
                        so who is arguing for what ? is Bob Enyart for KJV only ? Is this debate about only KJB and no other Bible being inspired ?

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by patrick jane View Post
                          so who is arguing for what ? is Bob Enyart for KJV only ? Is this debate about only KJB and no other Bible being inspired ?
                          Will Kinney- for KJB, all others fakes
                          Bob and someone else- against KJB inerrancy
                          Originally posted by Interplanner
                          They can't compete with a real writer and grammar scholar
                          Originally posted by Interplanner
                          You're too literal to get it.
                          Originally posted by Interplanner
                          The New Covenant preceded the Old Covenant.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Whilst I am sure the debate will be interesting, for me it is a foregone conclusion. Having also debated in some detail with a few KJVO members here, and not once received an answer to obvious and straightforward questions, my guess is that quite a number of questions will also remain unanswered even in a debate at this high level.
                            Note that I am in no way against the KJV. The KJV was one of the first Bibles I ever read and the NKJV remains one of my most valued translations. It is the O that is the problem.

                            The arguments against the O are simple and powerful and no amount of detail or logic can overcome them. Indeed, the greatest ploy of KJVOnlyists in my experience has been to make the arguments more complicated than they need be to create a shield against the obvious.
                            Total Misanthropy.
                            Uncertain salvation.
                            Luck of the draw.
                            Irresistible damnation.
                            Persecution of the saints.

                            Time is an illusion; lunchtime doubly so.
                            (The Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy)

                            RevTestament: It doesn't matter to me too much that the "New Testament wasn't written in Hebrew.
                            Dialogos: Calvin, as a sinner, probably got some things wrong.
                            Brandplucked: I'm shocked that other people disagree with me.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by SaulToPaul View Post
                              It will never lead you astray, you can rely on it, and believe it.
                              What is your position on KJO?
                              The state — whatever its particular forms — always expresses itself as a collective form of property ownership. All political systems are socialistic, in that they are premised upon the subservience of individual interests to collective authority. Communism, fascism, lesser forms of state socialism, and welfarism, are all premised upon the state’s usurpation of privately-owned property. Whether one chooses to be aligned with the political "Left," "Right," or "Middle," comes down to nothing more than a preference for a particular franchise of state socialism.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by 1Way1Truth1Life View Post
                                Got to love the tribute to William Shakespere in the text of the original KJV 1611. So inspired by........
                                Not to mention:

                                The 1611 KJV included the Apocrypha.

                                The 1611 KJV contained a list of holy days that included All Saints Day, The Annunciation of the Blessed Virgin, The Purification of the Blessed Virgin, and other Saints days.

                                The 1611 KJV had marginal cross-references to books of the Apocrypha
                                (1 Cor 1:13 KJV) Is Christ divided? was Paul crucified for you? or were ye baptized in the name of Paul?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X