Trump Sues Hillary and the Deep State

User Name

Greatest poster ever
Banned
Democrats are evil.

Democrats are the party of sodomy (gay marriage)
By that standard, Republicans are also evil because 55% of Republicans support gay marriage:


And look at this tweet from the Republican National Committee chair, Ronna McDaniel:

 

Catholic Crusader

Kyrie Eleison
Banned
ironic that the richest man in the world is just waking up to facts known to the rest of us for years and years and years

I think that these powerful people really are unaware of stuff. They are busy in their powerful circles, they dont sit and read real news, many of them really are clueless I think, until some event draws them in
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
By that standard, Republicans are also evil because 55% of Republicans support gay marriage:


And look at this tweet from the Republican National Committee chair, Ronna McDaniel:

Trump himself was supportive of the LGBTQ community, probably for self serving purposes, well, definitely for self serving purposes but hey. Support for gay marriage is hardly a "leftist" thing etc.
 

annabenedetti

like marbles on glass
Trump himself was supportive of the LGBTQ community, probably for self serving purposes, well, definitely for self serving purposes but hey. Support for gay marriage is hardly a "leftist" thing etc.

donald-trump-lgbt-flag-ap-jt-170726_4x3_992.jpg
 

User Name

Greatest poster ever
Banned

User Name

Greatest poster ever
Banned

President Trump Sues Hillary Clinton and Host of Others in RICO Suit Over Russia Collusion Hoax

President Trump filed a federal RICO suit in Miami, Florida Thursday against Hillary Clinton and others over the Russia collusion hoax orchestrated by the Clinton campaign in 2016 to undermine Trump’s candidacy and derail his presidency.

A federal judge in Florida has tossed a racketeering lawsuit that Donald Trump filed against Hillary Clinton and a slew of other defendants—dismantling his claims one by one in an absolutely withering critique.

“It is not simply that I find the Amended Complaint ‘inadequate in any respect,’” Judge Donald Middlebrooks writes at one point. “It is inadequate in nearly every respect.”

“More troubling, the claims presented in the Amended Complaint are not warranted under existing law. In fact, they are foreclosed by existing precedent, including decisions of the Supreme Court,” Middlebrooks writes.

Over the course of a 65-page ruling, Middlebrooks eviscerates Trump’s various arguments, detailing how his claims are outside the statute of limitations, lack standing, twist reasoning, defy known facts, or misinterpret the law.

Trump filed the suit in March alleging that Clinton and the others “orchestrated a malicious conspiracy to disseminate patently false and injurious information” about his campaign’s possible collusion with Russia.

Trump had no immediate comment on the dismissal.

 

User Name

Greatest poster ever
Banned

A judge dismissed Donald Trump's racketeering lawsuit against Hillary Clinton and hinted that his attorneys could be penalized for bringing the case:

 

marke

Well-known member
By that standard, Republicans are also evil because 55% of Republicans support gay marriage:


And look at this tweet from the Republican National Committee chair, Ronna McDaniel:

All supporters of gay marriage displease God by supporting wickedness.
 

marke

Well-known member
A federal judge in Florida has tossed a racketeering lawsuit that Donald Trump filed against Hillary Clinton and a slew of other defendants—dismantling his claims one by one in an absolutely withering critique.

“It is not simply that I find the Amended Complaint ‘inadequate in any respect,’” Judge Donald Middlebrooks writes at one point. “It is inadequate in nearly every respect.”

“More troubling, the claims presented in the Amended Complaint are not warranted under existing law. In fact, they are foreclosed by existing precedent, including decisions of the Supreme Court,” Middlebrooks writes.

Over the course of a 65-page ruling, Middlebrooks eviscerates Trump’s various arguments, detailing how his claims are outside the statute of limitations, lack standing, twist reasoning, defy known facts, or misinterpret the law.

Trump filed the suit in March alleging that Clinton and the others “orchestrated a malicious conspiracy to disseminate patently false and injurious information” about his campaign’s possible collusion with Russia.

Trump had no immediate comment on the dismissal.

It seems the wicked are getting away with all sorts of wickedness right now but Jesus is returning soon to judge the wicked for their wickedness. Thank God.
 

marke

Well-known member
A judge dismissed Donald Trump's racketeering lawsuit against Hillary Clinton and hinted that his attorneys could be penalized for bringing the case:

America is fast becoming a lawless fascist socialist democrat banana republic where opponents of democrats are in danger of being jailed for their opposition.
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
A federal judge in Florida has tossed a racketeering lawsuit that Donald Trump filed against Hillary Clinton and a slew of other defendants—dismantling his claims one by one in an absolutely withering critique.

“It is not simply that I find the Amended Complaint ‘inadequate in any respect,’” Judge Donald Middlebrooks writes at one point. “It is inadequate in nearly every respect.”

“More troubling, the claims presented in the Amended Complaint are not warranted under existing law. In fact, they are foreclosed by existing precedent, including decisions of the Supreme Court,” Middlebrooks writes.

Over the course of a 65-page ruling, Middlebrooks eviscerates Trump’s various arguments, detailing how his claims are outside the statute of limitations, lack standing, twist reasoning, defy known facts, or misinterpret the law.

Trump filed the suit in March alleging that Clinton and the others “orchestrated a malicious conspiracy to disseminate patently false and injurious information” about his campaign’s possible collusion with Russia.

Trump had no immediate comment on the dismissal.

Poor baby's probably in too much of a tantrum to address it yet...
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Well, here's a thought, don't defend the previous embarrassment to the oval office with loony suggestions of election fraud to the point of getting hit with lawsuits in excess of a billion dollars, don't hold ridiculous press conferences outside adult book stores, do turn up for court appearances and pay back your ex wife the money you owe. That should sort things.
 

marke

Well-known member
Well, here's a thought, don't defend the previous embarrassment to the oval office with loony suggestions of election fraud to the point of getting hit with lawsuits in excess of a billion dollars, don't hold ridiculous press conferences outside adult book stores, do turn up for court appearances and pay back your ex wife the money you owe. That should sort things.
Crooked or inept election officials lost or destroyed thousands of photo records from election machines making it impossible to prove they did not violate election laws by passing single ballots through machines multiple times as observers claimed in sworn depositions. Losing, misplacing, or destroying data from voting machines that are required by law to be preserved is a clear violation of election laws and thus, voting fraud.
 
Top