Canada bans 1500 kinds of military style weapons.

Gary K

New member
Banned
Maybe the problem is the crazy people with access to guns, as I explained in the second post on this thread: "The reactionaries among us will obviously decry this attempt to deprive the mentally ill and those who "snap" from having easy access to such weapons."
Yeah, the sick and the lame don't deserve to have the same rights as everyone else. Why not just euthanize them, like Hitler and other despots have done? You're really on the right side of history. Ban guns like the evil despots have done down throughout the history of socialism.
 

Aimiel

Well-known member
Why anyone would have an issue with health care being available for all is anyone's guess.

Only all of the people on the waiting list for a doctor visit, since the under-paid doctors all moved to countries where they can be paid better. :duh:
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
But you average daily deaths by gun is quite high.

and overwhelmingly due to handguns
Spoiler
Spoiler



Number of murder victims in the United States in 2018, by weapon





Canada, New Zealand, the UK and several other countries think differently about who needs to own such guns.

in America that's a conversation the left is unwilling to have, for obvious reasons:
Spoiler
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
So you need a 2-3 shot semi auto rifle.

Sometimes. Sometimes I need more. Usually I only need one. Occasionally I shoot the whole clip (12 shots).


Anyway..... what was the target?

Critters. Or target shooting.


Yes..... we know. Look at the mass killings list.

my semi-auto rifle has never appeared on a mass killings list, unless it was one published by critters.
 

7djengo7

This space intentionally left blank
In a similar reaction to that of New Zealand, Canada has decided that military-type weapons are no longer fit for any civilian use.
[h=3]Trudeau announces ban on 1,500 kinds of assault weapons ...[/h] www.bbc.co.uk › news › world-us-canada-52505765
2 days ago - Canada Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has introduced a long-promised ban on assault-style weapons following the country's worst gun ... [h=3]Canada Bans Assault Weapons in Wake of Deadly Mass ...[/h] www.nytimes.com › 2020/05/01 › world › canada-bans-a...
2 days ago - The ban means that Canadians will no longer be able to own rifles like the AR-15, the military-style weapon used in several mass shootings in the ...

People still own what they own, even when it is stolen (or is attempted to be stolen) from them--whether stolen by common, low-level thieves, or by high-powered Satanist tyrants like your hero, Fidel Trudeau. Guess who never owns any of the weapons stolen--or attempted to be stolen--by your beloved socialist tyrants: your beloved socialist tyrants. Theft is never--and never results in--a transfer of ownership from the owner to the thief.

But, of course, you and your fellow God-despising Satanists are all about violating, and cheering on the violation of, "THOU SHALT NOT STEAL."
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
In a similar reaction to that of New Zealand, Canada has decided that military-type weapons are no longer fit for any civilian use.
[h=3]Trudeau announces ban on 1,500 kinds of assault weapons ...[/h] www.bbc.co.uk › news › world-us-canada-52505765
2 days ago - Canada Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has introduced a long-promised ban on assault-style weapons following the country's worst gun ... [h=3]Canada Bans Assault Weapons in Wake of Deadly Mass ...[/h] www.nytimes.com › 2020/05/01 › world › canada-bans-a...
2 days ago - The ban means that Canadians will no longer be able to own rifles like the AR-15, the military-style weapon used in several mass shootings in the ...

Virtue signalling

If Trudeau REALLY cared about protecting Canadians, he'd ban matches:


[h=1]9 of the 22 victims of the Nova Scotia rampage died in fires set by the gunman, investigators say[/h]


https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/29/americas/nova-scotia-shooting-investigation/index.html

 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
People still own what they own, even when it is stolen (or is attempted to be stolen) from them--whether stolen by common, low-level thieves, or by high-powered Satanist tyrants like your hero, Fidel Trudeau. Guess who never owns any of the weapons stolen--or attempted to be stolen--by your beloved socialist tyrants: your beloved socialist tyrants. Theft is never--and never results in--a transfer of ownership from the owner to the thief.

But, of course, you and your fellow God-despising Satanists are all about violating, and cheering on the violation of, "THOU SHALT NOT STEAL."

Don't forget the whole pillaging and raping doormats and the like.

Otherwise, seriously, grow up and educate yourself some more, a lot more in fact...

:dizzy:
 

eider

Well-known member
Sounds benign, doesn't work in reality. :duh:

We've had one for 70 years now.
And so far it has held up under the immense strain of this pandemic.
At present we go outside every Thursday evening at 8pm and clap for it
 

eider

Well-known member
It's what I expect from you. Your attention span is too short to read for 10 minutes or so. And, this thread is about socialism. Too bad you don't understand that.

No, I certainly don't understand how the common sense of gun control is about Socialism.
That very idea is obtuse I think.
 

eider

Well-known member
Yeah, the sick and the lame don't deserve to have the same rights as everyone else. Why not just euthanize them, like Hitler and other despots have done? You're really on the right side of history. Ban guns like the evil despots have done down throughout the history of socialism.

Hitler was a right wing extremist.

The common sense of some gun controls is apolitical.
I think that you are a tribal rightist in that you can't see the common sense of some 'control'.
Let's face it...... you do like controls when they suit you...... Yes?..... No?
 

eider

Well-known member
Only all of the people on the waiting list for a doctor visit, since the under-paid doctors all moved to countries where they can be paid better. :duh:

You should have an NHS..... really.
In usual times if I have wanted to see a doctor I could telephone or visit the surgery at 8am and I would be given an appointment to see a doctor for that same morning.
During this pandemic it's been even faster and two mornings in a row I have requested an appointment and a doctor has called me back within 2 hours.

The NHS saved my wife in 2014..... a young doctor in Medical Decisions discovered that my wife was a very rare case (5/1 million) of Phaeo Chromo Cytoma (A tumour on an adrenal gland). She was saved by the Phaeo team at Kings College Hospital within a fortnight and now has annual tests. In a country with private hospitals we know for sure that her treatment would have cost us as much as our little home.

You keep your system..... we'll keep ours thankyou.

Oh...... and what do you think of Canada's decision to ban fast fire guns?
 

eider

Well-known member
The guns we own are to protect us from government tyranny, were people like Bernie Sanders to ever be elected.

Oh! I've just arrived at the above gem!
Wonderful! So let's get this right, if a Democrat President would be elected then folks like you would turn your guns on to the police officers, sheriffs, US militia soldiers and American servicemen and women who serve your country at present? You'd kill your own people??

I've heard it all now. Some members on here think that about half the American people are retarded mentals, and you would like to kill your own countrymen and women if they are responding to a democratically elected President who you don't like?

D'you know..... on a mental health check questionnaire I think that could be the very good question.
 

eider

Well-known member
go back and look at what I wrote

Yes! I did! Wonderful...
I use mine for shooting critters, often at the extreme range of my rifle, or in conditions where it's difficult to take a good first shot.

Being able to take a second, third, fourth shot while remaining on target is lot more successful than taking a shot, cycling the next round manually, reaquiring the target through the scope and taking the second shot.

Yes........ you shoot 'critters' at EXTREME range in conditions where it's DIFFICULT to take a good shot.
Amazing.
That could be a good question on a 'sort out the nutters' form for a gun licence.
Thus:- Would you take multiple shots at 'critters' at extreme range where it is difficult to take a shot?
Answer :- NO! No! Absolutely No!
Examiner breaths sigh of relief.....
 

eider

Well-known member
and overwhelmingly due to handguns.
So nearly 30 gun murders each day out of the 80 odd gun deaths per day?
Thre gun accidents/injuries must be very high, I expect.


in America that's a conversation the left is unwilling to have, for obvious reasons:
I get the impression that most mass gun murders are not committed by blacks.
 
Top