Two ways, by example and through His word. But regardless of whether you agree with the example part His word is pretty clear on the point, which is why I used it to answer you at the first. So rather than a side bar on interpreting His actions and what they evidence, I'll rest on the response I gave you from scripture. That's sufficient.
You can call me that, but you'll never demonstrate it with a word I've written.
And I answered you, meshak. I'm not going to argue with you about it. Jesus is God. What God says, however He chooses to say it, remains His. The word is His word. So when I post scripture I'm answering you with God's own words. I don't know of anything more directly to the point.
Rather, you don't have to, but you do need to or you're just another false accuser, long on libel and short on temper.
I can't help what you think about what I think, but you asked and I answered you. That's about all I can do. Now I have to go attend to a mound of work that's coming due.
I can't help what you think about what I think, but you asked and I answered you. That's about all I can do. Now I have to go attend to a mound of work that's coming due.
You have a pleasant evening.
I generally don't need a link to know what and who I'm dealing with when someone stomps into a conversation to call me a liar and uses scripture to nurse a personal spite. People like you do more damage to the faith than the anti-theists and mocking atheists. You should be real comfortable with Sod (doser) I see he's still nipping at my heels and rushing to encourage you. Like you, he confuses his personal issues with God's. I think you're going to be my second addition to the ignore pile. :think: Consider it done.
When someone asks you for an answer and then they tell you they don't think you understood your answer the kindest thing to do is recognize what they're attempting and wish them well anyway.
:e4e:
We can believe you or we can believe the Lord (Mt 16:18).
oly: I'm going with him. You're going away (Re 20:7-10). :burnlib: