An appeal to 2P2Ps

[SaulToPaul 2]

That shows that it is current! And its Peter not Paul, preaching the same message as Paul! Wow! They were offered justification from their sins. Just as the Gospel always does! It is not an offer of a theocracy and it is not an offer of something at the 2nd coming. It's always clear, and thanks for quoting it!

Christ is accepted by heaven---proof of his perfect sacrifice, proof that he is the Holy One who would not see corruption. Then everything on earth will be replaced to what it should in the NHNE. Fantastic, hey? But not Judaistic.

The Day of Atonement is fulfilled when the LORD returns.

You need to go back to square one and start over. Trash the books of men in your library, get yourself a King James Bible, and believe what you read.

 

[Interplanner]

The Day of Atonement is fulfilled when the LORD returns.

You need to go back to square one and start over. Trash the books of men in your library, get yourself a King James Bible, and believe what you read.

That is the perverse habit I'm confronting you about: that is not what Heb 10A says. And you know it and you need to stop worshipping the KJV.

I do believe what I read from the AAL. I don't believe most of what you say.

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

you need to stop worshipping the KJV.

Is there any Bible that you believe, rely on, and trust the words of?

 

[Interplanner]

Is there any Bible that you believe, rely on, and trust the words of?

what do you call it when it is the Greek NT?

 

[Right Divider]

:chuckle:

Poor confused soul.
Your confusion is due to unbelief.

Not only is he a "real writer" and a "grammar scholar", he's also a rocket surgeon.

 

[Interplanner]

Don't forget, we are talking to people who think a normal translation of Mk 1:2 is a "lie."

 

[Right Divider]

Don't forget, we are talking to people who think a normal translation of Mk 1:2 is a "lie."

Nope, we believe every word in the Word.

Unlike you that needs to jump from translation to translation until you can make it say what you want it to say (you think).

 

[Danoh]

Don't forget, we are talking to people who think a normal translation of Mk 1:2 is a "lie."

There you go, folks; IP resorting to blanket statement lying once more.

Par for the course where the self-styled, consistently poor, supposed "historian" IP is concerned.

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

Not only is he a "real writer" and a "grammar scholar", he's also a rocket surgeon.

A rocket surgeon and a brain scientist...

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

Don't forget, we are talking to people who think a normal translation of Mk 1:2 is a "lie."

Mark 1:2 (NIV) is a blatant lie.

 

[Interplanner]

Mark 1:2 (NIV) is a blatant lie.

It says 20 things, you simpleton. What is the lie? If its what I think (Isaiah as source) it is not the NIV!!! The original says Isaiah. I've been through this. It is the favored reading of the best 5 manuscripts.

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

It says 20 things, you simpleton.

A simple simpleton?

Mark 1:2 (NIV) is still a lie. Why are you so adamant to defend a blatant lie?
What does that say about you?

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

the best 5 manuscripts.

:chuckle:

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

The original says Isaiah.

:rotfl:

 

[Right Divider]

:rotfl:

It's good to know the guy that has the original.

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

It's good to know the guy that has the original.

He's sitting on a goldmine...no wonder he's such an unsuccessful novelist! no real motivation

 

[john w]

That is the perverse habit I'm confronting you about: that is not what Heb 10A says. And you know it and you need to stop worshipping the KJV.

I do believe what I read from the AAL. I don't believe most of what you say.

The old "worshipping the bible" satanic ploy.

No, punk, bible believers(in contrast to bible agnostics/mystics/correctors, such as yourself)honor, esteem, magnify and praise what the LORD God honors, esteems, magnifies, and praises-His book.


Want the scriptural references? No, you don't.

 

[john w]

what do you call it when it is the Greek NT?

The punk lied-again-there is no such thing as "the Greek NT."

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

The punk lied-again-there is no such thing as "the Greek NT."

Just wait, he claims to have the originals.

 

[Danoh]

Just wait, he claims to have the originals.

In fairness, he was referring to the original copies of texts the various English Bibles are based on.

Everyone one knows the originals - not copies - have long ceased to exist on this Earth.

You might do well to look into a course like Jordan's/GSB's extensive course on Manuscript Evidence (perhaps the only one out there that is KJVO from a Mid-Acts Perspective - most out there are from a Baptist KJVO perspective; which is different).