Was Lazarus A 'Bum'?

annabenedetti

annabenedetti

like marbles on glass
Arthur Brain said:
Nigel Farrage can be good for a laugh to be honest, unlike yourself unfortunately.
Click to expand...


No surprise that musterion, who's been repeatedly taken in by fake news and had the poor judgment to repost it here without fact-checking it (and without apology) would have just as poor judgment of your intelligence. Oh well.
 
glassjester

glassjester

Well-known member
Arthur Brain said:
What, those are the only options available?

It ain't a game show GJ...

How about those who oppose a welfare system explain just how the impoverished are going to be catered for and just how charity will reach all those in need?

Take it away...
Click to expand...

Does the welfare system do that?
Does it cater to "all those in need" ?
 
G

Grosnick Marowbe

New member
Hall of Fame
annabenedetti said:
No surprise that musterion, who's been repeatedly taken in by fake news and had the poor judgment to repost it here without fact-checking it (and without apology) would have just as poor judgment of your intelligence. Oh well.
Click to expand...

One need not be a Mensa member to see that AB isn't one of the best and brightest.
 
aCultureWarrior

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Farrage will fit right in the Trump administration.

Arthur Brain said:
You'd fit in a pantomime...

'gaystarnews'?!

You know all the sites don't ya?

:dizzy:
Click to expand...

Nigel Farage is a UK Libertarian (who along with Milo Yiannopoulos) musterion goes bonkers over.

‘At least he’s a socialist’: Nigel Farage backs Jeremy Corbyn for Labour leadership
https://www.rt.com/uk/310590-nigel-farage-backs-corbyn/

Don't be upset with me for pointing out that you, musterion, ok doser, patrick jane and Grosnick Marowbe all the fly same socialist rainbow flag.
 
Arthur Brain

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
annabenedetti said:
No surprise that musterion, who's been repeatedly taken in by fake news and had the poor judgment to repost it here without fact-checking it (and without apology) would have just as poor judgment of your intelligence. Oh well.
Click to expand...

Eh, having your intellect disparaged by the likes of Musty & GM is kinda like having your hair criticized by Donald Trump...
 
glassjester

glassjester

Well-known member
Arthur Brain said:
It's what it's designed to do but like any system, it isn't perfect and unfortunately some people slip through it. Now how about you answer my questions?
Click to expand...

You're asking me for my solution to poverty in my country?
That's a tall order, brother. But I'll try.

If you don't want to be permanently poor in America...

1. Graduate high school
2. Get a job.
3. Don't have kids before you're married.

Not committing crimes, and not doing drugs also helps.
 
Arthur Brain

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
glassjester said:
You're asking me for my solution to poverty in my country?
That's a tall order, brother. But I'll try.

If you don't want to be permanently poor in America...

1. Graduate high school
2. Get a job.
3. Don't have kids before you're married.

Not committing crimes, and not doing drugs also helps.
Click to expand...

Well, that would solve everything then.

:plain:
 
glassjester

glassjester

Well-known member
Arthur Brain said:
It's what it's designed to do but like any system, it isn't perfect and unfortunately some people slip through it. Now how about you answer my questions?
Click to expand...

If you're asking for an alternative to the welfare system, then voluntary charity would be more just, I think.

The ends simply do no justify the means. Why forcefully take away one citizen's money and give it to another?

And what rate would be a just one, in your opinion? Should we forcefully take 1% of a man's pay to redistribute? What if the poor remain? Should we take 10%? There will still be poor people, right? Keep taking more, then? 90% of the rich man's pay?

Should we keep taking until no poor people remain? Where to stop, and why?
 
Arthur Brain

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
glassjester said:
If you're asking for an alternative to the welfare system, then voluntary charity would be more just, I think.

The ends simply do no justify the means. Why forcefully take away one citizen's money and give it to another?

And what rate would be a just one, in your opinion? Should we forcefully take 1% of a man's pay to redistribute? What if the poor remain? Should we take 10%? There will still be poor people, right? Keep taking more, then? 90% of the rich man's pay?

Should we keep taking until no poor people remain? Where to stop, and why?
Click to expand...

Voluntary charity would barely make a dent overall and any charitable organization would simply balk at what you suggest. Even with the safety nets in place charity can't reach everyone.

The very same system you bemoan so much is as much there for you should you find yourself out of a job or unable to work.
 
glassjester

glassjester

Well-known member
Arthur Brain said:
I understand that you're either being willfully ignorant or laughably simplistic. Not everybody has access to a good education, or come from stable family backgrounds or have responsible parents etc etc etc...
Click to expand...

Everyone in the USA has access to a free high school education.
And you don't need responsible parents in order to get a job, or to not have kids before being married.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top