Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

This...

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • This...

    http://www.theologyonline.com/forums...&postcount=907

    Is ridiculous. Rusha had you bang to rights. Get a grip CS and don't make bloody stupid threats.
    Well this is fun isn't it?


  • #2
    Originally posted by Arthur Brain View Post
    http://www.theologyonline.com/forums...&postcount=907

    Is ridiculous. Rusha had you bang to rights. Get a grip CS and don't make bloody stupid threats.
    What's ridiculous is Rusha's stalking, and what's ridiculous is your stupid praising her for doing it. You two clowns deserve to suffer some serious consequences for your actions.

    Climate Sanity never claimed to be perfect...nor have I claimed to be perfect, but both of us know what is immoral and what isn't. His scantily dressed girlfriend was not a stripper, and his posting her picture has nothing to do with his recognizing what is right and what is wrong.

    You simpletons call a stripper's BEHAVIOR good. It's BEHAVIOR that makes one DESERVING of consequences. You two "holier than thou" heathens are a joke, and you refuse to shut your big mouths, so you need to be exposed for the libtards you both are.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Arthur Brain View Post
      http://www.theologyonline.com/forums...&postcount=907

      Is ridiculous. Rusha had you bang to rights. Get a grip CS and don't make bloody stupid threats.
      I am just content that that monstrosity of a threat is closed. I don't see any issue with posting responses that are currently available for ANY member to view and decipher on their own.
      A man you can bait with a tweet is not a man
      we can trust with nuclear weapons.

      Bill Clinton






      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Rusha View Post
        I am just content that that monstrosity of a threat is closed. I don't see any issue with posting responses that are currently available for ANY member to view and decipher on their own.
        People getting their just deserts is an excellent thread.

        It's the nonsense you two clowns insisted on bringing into the thread that made it a "monstrosity".

        Comment


        • #5
          ....
          A man you can bait with a tweet is not a man
          we can trust with nuclear weapons.

          Bill Clinton






          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Arthur Brain View Post
            http://www.theologyonline.com/forums...&postcount=907

            Is ridiculous. Rusha had you bang to rights. Get a grip CS and don't make bloody stupid threats.
            I know CS admitted those other identities and I can't believe the shocking and disgusting things he said.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by glorydaz View Post
              What's ridiculous is Rusha's stalking, and what's ridiculous is your stupid praising her for doing it. You two clowns deserve to suffer some serious consequences for your actions.
              She was 'stalking' him in a public thread by providing evidence that blew his opinions out of the water?

              Climate Sanity never claimed to be perfect...nor have I claimed to be perfect, but both of us know what is immoral and what isn't. His scantily dressed girlfriend was not a stripper, and his posting her picture has nothing to do with his recognizing what is right and what is wrong.
              Oh, you do do you? Because as I recall, CS was claiming that dressing in such a manner as his "girlfriend" demonstrated was actually immoral and yet he had her picture on his profile where there wasn't much else she could actually take off. He goes on about how women who dress like that are enticing men to sin and yet here you are seeing nowt wrong with it. I'll be honest with you. The woman in his profile at that point was an absolute stunner and I was allured by her to say the least. The difference is I'm not judging women by how they dress to begin with, yet the pair of you act like moral prudes.

              Oh, and she was not his girlfriend GD.

              You simpletons call a stripper's BEHAVIOR good. It's BEHAVIOR that makes one DESERVING of consequences. You two "holier than thou" heathens are a joke, and you refuse to shut your big mouths, so you need to be exposed for the libtards you both are.
              Eh, being called 'holier than thou' by the likes of you means total squat GD. You're a pompous prude until it suits otherwise. If I had CS's "girlfriend" pic in my own profile and claiming it to be the case you'd have been jabbering on about how unseemly it was.
              Well this is fun isn't it?

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Rusha View Post
                I am just content that that monstrosity of a threat is closed. I don't see any issue with posting responses that are currently available for ANY member to view and decipher on their own.
                Yes - it was done to me, by taking old posts from me and posting them, in an attempt to say I'm not saved. That was hilarious and ridiculous. It exposed the Judge

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by patrick jane View Post
                  I know CS admitted those other identities and I can't believe the shocking and disgusting things he said.
                  He shouldn't have made such accusations towards AB when he knew full well that his past history is in full view for anyone to see.

                  Also, if you have noticed, when he is on threads that are discussing CvsE or other religious threads, I don't even bother with this thread.

                  It was about the thread in question and the fact that rape was being promoted as a way to punish women some members hold in disdain. Frankly, I don't care who the member is ... IF they post something so repugnant, I am going to respond.
                  A man you can bait with a tweet is not a man
                  we can trust with nuclear weapons.

                  Bill Clinton






                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by patrick jane View Post
                    Yes - it was done to me, by taking old posts from me and posting them, in an attempt to say I'm not saved. That was hilarious and ridiculous. It exposed the Judge
                    She is the Judge only in her own mind.
                    A man you can bait with a tweet is not a man
                    we can trust with nuclear weapons.

                    Bill Clinton






                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Arthur Brain View Post
                      Oh, you do do you? Because as I recall, CS was claiming that dressing in such a manner as his "girlfriend" demonstrated was actually immoral and yet he had her picture on his profile where there wasn't much else she could actually take off. He goes on about how women who dress like that are enticing men to sin and yet here you are seeing nowt wrong with it. I'll be honest with you. The woman in his profile at that point was an absolute stunner and I was allured by her to say the least. The difference is I'm not judging women by how they dress to begin with, yet the pair of you act like moral prudes.

                      Oh, and she was not his girlfriend GD.
                      Correct ...
                      A man you can bait with a tweet is not a man
                      we can trust with nuclear weapons.

                      Bill Clinton






                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by glorydaz View Post
                        People getting their just deserts is an excellent thread.

                        It's the nonsense you two clowns insisted on bringing into the thread that made it a "monstrosity".
                        So...

                        It's okay to slag off women who dress scantily in public but it's okay to have one in your profile as your apparent "girlfriend"?
                        Well this is fun isn't it?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Arthur Brain View Post
                          So...

                          It's okay to slag off women who dress scantily in public but it's okay to have one in your profile as your apparent "girlfriend"?
                          Inquiring minds want to know.
                          A man you can bait with a tweet is not a man
                          we can trust with nuclear weapons.

                          Bill Clinton






                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X