Q Anon

Status
Not open for further replies.

TrumpTrainCA

BANNED
Banned
Maybe, while others say the sheer vastness of Russia would have made it ultimately impossible to hold, with the Nazis routed eventually under nonstop attacks from millions of drunk, ticked-off Russians.

Maybe, assuming the government did not topple after losing its three biggest cities.

I'll take your word on that, it's something I've not heard before.

REALLY? That's the stuff of countless Hollywood movies, and dumbfounded historians too. Hitler was CONVINCED that the invasion would be at Calais and that the Normandy attacks were just a distraction. His generals begged him to move the troops from Calais to Normandy but he refused. In that one decision Hitler lost the war
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
I honor the allied dead and wounded from all nations, fool.

And the Allies did save your island. If Churchill hadn't gone to bat for you, you'd have a taste for really dark beers instead of Fosters.

Not when you come out with half baked soundbites you don't, not in the slightest. The UK was part of the allied front and were fighting against the Nazi threat before the US joined in the struggle.

Oh, and your continual fixation with a certain Australian lager just has to be projection now. Where it comes to real ale then I happen to have a fondness for porters and stouts in the main although I do like certain pales too depending. You wanna think things through a bit more or just cut out the trolling.

Or both preferably...
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Yes, our money and might and arms and weapons and men combined with your scraping on your knees. Your contribution was crumbs compared to ours.

Oh, go take your pompous posturing and ignorance someplace else...You do a huge disservice to America with such garbage, never mind the allied forces in total.
 

musterion

Well-known member
Maybe, assuming the government did not topple after losing its three biggest cities.



REALLY? That's the stuff of countless Hollywood movies, and dumbfounded historians too. Hitler was CONVINCED that the invasion would be at Calais and that the Normandy attacks were just a distraction. His generals begged him to move the troops from Calais to Normandy but he refused. In that one decision Hitler lost the war

No, the Eisenhower being crazy part, I never heard before.
 

musterion

Well-known member
Not when you come out with half baked soundbites you don't, not in the slightest. The UK was part of the allied front and were fighting against the Nazi threat before the US joined in the struggle.

And losing, despite the glorious Battle of Britain. You still needed us, and we came through for you.

Oh, and your continual fixation with a certain Australian lager just has to be projection now. Where it comes to real ale then I happen to have a fondness for porters and stouts in the main although I do like certain pales too depending. You wanna think things through a bit more or just cut out the trolling.

Or both preferably...

Or you could just put me on Ignore, as you've long claimed to do.
 

musterion

Well-known member
Yes, at least once he threatened to.

But if he did that, he couldn't get attention and disrupt discussions he has little if any stake in (this one originally didn't until it took a turn for WW2).
 

Jefferson

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Jerry Nadler (D) Attempting New Blockade Now that Mueller Insurance Policy Expiring

Jerry Nadler (D) Attempting New Blockade Now that Mueller Insurance Policy Expiring

3 Mar 2019 - 1:50:20 PM
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/na...nt-requests-declares-trump-obstructed-justice
When the original 'insurance' policy expires [MUELLER] and you must attempt to 'protect' those in harms way by re_applying BLOCKADE + maintain leftist hatred & FAKE NEWS narrative you………..
Q
 

Jefferson

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
When Do You Play the Trump Card?

When Do You Play the Trump Card?

3 Mar 2019 - 1:52:38 PM
At what stage in the game do you play the TRUMP card?
Q
 

Jefferson

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
This Is a Methodical Plan Moving Ahead Step by Step with Military Precision

This Is a Methodical Plan Moving Ahead Step by Step with Military Precision

3 Mar 2019 - 2:27:22 PM
Why have there been no arrests?
Why have 'specific' dates been mentioned only to see no action?
Define 'game theory'.
Why must disinformation be provided?
Define 'open source'.
Define 'public purview'.
Do we let our enemies walk through the front door?
Define 'plausible deniability'.
Why was it important to FIRST clean house within the FBI & DOJ (public info)?
Why was it important to FIRST clean house within other ABC agencies (non_public info)?
What are the duties of the FBI?
What are the duties of the DOJ?
When does MIL INTEL have jurisdiction?
What vested powers does POTUS have re: MIL INTEL vs. ABC agencies re: matters of NAT SEC (HOMELAND)?
Think 'umbrella surv'.
What agency does the FBI report to?
What is the role of the AG?
Does the AG oversee the firing of FBI & DOJ senior/mid/lower staff?
How many FBI & DOJ were FIRED/FORCED?
Does 'Russia' recusal prevent/block AG from this responsibility?
What time period did this occur?
Who appointed and tasked HUBER?
Who appointed and tasked the OIG?
Who was AG?
[zero leaks - none]
Transfer from AG1 to AG2?
Why might that be important?
How do you avoid 'politically motivated/attack - obstruction - attempt to block/obstruct Mueller'?
Optics are important.
When are optics not important?
Think Whitaker.
Define 'stage set'.
Who recently walked 'on stage' to take command?
What 'stage' experience did this person have?
Think Bill Clinton impeachment.
Has the 'stage' been cleaned & cleared for the next performance?
If the 'stage' is clean, can the performance begin?
How might 'transparency' [DECLAS] fit into the dialogue?
Define 'thesis' statement.
What benefit(s) does this provide BARR?
"This is not simply another four-year election. This is a crossroads in the history of our civilization that will determine whether or not we, the people, reclaim control over our government." - POTUS
Logical thinking.
Q
 

Jefferson

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Treason-Sedition-Corruption at the Highest Levels of Government (World Wide)

Treason-Sedition-Corruption at the Highest Levels of Government (World Wide)

3 Mar 2019 - 2:55:55 PM
Ask yourself a very simple, logical, question.
What is a FISA warrant/application?
Is it a highly confidential [safeguarded] product of the UNITED STATES GOV?
If a product of the US GOV _ how did UK/AUS know what was listed inside of the package?
Think call to POTUS to prevent DECLAS [sources & methods].
If the US GOV requests UK/AUS [+2] to spy [+ campaign insertion] on an AMERICAN PRESIDENTIAL PRE_NOMINEE + POTUS ELECT, is there a CHAIN OF COMMAND to APPROVE such AUTH?
Paper trail of the CHAIN OF COMMAND & umbrella spy metadata?
If not tasked & targeted under FVEY - what legal authority existed to engage the targeting?
Think Nunes' statement "not through normal collection, gathering, and reporting/oversight re: (FVEY)."
Did the dossier provide the 'bulk data' anchor for the spy campaign?
What entity paid for the 'research' dossier?
Opposition candidate?
What US Ally completed the collection of false data?
Why was it important to use sources within the UK vs. US?
How do you circumvent US LAW?
What other 'anchors' were provided to FISC in order to gain the warrant? [DECLAS will show].
Was the 'other' data (collection/process) worse than the dossier?
Why didn't FISC require 'in room' presentations of the data prior to 'sign off'?
Who signed apps 1-4?
Who traveled to UK/AUS post election of POTUS?
Why were SECURITY PRIV removed from select 'formerly active' individuals?
Treason-Sedition-Corruption at the highest levels of GOV (WW).
How do you repair a bridge without closing it down?
Q
 

Jefferson

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
John Huber's Team of Prosecutors Covering a Wide Range of Criminal Activity

John Huber's Team of Prosecutors Covering a Wide Range of Criminal Activity

3 Mar 2019 - 3:31:28 PM
https://www.abc4.com/news/local-new...the-badge-with-utah-s-us-attorneys/1813060694
Sometimes reading between the lines provides…
"Huber says every one of the prosecutors is already handling about twenty cases."
"They range from domestic terrorism to court-authorized wiretaps of criminal organizations to child pedophiles and those who would exploit our children. Criminal aliens. Big fraud schemes."
Q
 

Jefferson

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Unusually High Number of Sealed Indictments

Unusually High Number of Sealed Indictments

3 Mar 2019 - 3:57:33 PM

Anonymous
3 Mar 2019 - 3:49:35 PM
https://cdn.qmap.pub/images/eb226a9748f6fafca7a81506ff23e60b0e12f4f0e0cca8f886dd74f0b4d250c0.jpg
February 2019 Update to #SealedCases
5,832 new 82,324 entered 10/30/17 thru 2/28/19
Avg: 5,145 per month
https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/1iBS4WgngH8u8-wAqhehRIWCVBQKD8-5Y
(sorry, no heat map this month - a couple of our soldiers are down with medical ailments)

Thank you, Anon.
Note: Not all are USA v. [ ]
Nothing to see here.
Q
 

Jefferson

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Fact: Mueller's Scope Memo Was Never Declassified - So How Can D's Claim Knowledge?

Fact: Mueller's Scope Memo Was Never Declassified - So How Can D's Claim Knowledge?

3 Mar 2019 - 4:21:19 PM
https://twitter.com/tedlieu/status/1102227809341181953
Read the comments.
Those still asleep buying the 'narrow' scope 'new narrative' shift.
If the scope memo was never unclassified (v2) how do D's make this statement?
#FactsMatter
Q
 

Jefferson

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
When Will Americans Wake up to the [D] Party Con?

When Will Americans Wake up to the [D] Party Con?

3 Mar 2019 - 6:17:55 PM
https://twitter.com/tedlieu/status/1102265163107971077
More statements made (evidence) without presenting facts.
If 'evidence' exists(ed), under 'broad' scope #1, would Mueller have the auth to pursue?
https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/967231/download
The Special Counsel is authorized to conduct the investigation confinned by then-FBI Director James 8. Corney in testimony before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence on March 20, 2017, including:
(i) any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump; and
(ii) any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation; and
(iii) any other matters within the scope of 28 C.F.R. § 600.4(a).
Because no evidence exists(ed) and/or was found by SC/Mueller, was scope #2 enacted in an attempt to go outside of the 'intended engagement'?
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4429989-Rod-Rosenstein-memo-outlining-scope-of-Mueller.html
Why is scope #2 classified only to AG/DAG and a select few others (read at terminal only)?
If 'evidence' exists(ed), why did R+D members of the Senate conclude NO DIRECT EVIDENCE EXISTS …………..?
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/co...nce-conspiracy-between-trump-campaign-n970536
If 'evidence' exists(ed), as per your statement released today, again, why did the SENATE (R's + D's) JUST CONCLUDE NO EVIDENCE EXISTS?
When will Americans wake up to the [D] party con that is continually pushed without facts, without support, and supported and further pushed by the media arm of the [D] party [FAKE NEWS MEDIA]?
Reading the comments on these Tweets further demonstrates the seriousness of media brainwashing in our Country whereby statements are considered fact w/o the need to provide proof.
Group-Think.
Control of the Narrative.
If enough people state the same thing w/o providing evidence and/or support does it become FACTUAL to those caught in the loop?
NATIONAL CRISIS.
Q
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top