Hey, sweetie spam artist-post # 454. Notice the punk, within a few posts, spams his "No one taught.....until the Flintstones taught it" spam-that's all the punk has::
ECT Ever wonder why dispensationalism has become increasingly despised?
- Thread starter musterion
- Start date
- Status
Hey, sweetie spam artist-post # 454. Notice the punk, within a few posts, spams his "No one taught.....until the Flintstones taught it" spam-that's all the punk has::
You deny the words of Paul:
(1 Cor 7:29) But this I say, brethren, the time is short: it remaineth, that both they that have wives be as though they had none;
(1 Cor 10:11) These things happened to them as examples and were written down as warnings for us, on whom the culmination of the ages has come.
(Rom 16:20) The God of peace will soon crush Satan under your feet. The grace of our Lord Jesus be with you.
Interplanner
Well-known member
Hey quibblers over stones in the Judean mountains! Try this: "What is obsolete and aging will soon disappear."
Be careful what you say; now you are dealing with the doctrinal declarations of the New Covenant.
Interplanner
Well-known member
lol!
Yes, our effort is required for sanctification. It is war. But we must also try to do this in the Spirit, compelled by the Gospel.
The OC was obsolete and aging and would soon disappear for good in 70AD.
The NC was implemented in 30AD
There was an overlap of the covenants for 40 years.
There is a typology of this in the OT. David's tent stood for 40 years with the Ark of the Covenant in it, while Moses' tabernacle stood also.
The priests carried out all their priestly duties at Moses' tabernacle, but God was present at David's tent.
That's pretty funny coming from a guy who claims animal sacrifices for sin atonement are to take place in the future.
You Darby followers are clueless when it comes to understanding grace.
musterion
Well-known member
My point is proven.
1. You deny the words of Paul-you are unemployed:
1 Timothy 5:8 KJV
8 But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel.
2. Post 436, sweetie boy-you deny the words of the LORD God:
musterion
Well-known member
If the Jews somehow managed to start up the entire priestly slaughter system next week, and did it by the Book, for sure they would believe God would honor their efforts.
I do not, and I'm pretty sure no other MAD here does either.
With that distraction dismissed, this point remains unaddressed:
Now your squirming again.
Dispensationalism teaches that Ezk 40-48 will happen in the future.
Dispensationalism teaches that animal sacrifices for sin atonement will be required from God.
Like I said, you Darby followers are clueless when it comes to understanding grace.
Hey, sweetie!
1. Explain the sacrifices.
2. Hilston picked you apart on that "argument," sweetie, and bloodied you, embarrassed you, which resulted in you bailing out from that massacre.Remember, little arms one?
Says the guy who claims God is going to require animal sacrifices for sin atonement in the future.
Once again, the mysteryboy proves that Darby followers are clueless when it comes to understanding grace.
(Heb 10:12,14)But when this priest had offered for all time one sacrifice for sins, ....For by one sacrifice he has made perfect forever those who are being made holy.
musterion
Well-known member
This really isn't about p-ism or d-ism. Never has been. It's all about defending false gospels of works by those who reject the true saving Gospel of grace, which requires opposing MAD, the stronghold of the grace Gospel here on TOL. That's what all these threads are ultimately about. Stop chasing the weasel around the mulberry bush and drop preterism -- nail Tet down on the place of his own efforts in justification and sanctification. He'll dodge it, weasel, slander Darby but if you keep it up and ignore his bait it'll make him go away for awhile. I watched him get REALLY uncomfortable when this line of inquiry was pursued. He did NOT want to have an open, honest, non-eschatological discussion of what we must and must not do to be saved.
I'd lay it out but you will have to earn my doing so.
Something you have proven incapable of with your endless baiting and accussations like the one you will continue to respond from in post after post after post.
You are like the jerk who pesters his neighbor and then concludes said neighbor must be up to no good.
Once again mysteryboy, you deny the one time sacrifice for sins on the cross. You claim it wasn't good enough for all sins, you claim people in the future will have to sacrifice animals for sin atonement.
You adhere to these anti-Christ beliefs, and then you think your going to lecture me on grace?
You're nuts!
:rotfl:
musterion
Well-known member
Slander. I never claimed that. Never believed it. Never will.
Prove it.
An unbeliever comes to you under conviction of sin and asks what he must do to be saved. Word for word, what would you tell him?
Popcorn time :chuckle:
- Status