You Cannot Love the Poor and Support Lockdowns

Trump Gurl

Credo in Unum Deum
You Cannot Love the Poor and Support Lockdowns

The economic success Americans, particularly blue-collar workers, experienced under President Donald Trump’s leadership was a threat to both the Democratic hierarchy and the Republican establishment. Democrats were threatened because Trump gained popularity amongst blue-collar workers, he expanded Republican outreach in the black community, and he attracted more Latinos to the Republican Party that rejected the left’s shift towards socialism. As far as the Republican establishment is concerned, Trump has proven that conservatives can get a lot done in D.C. if they have the conviction and the courage to do so. Republican voters will be far less tolerant of do-nothing establishment types going forward.
The Wuhan coronavirus exposed how incompetent Republican leaders in swing states were at enforcing their existing election laws, which may have cost President Trump the White House. More dangerously, the pandemic has revealed just how much Democrats lust for authoritarian power. Democrats have become so drunk on power, that they’ve used the pandemic to destroy the livelihoods of their own constituents in hopes of transforming America into a socialist country.
How else can you explain the dictatorial and unscientific lockdowns imposed by leading Democratic governors, such as Gavin Newsom of California, Andrew Cuomo of New York, and Gretchen Whitmer of Michigan, just to name a few? If lockdowns really worked, states like New York and New Jersey would have the lowest death rates, but they don’t. In fact, they have the highest death rates. And the reason why is simple: their governors are purposely ignoring the latest science, research and data because democrats are more concerned about broadening their power than they are about public health.
You don’t believe me? Would it surprise you to know that contact-tracing studies have shown that half of the people infected with COVID-19 caught the virus at home?

This is a great article all the way through. I strongly suggest reading it. It covers several topics discussed in this forum.
 

Gary K

New member
Banned
You Cannot Love the Poor and Support Lockdowns

The economic success Americans, particularly blue-collar workers, experienced under President Donald Trump’s leadership was a threat to both the Democratic hierarchy and the Republican establishment. Democrats were threatened because Trump gained popularity amongst blue-collar workers, he expanded Republican outreach in the black community, and he attracted more Latinos to the Republican Party that rejected the left’s shift towards socialism. As far as the Republican establishment is concerned, Trump has proven that conservatives can get a lot done in D.C. if they have the conviction and the courage to do so. Republican voters will be far less tolerant of do-nothing establishment types going forward.
The Wuhan coronavirus exposed how incompetent Republican leaders in swing states were at enforcing their existing election laws, which may have cost President Trump the White House. More dangerously, the pandemic has revealed just how much Democrats lust for authoritarian power. Democrats have become so drunk on power, that they’ve used the pandemic to destroy the livelihoods of their own constituents in hopes of transforming America into a socialist country.
How else can you explain the dictatorial and unscientific lockdowns imposed by leading Democratic governors, such as Gavin Newsom of California, Andrew Cuomo of New York, and Gretchen Whitmer of Michigan, just to name a few? If lockdowns really worked, states like New York and New Jersey would have the lowest death rates, but they don’t. In fact, they have the highest death rates. And the reason why is simple: their governors are purposely ignoring the latest science, research and data because democrats are more concerned about broadening their power than they are about public health.
You don’t believe me? Would it surprise you to know that contact-tracing studies have shown that half of the people infected with COVID-19 caught the virus at home?

This is a great article all the way through. I strongly suggest reading it. It covers several topics discussed in this forum.
Calling RINOs incompetent is ignoring their malice against conservatives. McConnell called conservatives crazy during Obama's years in office. And we can see his, and the rest of the RINOs attitude towards Trump. I have very little doubt that they were involved in the election scandal as deeply as were the Democrats and is just as deeply tied to China as they are.

How do you think McConnell keeps on getting reelected time after time when he has had an approval rating around 15% for years and yet somehow wins his reelection bids with winning percentages in the high 50s? As far as I'm concerned he's been involved in election fraud for decades.
 

chair

Well-known member
Lockdowns are bad- but so is the virus. Lockdowns hit blue collar workers worse- there is no question of that. Horrible for restaurant workers and hotel workers, for example.

I think it is possible to manage the epidemic better, without resorting to complete lockdowns- but it requires a huge amount of political will and power, which is lacking in most (though not all) democracies.
 

Gary K

New member
Banned
Lockdowns are bad- but so is the virus. Lockdowns hit blue collar workers worse- there is no question of that. Horrible for restaurant workers and hotel workers, for example.

I think it is possible to manage the epidemic better, without resorting to complete lockdowns- but it requires a huge amount of political will and power, which is lacking in most (though not all) democracies.
What a joke. A huge amount of political will and power to not lock down an entire society. What is being done has basically never been done before. But there is a huge amount of political will to lockdown and destroy the world's economy. You need to ask yourself why there is so much political will behind that idea.

The virus has basically no effect on the vast majority of the population. It's only the elderly and those with very poor health who are really affected by it. So, protect them and let the rest go on about their lives is the correct position. But politicians who advocate for those types of solutions get crucified by the press and the political left. You're one of those who practice crucifying politicians who support that idea. You advocate for it all the time.

And the press and leftist politicians advocate for very harsh restrictions. Restrictions that destroy personal liberty, the economy of the nation, and cause hunger, homelessness, and mental health issues and drug dependency. So why push for such destructive policies? I see only one reason. And that is to make people depressed, anxious, and to create dependency on government and destroy the individual's desire to feed, clothe, and house themselves. You know, make their own decisions on economic, moral and political issues. It's all about control.

Marx was all about destroying Western Christian cultures. And that is very clearly what this "pandemic" is being used to accomplish. The powers that be are destroying US society. It's their one and only goal.
 
Top