ECT Ever wonder why dispensationalism has become increasingly despised?

[tetelestai]

lol,In the parable of the fig tree,right above that verse,when did the branch become tender and put forth leaves? will you continue in your path of literal doesn't apply,or will you point to something in the events of the first century and say it was literally fulfilled?

Jesus lists the things:

False Messiahs
Wars and rumors of wars
Famines and earthquakes
Persecutions
Betrayal
Abomination of desolation standing in the Holy Place
False prophets
Jerusalem surrounded by armies

A fig tree has nothing to do with anything, it was a parable.

 

[whitestone]

Jesus lists the things:

False Messiahs
Wars and rumors of wars
Famines and earthquakes
Persecutions
Betrayal
Abomination of desolation standing in the Holy Place
False prophets
Jerusalem surrounded by armies

A fig tree has nothing to do with anything, it was a parable.

ooooh,poor tet want a tissue?

 

[tetelestai]

ooooh,poor tet want a tissue?

(Matt 24:34) Truly I tell you, this generation will certainly not pass away until all these things have happened.

 

[Danoh]

Nope.

The Jews were entrusted with the oracles of God because God had divorced the 10 tribes from the House of Israel.

So, while the Gentiles became fellow heirs with Israel, the "Israel" Eph 3:6 is referring to are the Jews who had been entrusted with the oracles of God.

It's why Paul said Jew and Gentile are one new man in Christ.

If you understood the differences between the two houses, you would understand that many of the Gentiles that became heirs with the Jews were descendants of the Israelites from the 10 tribes.

Hah; now you sound like Bullinger's delusion as to the Apostle Paul's supposed two gospels (Acts and Post Acts). Only, he was at least consistent in his error on this, for you assert one gospel.

You are a mess :chuckle:

 

[Right Divider]

Have you read Acts or any if the early Church Fathers? They would hold the answer to your question

Your false premise leads to false conclusions.

 

[Danoh]

(Matt 24:34) Truly I tell you, this generation will certainly not pass away until all these things have happened.

Yeah; but those remaining "stones cry out" that yours is error read by you in to these passages.

 

[Right Divider]

Who was the Messiah promised to?

(Matt 15:24) He answered, "I was sent only to the lost sheep of Israel."

Are you part of the lost sheep of Israel?

If not, why did you steal Israel's Messiah for yourself?

You really are dumber than a box of rocks.

The risen LORD Jesus Christ is the HEAD of the CHURCH. We don't have to "steal" Him.

 

[tetelestai]

Hah; now you sound like Bullinger's delusion as to the Apostle Paul's supposed two gospels (Acts and Post Acts). Only, he was at least consistent in his error on this, for you assert one gospel.

You are a mess :chuckle:

(Rom 3:2) Much in every way. To begin with, the Jews were entrusted with the oracles of God.

 

[tetelestai]

You really are dumber than a box of rocks.

The risen LORD Jesus Christ is the HEAD of the CHURCH. We don't have to "steal" Him.

Who was the Messiah promised to?

Why is it ok for you to have Israel's promised Messiah, but not ok for Israel's promised New Covenant?

 

[Right Divider]

(Eph 3:6) This mystery is that through the gospel the Gentiles are heirs together with Israel, members together of one body, and sharers together in the promise in Christ Jesus.

Still using that bogus "translation" is see.

 

[tetelestai]

Still using that bogus "translation" is see.

See post #170

 

[1Mind1Spirit]

Hah; now you sound like Bullinger's delusion as to the Apostle Paul's supposed two gospels (Acts and Post Acts). Only, he was at least consistent in his error on this, for you assert one gospel.

You are a mess :chuckle:

Pot calling kettle......

 

[Right Divider]

See post #170

Still using those multiple bogus "translations" I see.

 

[1Mind1Spirit]

Who was the Messiah promised to?

Why is it ok for you to have Israel's promised Messiah, but not ok for Israel's promised New Covenant?

They figure Jesus is only a flesh dude to Israel don't they?

 

[Danoh]

Pot calling kettle......

No, old fool; Bullinger was Acts 28. My view is Acts 9, more or less.

HUGE difference.

Do your homework.

 

[Danoh]

Who was the Messiah promised to?

Why is it ok for you to have Israel's promised Messiah, but not ok for Israel's promised New Covenant?

Who says Mid-Acts claim's Israel's Messiah after the flesh?

But; Mid-Acts is a mystery to you; a proverb only those with ears to hear and eyes to see; can.

And you know you log on each day spiritually blind as a literal bat.

Now we know no man after the flesh, o ever fleshly one.

 

[tetelestai]

Still using those multiple bogus "translations" I see.

It doesn't matter what Bible you use, the Gentiles became fellow heirs with the promises to Israel.

 

[njspolk]

Your false premise leads to false conclusions.

Which premise and which conclusion? We've hit a couple subjects in this discussion lol


Sent from my iPhone using TOL

 

[1Mind1Spirit]

No, old fool; Bullinger was Acts 28. My view is Acts 9, more or less.

HUGE difference.

Do your homework.

My homework has nothing to do with Bullinger.



My homework is far out dude, remember?

 

[tetelestai]

Who says Mid-Acts claim's Israel's Messiah after the flesh?

Who was the Messiah promised to?

But; Mid-Acts is a mystery to you; a proverb only those with ears to hear and eyes to see; can.

There is no mystery in Mid-Acts.

You guys can't even show anyone were in Mid-Acts this alleged mystery is. That's why some of you are Acts 7, some are Acts 9, and some are Acts 13.

And you know you log on each day spiritually blind as a literal bat.

Nope, it's the Darby followers who are spiritually blind.

Now we know no man after the flesh, o ever fleshly one.

Yet you claim God still has a plan for a fleshly people.