10 people shot at party in Detroit
- Thread starter fool
- Start date
6days
New member
They didn't say.
| 400 to 500 people were attending the neighborhood party |
That's a lot of folks.
Nobody shot back?
Not much info. Don't know yet if it was a drive-by or if someone at the party pulled a gun and started shooting.
They do say that they think the dead man was the intended target. But didn't say why they thought that.
And they don't even say whether the shooter was male or female.
Makes it kinda hard to be on the lookout when you don't have any description of the culprit.
Anyway, hope they catch whoever did it.
musterion
Well-known member
a. If the shooter is a minority and the victims are minorities, the incident is primarily counted as "local news" and may or may not rise to the level of national media attention.
b. If the shooter is white, including police in the line of duty, and the victims are minorities, the incident is automatically counted as racially motivated with the probable addition of "right wing extremist" and the story will receive immediate national attention.
c. If the shooter is white and the victims are white, the shooter will automatically be labeled "right wing extremist" and will be used to highlight the need for repealing the 2A and outlawing guns.
d. If the shooter is a minority and the victims are white, the story may or may not be reported on a national level. If it is, the shooter's description, including name, will be concealed as long as possible. Once the shooter's identity as a minority is revealed, every effort to portray the shooter as "right wing" will be employed.
e. In the event the label "right wing" cannot be substantiated, or evidence of the shooter's leftism is found, such will not be reported by the mainstream media and no retraction of the false right wing label will ever occur. By the time alternative media report the facts, the MSM will have moved on and the story will effectively no longer exist in the public eye.
f. Any and all shootings may, at the media's discretion, be used by the MSM to push for the need to repeal the 2A and outlaw guns.
b. If the shooter is white, including police in the line of duty, and the victims are minorities, the incident is automatically counted as racially motivated with the probable addition of "right wing extremist" and the story will receive immediate national attention.
c. If the shooter is white and the victims are white, the shooter will automatically be labeled "right wing extremist" and will be used to highlight the need for repealing the 2A and outlawing guns.
d. If the shooter is a minority and the victims are white, the story may or may not be reported on a national level. If it is, the shooter's description, including name, will be concealed as long as possible. Once the shooter's identity as a minority is revealed, every effort to portray the shooter as "right wing" will be employed.
e. In the event the label "right wing" cannot be substantiated, or evidence of the shooter's leftism is found, such will not be reported by the mainstream media and no retraction of the false right wing label will ever occur. By the time alternative media report the facts, the MSM will have moved on and the story will effectively no longer exist in the public eye.
f. Any and all shootings may, at the media's discretion, be used by the MSM to push for the need to repeal the 2A and outlaw guns.
seven more will be shot in the chicago area today
but
it will not be reported
they are not hate crimes
but
it will not be reported
they are not hate crimes
Sure, it can be spun to any agenda.
But it shouldn't matter what race, gender, or political affiliation is involved.
A murderer is a murderer because he murdered. He is not a murderer because of his race, gender, etc.
Sure.
But this thread is not about an abortion, so we don't need your help in derailing.
musterion
Well-known member
No, of course it shouldn't. However, the fact that murders by minorities, or at least their identities, go underreported if not totally unreported by the MSM proves it does matter to the Left: selective reporting to further the divisive agenda that leads to Utopia.
For example, this lawlessness will never make national news.
Last edited:
Yeppers.
Why would some guy punching a cop be considered national news?
musterion
Well-known member
It's not newsworthy one way or another. Slow night at the Post, I guess.
P.S. Once again: Every attempt you make to insult me's inaccurate and makes you look like a squint-eyed clueless tone-deaf and oblivious idiot.
Because him and his sister were attacking the police and his sister had her hands on his (the cops) service weapon.
Both being legitimate reasons to be shot by the cops.
But of course it should be national news, the libbies dont want the black community to see that in most cases where they could be shot by cops = they arent.
Last edited:
They would have said, if the people were white in a heartbeat. Ive noticed the news often omits the color of the attacker when they are black as well as witnesses tend not to cooperate when they are black also.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/21/us/detroit-birthday-party-shooting/