Ecumenicist
New member
Originally posted by smaller
who let that DUCK in here?
Sorry, bean soup for dinner...
Oh, I thought you asked if anyone sat on a duck...
be doomp cha!
Originally posted by smaller
who let that DUCK in here?
Originally posted by smaller
Content Dave content.
If you really have specific complaint SPIT IT OUT.
I know you live on the edges of the eternal damnation of others as well...go figure...
You mean like a luke warm theology?
I've said it before, I think that a Univeralist God would be just
as tyranical as a homo hating right wing God.
What's going to happen when Poly gets to the gates and
sees Beanie? She's gonna say "wait a minute, if he's in
there, I'm not going in."
You think God's going to force
her into heavan? I think not...
Originally posted by smaller
Yeah, she will be the one whinging about her "wages" and her little shack on the outSKIRTS of town. go figure...
Using YOUR theology let's see.
A.) Burn in torture FOREVER...
B.) Spend eternit in BLISS...
Damn that God of force...
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Oh, so your heavan has a good section and a bad section of
town. I see...
A. Accept God's Graceful, Loving invitation into reconcilliation
and paradise.
B. Reject it and suffer in darkness, of your own free will.
God is a God of invitation, not force.
I am a disgusting, vile, wicked pervert! I am not worthy of anything God has to offer me, and all he asks is that I accept His gift. He offers it to me even though I don't deserve it. How could someone love me so much?! It breaks my heart. I don't deserve this, but he offers it to me anyway. He tells me that I don't have to get what I deserve. And He merely waits for me to accept or reject. And he doesn't just tell me to go to hell, if I refuse. He merely tells me that hell is what I deserve, but I don't have to go there...and if I ever decide to accept Him, He will be there waiting for me. I think I want to accept that love.
Originally posted by Dave Miller
You mean like a luke warm theology?
I've said it before, I think that a Univeralist God would be just
as tyranical as a homo hating right wing God.
What's going to happen when Poly gets to the gates and
sees Beanie? She's gonna say "wait a minute, if he's in
there, I'm not going in." You think God's going to force
her into heavan? I think not...
djm
Originally posted by deardelmar
If Poly get to the gates and sees anyone she didn't expect to see she won't be looking at them through the prism of "the flesh". Having said that I do not expect to see any unrepentant homos either!
Originally posted by adajos
So are you suggesting that I am a lukewarm Christian because I disagree with your approach? That's the only sense I can make of that since beanieboy makes no claim to be a Christian.
I notice you didn't address my post directly to show how she wasn't exalting herself. You disagreed without supporting your idea with reasons.
Yes, harshness is useful. Christ clearly was harsh at times. But not to anonymous strangers. He was especially harsh to leaders who were leading people astray and who were being bad examples to their followers.
So when you say Christ never tolerated sin, what do you mean by that? Are you denying that he ever associated with sinners prior to repentance? If you mean Christ never excused sin or implied that it was ok, then I agree with you. But perhaps you mean more than that?
No, that's not all it takes. Acknowledging that she is a Christian but is still capable of committing the sin of self-righteousness. She refused to even recognize the possibility. Do you as well? You say her fruit isn't prideful, and yet you gave no substantive reason as to why you disagreed with me when I claimed she was exalting herself.
You need to read a bit more closely about the "rejoicing" she will do when people are condemned for eternity.
From dictionary.com
I rest my case. Please explain how she is not expressing great pleasure at the misfortune of others.
I hope she would be glad.
I've said it before, but I'll say it again: Not calling people foul, offensive names is not equivalent to "tolerating sin".
I didn't realize the name of the sin was "queer" or "fag" or "homo".
If by your statement you mean you are viscerally repulsed by what they do, then I agree. But I don't think visceral repulsion at sinful actions we treat them worse than other sinners.
I am viscerally repulsed at anal sex within a heterosexual marriage as well. So what? Oh yeah, overweight heterosexual married people having sex also repulses me.
I'm going to try this again. beanieboy is not a Christian. I think we all agree on that. Why then should we expect his behavior to be Christian behavior? Would you expect a nonbeliever to judge everything correctly? I sure wouldn't. I expect more from Poly, which is why I take issue with her.
The reason I'm directing things at Poly is because she is pushing him away from the truth of the Gospel with personal attacks.
Actually they did act. All the time. It's just that their actions were the wrong actions. They condemned and judged incessantly without loving. Jesus was upset with their wrong actions as well as their inaction on the important things.
In fact, sometimes they did the right actions. In the parable of the Widow's mite, the hypocrite gaves tons of money to God. It was his motivations, his heart, that were wrong. The Pharisees appeared righteous from the outside, but on the inside they were rotten. That's why Christ called them "whitewashed walls".
If you don't look righteous on the outside, then a comparison to a Pharisee is a bad comparison.
Of course "upon their own rules" was intended to get at the incessant rules about how if we don't call people foul names we don't really love them.
Look, if that's what I've been doing, then may God truly forgive me and may beanieboy know Christ personally. However, I think I've been trying to prevent pointless harm be done to an unbeliever by getting a wrong idea of how Christians ought to act.
beanie knows the Gospel message already. I decided to try a more action-oriented strategy in witnessing, namely by caring when he is abused.
Have I ever anywhere in this thread claimed that Christians shouldn't judge. Is not calling him a "queer" equivalent to not judging?
Not all witnesses must begin directly with a gospel presentation, especially when the nonbeliever is already familiar. Sometimes it begins with standing up for what's right.
And obviously you haven't read Chileice's posts to beanieboy either.
See, I don't think you're reading what I've written. This is a blatant strawman. I have never denied it's a sin, I have never stated that we shouldn't oppose it. It is a sin. We ought to inform sinners of that truth. It's how we do it, and the attitude with which we do it that concerns me.
Originally posted by Cyrus of Persia
Although the Bible in some places condemns homosexuality the guilt of Sodom was not homosexualism. So "sodomy" is wrong word for it.
NOT AT ALL. I just think that some people miss to read the whole list of the sins mentioned and point out to homosexuality as it would be the worst one.
Originally posted by Poly
We need to be really careful though. We don't want her to look like this. :flamer:
:chuckle:
Nevertheless, He did not call her a slut or other derogatory names, did He?Originally posted by Nineveh
The woman at the well didn't seem to know Jesus, yet he all but called her a slut, didn't He?
Originally posted by Lucky
Nevertheless, He did not call her a slut or other derogatory names, did He?