themuzicman
Well-known member
That's not dispensationalism. That's just recognizing that there are two major covenants in the bible.
ECT Ever wonder why dispensationalism has become increasingly despised?
- Thread starter musterion
- Start date
- Status
That's not dispensationalism. That's just recognizing that there are two major covenants in the bible.
Nang
TOL Subscriber
Only MADists think so . . .
heir
TOL Subscriber
Those of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John were and will be under the law!
Matthew 5:18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
Matthew 19:17 KJV, Matthew 28:18-20 KJV
Yet here we are!
Romans 3:21 But now the righteousness of God without the law is manifested, being witnessed by the law and the prophets;
Romans 3:22 Even the righteousness of God which is by faith of Jesus Christ unto all and upon all them that believe: for there is no difference:
We must 2 Timothy 2:15 KJV!
heir
TOL Subscriber
You wish! It's this:
Ephesians 3:1 For this cause I Paul, the prisoner of Jesus Christ for you Gentiles,
Ephesians 3:2 If ye have heard of the dispensation of the grace of God which is given me to you-ward:
Ephesians 3:3 How that by revelation he made known unto me the mystery; (as I wrote afore in few words,
Ephesians 3:4 Whereby, when ye read, ye may understand my knowledge in the mystery of Christ)
Ephesians 3:5 Which in other ages was not made known unto the sons of men, as it is now revealed unto his holy apostles and prophets by the Spirit;
Ephesians 3:6 That the Gentiles should be fellowheirs, and of the same body, and partakers of his promise in Christ by the gospel:
heir
TOL Subscriber
You do
Galatians 1:8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.
Galatians 1:9 As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.
Galatians 1:10 For do I now persuade men, or God? or do I seek to please men? for if I yet pleased men, I should not be the servant of Christ.
Galatians 1:11 But I certify you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached of me is not after man.
Galatians 1:12 For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ.
genuineoriginal
New member
1 Timothy 4 3 Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know the truth. |
Do you know which foods God created to be received with thanksgiving and which foods He did not?
Last edited:
Who is this "they're trying to" that are you referring to?
Who was the Messiah written TO?
No, it shows the difference between the old covenant and the new covenant.
There are no time periods called "dispensations", there are however covenants.
No, I'm positive Nang thinks you are in gross error. I agree with Nang, you are in gross error.
The Apostle Paul was a minister of the New Covenant, and the same gospel was preached to all.
(Gal 2:7) On the contrary, they recognized that I had been entrusted with the task of preaching the gospel to the uncircumcised, just as Peter had been to the circumcised.
"gospel" means "good news".
Your "two gospel" theory means one of the "good news" was "bad news" for others.
Your Bullingerism is a mess.
I cant speak for muz, but I'm pretty sure he is referring to Darby followers.
ClimateSanity
New member
Make a point or shut up. Don't ask baited irrelevant questions.
ClimateSanity
New member
Don't tell heir what dispensationalism is or isn't. Dispensationalism is what it's believers agree it is, not it's opponents. Snob
ClimateSanity
New member
If you eat pork and you are aware of the biblical admonition against it, you are ignoring that admonition for a reason, most likely because it DOESNT pertain to you.
1Mind1Spirit
Literal lunatic
It pertains......
Since Jerusalem (Babylon) was plowed it's spiritual meaning is all that's left for all men.
Be not like the sow who only makes a sound to it's master when it is hungry, then is only content after getting fed.
Jeremiah 10:15
They are vanity, and the work of errors: in the time of their visitation they shall perish.
genuineoriginal
New member
Jerusalem is not Babylon.
The two cities represent opposing ideals.
Jerusalem represents God's fulfilled promises to His chosen people following His commandments.
Babylon represents exile from the land for refusing to follow God's commandments.
Your calling Jerusalem by the name Babylon is as stupid as calling Sarah by the name Hagar.
1Mind1Spirit
Literal lunatic
1Mind1Spirit
Literal lunatic
No, yer mixin' up the Jerusalem above with the one on planet earth.
genuineoriginal
New member
You are obviously not well versed in scripture.
I am talking about Jerusalem, mentioned in this prophecy:
Zechariah 12:6-8 6 In that day will I make the governors of Judah like an hearth of fire among the wood, and like a torch of fire in a sheaf; and they shall devour all the people round about, on the right hand and on the left: and Jerusalem shall be inhabited again in her own place, even in Jerusalem. 7 The Lord also shall save the tents of Judah first, that the glory of the house of David and the glory of the inhabitants of Jerusalem do not magnify themselves against Judah. 8 In that day shall the Lord defend the inhabitants of Jerusalem; and he that is feeble among them at that day shall be as David; and the house of David shall be as God, as the angel of the Lord before them. |
- Status