SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
I have no idea what you are saying.
I know you don't. You shouldn't be ranting about dispensationalists without knowing the difference.
I have no idea what you are saying.
They are not 'voices in my head.'!!! They are the constant staple of the shows and broadcasts and literature that there are all kinds of catastrophic events to happen around Israel that are going to be God's judgement. So, having set up that problem, they then procede to redefine 'saved' as escape from those problems. It completely obscures what core doctrinal chapters such as Rom 3 or Gal 3 or Heb 9 are saying about sin and justification and propitiation and atonement etc.
Additionally, they have reversed the sense of 'left behind' in Mt24B in which to be left is a bad thing, whereas anyone can see that being left in place in those passages was a good thing! It is incredulous what they imagine the Bible to be saying.
I'm sure you do believe that, but D'ism has mucked up so many other things and generated this whole 'industry' of end times events and scenarios, trying to get the Bible to have 2 peoples and 2 programs play out, saved 2 ways for 2 different reasons.
All Acts 2 dispensationalists.
STP, all Acts 2 Dispys are NOT like that.
Those clowns the fool is talking about are Acts 2 Dispy sensationalists - their version of the various Preterist sensationalists.
"One size fits all" is no better than another one.
I know you don't. You shouldn't be ranting about dispensationalists without knowing the difference.
Your above statement is not a sentence, therefore I don't know what it is saying. I have known D'ism for 40 years. What is the difference you are talking about? Do you have a 2nd reader there who could help with clarity before you post?
You should not be ranting about all dispensationalists, without knowing the difference between Acts 2 and Acts 9 dispensationalism. Your Acts 2 buddies are the ones writing sensational books.
Would it help if I wrote my reply in Koine Greek?
Those clowns the fool is talking about are Acts 2 Dispy sensationalists - their version of the various Preterist sensationalists.
Thus, Preterism is clearly a false teaching, not only because none of the things mentioned in Matthew 24 happened but also because Paul clearly explains that it didn't happen and why.
There are only minor differences between A2D and A9D.
Is the sheer weight of evidence, proof, eyewitness accounts which surround all the other gospel facts.
His birth, life, death, burial, resurrection, His being seen by many during 40 days and His ascension.
All these facts are solidly testified to
But His coming again is with a much greater display of power and glory and we have
ZIPPO
Zippo evidence for it ever happening, just one weak and crooked account by Josephus.
No sure testimony, no weight of evidence, no credible eyewitness account....Zippo
The greatest display of God's glory and power and zippo
...talk about a secret rapture this is a secret coming again in great power and glory
No sure testimony, no weight of evidence, no credible eyewitness account....Zippo
The greatest display of God's glory and power and zippo
:chuckle:
Preterism is impossible because our bodies still die, and the creation still mourns because everything in creation still dies.
Posters like TeT believe Christ returned in the form of the Roman army in the year 70AD. What a line of hooey that is.
hooeyThe destruction of Jerusalem in 70AD was "The Day of the Lord".
Full Preterism is false,
but Jesus did come in 70 A.D., when the temple was destroyed.