Let's see...
I haven't added or subtracted anything to the book of the Revelation.
And... I don't say the Lord delays His coming (as does a wicked servant) and agree He came quickly and is yet bodily coming quickly.
So... It's odd that you would even post that scripture reference.
It doesn't change anything. "Put away" (apoluo) is not divorce. It's the loosing (verbally, with witnesses by custom) of a spouse without a writ; making the innocent put away spouse an adulteress/adulterer, and anyone marrying that put away spouse an adulterer/adulteress by law. The only exception was porneia (foreign/pagan/idolatrous) spouses, which required no writ to put away (eg Ezra 10 wives).
Since there is no such modern equivalent of putting away without a writ, there is no current application for this passage in its hermeneutical context in the Gospels; and Paul was later addressing a version of Roman verbal divorce and the circumstances surrounding that issue.
Since Christ fulfilled the Abrahamic and Mosaic covenants of faith and law (the latter NOT being legislative, but covenantal), the Old Testament standard is upheld and fulfilled in Christ. Divorce and remarriage was and is allowed with a writ accompanying the putting away.
The Old Testament standard was argued as "any cause" versus "cause", with "cause" being sexual, physical, and/or emotional abuse or severe neglect. "Any cause" was the question put to Jesus by the Pharisees in Matthew 19 (likely after hearing of His addressing the topic in Matthew 5 after the Sermon on the Mount).
They were attempting to force Jesus' confession of Himself as Messiah by affrming the Shammai Rabbinical School's "cause" over the Hillel Rabbinical School's "any cause", which was foretold by the sages of old as a sign of His coming.
It was also an attempt for Jesus to take a stand that would divide the general public of the Theocracy and hopefully incite the same ire that got John the Baptist beheaded for his stance against such marital issues.
Instead, Jesus evaded their traps and parabalically revealed Himself as the Bridegroom to His pending Bride, which would include both Jews and Gentiles.
Those who engage in modern law methodology (the character, quality, and activity of THE law in modern forms) are not trusting Christ with faith for access into grace.
The New Testament standard for divorce and remarriage is putting away with a writ, as confirmed by our Savior. But in the New Testament era, we have all we need to forgive "any cause", including "cause" of sexual, physical, and/or emotional abuse and/or severe neglect.
So divorce and remarriage should be only for extreme cases and as led by the Spirit. It shouldn't be turned into the unpardonable sin, elevated above all the other sinning and sins that plague others' lives who may not be divorced or remarried.
If you and others were as concerned about the sanctity of your marriage to Christ as you are about wrongly judging those who are divorced (while clinging to your own sin AND the law), maybe there'd be an effective modern church in changing the world by sharing the Gospel.
But NOOOOOOO... Instead of sharing the Gospel, you spend your time accusing and condemning others according to your novice false doctrine and self-righteousness.
You are everything that is wrong with the modern Christian faith. May your unrighteous judgment be upon your own head.
