heir
TOL Subscriber
Says the person who cannot tell us what is the gospel of his/her salvation!
unfinished business
- Thread starter heir
- Start date
heir
TOL Subscriber
Rightly dividing the word of truth is to be approved unto God (2 Timothy 2:15 KJV). What is the word of truth that you are to study to shew thyself approved by rightly dividing?
heir
TOL Subscriber
Yep! Romans 2:16 In the day when God shall judge the secrets of men by Jesus Christ according to my gospel.
Good post Heir.
As I predicted:
"Show us, punk, where the12, including Judas, ever preached the good news of 1 Cor. 15:1-4 KJV, prior to the dbr, at a time they were preaching the good news/gospel of the kingdom.
Chapter, verse. You won't-all you do is spam sound bytes, cliches, with NADA scripture, to back it up, punk, satanist."-saint John W
Not a peep.
Observe, the above deception.
"the gospel of Paul"=1 Cor. 15:1-4 KJV...
Death
Burial
Resurrectiont
Show us, punk, where the12, including Judas, ever preached the good news of 1 Cor. 15:1-4 KJV, prior to the dbr, at a time they were preaching the good news/gospel of the kingdom.
Show us, punk, where the 12, including Judas, while preaching the gospel/good news, of the kingdom, ever preached:
"Hey, everyone!! The Master is going to do for our/your sins.....Be raised again for our/your justification!!! Believe this good news to be justified!!!"
You cannot, will not. The dbr was hid from the 12, while they were preaching the gospel/good news of the kingdom, for almost 3 years. Peter attempted to prevent the death of the Lord Jesus Christ, part of the foundation of "the gospel of Paul"(your words), 1 Cor. 15:1-4 KJV, and whose death was the basis for his reconciliation. The 12, initially, did not even believe He had risen.
They were not preaching the good news/gospel of 1 Cor. 15:1-4 KJV, "the gospel of Paul," and you cannot show it. The Lord Jesus never taught 1 Cor. 15:1-4 KJV, at least prior to its occurrence.
You cannot show it.
Again:
Chapter, verse. You won't-all you do is spam sound bytes, cliches, with NADA scripture, to back it up, punk, satanist.
Not a peep.
Made up. Deceit. The dbr was hid from the 12, prior to its occurrence, and you made up this spin, jazz of...
"All the apostles had a little different spin with their understanding of the gospel"
They had no clue, while preaching the good news of the kingdom, that He was to die, until much later in the ministry,and did not initially believe that He had risen. They had NADA understanding, of the dbr, as it was hid from them, despite your lie that they just had "a little different spin with their understanding of the gospel." No-they understood none of it-NADA=it was hid from them, deceiver.
....They initially denied the resurrection.....And yet they preached the gospel/good news of the kingdom, for almost 3 years.
Show us, punk, where the 12, including Judas, while preaching the gospel/good news, of the kingdom, ever preached:
"Hey, everyone!! The Master is going to do for our/your sins.....Be raised again for our/your justification!!! Believe this good news to be justified!!!"
Silencio.
=there is only one piece of good news in the bible=satanic
The punk assumes that all the good news, the gospels, in the bible, pertains to salvation.
He made it up, and/or does not know what the word "gospel" means-no other option.
Not yet. How could I be all there if I'm still here?
You're not making sense.
Yes, it's a good thing for Jesus' apostles that Paul went to Jerusalem and got them straightened out on his gospel.
The poor guys had been teaching Jesus' gospel that we must be born of the Spirit to enter God's kingdom.
We all are fortunate that Paul got everyone to preaching his gospel that Jesus died, was buried, and resurrected.
Yes, it's no wonder Paul went to the Gentiles, the Jews would have just looked him and said, "So what?"
Looks as if EPO got plumb scared away.
Ignorance scares easy.
It happens.
heir
TOL Subscriber
He communicated it unto them as in they never heard it before and needed it to be communicated unto them.
The 12 preached the gospel they were supposed to be preaching and to whom (Matthew 10:5-23 KJV)! Why say "poor guys"?
:nono:
Galatians 2:7 But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter;
Galatians 2:8 (For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles
Galatians 2:9 And when James, Cephas, and John, who seemed to be pillars, perceived the grace that was given unto me, they gave to me and Barnabas the right hands of fellowship; that we should go unto the heathen, and they unto the circumcision.
They took their gospel to the circumcision, not Paul's!
I'm not sure what you mean as Paul was sent to the Jew first and also to the Greek with his gospel.
And I went up by revelation and communicated to them that gospel which I preach among the Gentiles, but privately to those who were of reputation lest by any means I might run, or had run, in vain. (Galatians 2:2)
James, Cephas, and John vetted Paul's gospel and extended to Paul and Barnabas the right hand of fellowship.
With the apostles' approval Paul and Barnabas went to the Gentiles with their gospel of God.
Paul preached the gospel of God and Peter preached the gospel of God.
It happens, when the Rifleman, the great/humble saint John W, takes aim, with bullets, from the book..........
Interplanner
Well-known member
heir
TOL Subscriber
Galatians 2:7 KJV says that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto Paul as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter. When those who seemed to be somewhat saw that after Paul communicated that gospel that he preached among the Gentiles to them, they gave unto Paul the right hand of fellowship, but nowhere does it say that they began preaching what Paul did as the power of God! Both Peter and Paul preached the gospel of God, but Peter did not preach the gospel of Christ as the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth.
heir
TOL Subscriber
vs.
Romans 15:20 Yea, so have I strived to preach the gospel, not where Christ was named, lest I should build upon another man's foundation:
Interplanner
Well-known member
If I may: by not complicating the Bible. There is no grammar that supports what you are saying about circ and uncirc. You don't understand Greek cases and the English is not communicating it. But more important: the anchor of each preposition phrase there is 'task.' There is one task to two objects. That NEVER means there is more than one task--in this case, more than one gospel.
nd it is only a few verses from an anathema about any other gospel.
There is one NT gospel (I understand if you think Is 60's 'gospel' applies to the announcement to return from exile, but when the NT comes we find out that has been superceded).
I have answered the layout of the gospel accounts several times, but I guess you don't read it. The Lamb of God could not be missed as a Gospel statement. The first cross-proven miracle (a 'dare' in which a physical event or healing was said to match a declaration about his authority) is Mk 2, and is really the first miracle. He proves his authority to forgive sins. Gospel!
The direct language to Peter about 'blessed are you for my Father has revealed this' means it was WAS being mentioned all along, because he was taking inventory on whether it was 'taking' or not. "It" was the Gospel of being the Messiah, the main two passages about which are richly redemptive: Is 53, Dan 9 (the 6 accomplishments while being cut off for others). How could he take that inventory without having expressed it?
heir
TOL Subscriber
I believe the words on the page mean what they say, as they say it and to whom and there are clearly two gospels in Galatians 2:7 KJV alone!
If anyone preaches "unto you" any other gospel than the gospel Paul preached as being "unto you" let him be accursed! Simple stuff!