And Millie shore prefigured the "luke warm" "the church," as she almost married Howard, then free loaded after Sam.
Does Luke 19:44 disprove Preterism?
- Thread starter George Affleck
- Start date
And Millie shore prefigured the "luke warm" "the church," as she almost married Howard, then free loaded after Sam.
musterion
Well-known member
Nah, I'm already wearing my scapular cup. Man, I'm racking up get out of purgatory points this week, let me tell you.
musterion
Well-known member
Where does Floyd figure in to end-times prophecy? One of the two witnesses?
I figure that he was the leader of the 144,000, as his going from a "2 chair" clip joint, to a "3 chair," pre-figured the olive tree on Main Street growing, as the kingdom advances, even includin Babs Eden/"Jeannie," as included, that Jezebel nail lady. Ask the Mayor about her.
musterion
Well-known member
I dunno, man...I hear she married a Klingon. :nono:
lifeisgood
New member
Let's see, something to the effect:
I Tet said: “And that is what happened. The Lord came in a way that everyone could see Him”.
However, somehow Tet also said that the Lord was never seen. :think:
musterion
Well-known member
This is why he was asked who eyewitnessed the razing of Jerusalem AND wrote that it the return of Christ. He said no one did. Mythology is funny sometimes.
Christ Jesus told the Christians what to do when they saw Jerusalem surrounded. They were told to flee the city and Judaea, and those in the country were told not to go to Judaea or the city. That's what they did.
Therefore, there were no Christian eyewitness of what took place in Judaea and Jerusalem.
We have the writings of Josephus, Tacitus, and some others, but none of them were Christians.
Therefore, a non-Christian wasn't going to know anything about the return of Christ in 70AD.
Eusebius of Caesarea wrote that it was the return of Christ about 240 years later. That doesn't mean he was the first to do so, it means what he wrote is amongst the oldest writings that exist that say so.
Eusebius made it clear, that if you read the eyewitness account of Josephus, it's next to impossible not to see the fulfillment of the prophecies about Jerusalem and the Jews that Christ Jesus made.
However, you have an agenda, and are only interested in defending the false teachings of Darby.
It doesn't surprise me that you make posts like this.
On one hand you claim to be an expert on Luis De Alcazar and claim he singlehandedly systemized Preterism, but on the other hand (as a Dispensationalist), you claim to have no idea who John Nelson Darby was.
Go read some of your fellow Darby Follower Hal Lindsay's books. They won't be much different than the posts you Darby Followers are making in this thread about Mayberry.
Fiction is fiction.
The four beasts are described to Daniel. They pertain to the Jews, not Israel before it split into two nations.
The four beasts exist during the 70 weeks.
The 70 weeks are for the Jews, not the Israelites from the 10 tribes of Israel.
No one knows for sure.
Whoever they were, they had something to do with Rome and Judaea between 30AD and 70AD.
All the prophecies about the beast and the false prophet were fulfilled by 70AD.
=He is getting bloodied-his Darby spam
How about that thread, devil boy, and Demar plagiarizer?
I thought so-as usual, you folded, against me, "scurrying like a cockroach, when the light is shown on him."
You taught us that cute, sissy boy saying-we learned that from you.
...you are a fraud, charlatan........
“And that is what happened. The Lord came in a way that everyone could see Him”.
.....as you won't identify this "everyone" that saw this "Jesus," that allegedly returned in AD 70, "un physically," "running and hiding," for 2 years.
Why is that, Craigie?
"Let's see, something to the effect:
I Tet said: “And that is what happened. The Lord came in a way that everyone could see Him”.
However, somehow Tet also said that the Lord was never seen"-LIG
See the evasion, dodge ball, bob and weave, from this fraud.
Identify this "everyone" that saw this "un physical," "never seen" Savior, punk.
whitestone
Well-known member
Yep, I don't think Egypt is it either because it has been a kingdom from antiquity,all throughout history it's never not existed as a nation and now it's 2016 and it's still a nation.
And so I've got it checked off my list of possibles to fit to :"was was not yet is/ ascend out of the pit ect. What about the next possible one effecting Israel, Assyria? How long have they been a nation? Is their a period of time in the worlds history where it was wounded to death,cast in the pit ect.ect?
Again, the Assyrians didn't rule over Jerusalem. The Assyrians removed the Israelites of the 10 tribes from the Northern Nation of Israel.
Daniel's 70 weeks were for the Jews, not the Israelites from the 10 tribes.
Assyria has nothing to do with the 70 weeks.
musterion
Well-known member
Maybe Spanky thinks it was a fulfillment of all the "seeing, they shall not see" verses. You know...they did "see" Roman Jesus but just didn't "see" that it was Him. But they still "saw" Him because the army was Him. So He was there, because they...you know..."saw" Him...in the Romans. Because Bocephus said so. Or something.
Wimp Craigie is punting addressing his satanic "doctrine," lies, hypocrisy, with the MAD heavy hitters, knowing he is getting picked apart, focusing on others, that he thinks that he can "spiritually rape," until they eventually figure out his deception, and then Craigie will spam his "Darby" stumper to them.