timeline of the apocalypse

chrysostom

chrysostom

Well-known member
Hall of Fame
the timeline may be the only way to show that the pieces fit
-
only history can confirm the fulfillment of prophecy
-but-
you interpretation must be literal
-
it is the only thing you can trust
 
I

Interplanner

Well-known member
chrysostom said:
the timeline may be the only way to show that the pieces fit
-
only history can confirm the fulfillment of prophecy
-but-
you interpretation must be literal
-
it is the only thing you can trust
Click to expand...





There is no timeline. There is 2 Peter 3.

The Rev was written to comfort those in 1st century Judea who had lost everything in the 'rebellion that desolates' of Dan 8, which took place in Judea at that time. The bride is now married in the reign of Christ, but the NHNE have not yet been made. There is a short rebellion that harasses believers at the end of this earth's time.

Mt 24A (up to v29) and its parallels is also about 1st century Judea, with all its direct, urgent, Judean warnings. After v29 the setting is worldwide, the judgement of the whole world, which was originally expected to be right after A but was delayed...as we know.
 
chrysostom

chrysostom

Well-known member
Hall of Fame
you might take a closer look at your interpretation
-if-
you are not finding any fulfillment of prophecy in history
 
chrysostom

chrysostom

Well-known member
Hall of Fame
SaulToPaul said:
:chuckle:

If your interpretation finds fulfillment in the past, you might want to take a closer look at the details of the prophecy, and take God's word more seriously...
Click to expand...

my interpretation is literal and all the pieces fit
there are many pieces
what more do you need?
 
oatmeal

oatmeal

Well-known member
chrysostom said:
timeline of the apocalypse

30 john the baptist writes the first apocalypse
67 new jerusalem, rev 21:2, linus replaces peter in rome
68 first of seven heads, end of the first dynasty julio-claudian, rev 17:10
96 second of the seven heads, end of flavian dynasty

192 third of the seven heads, end of the adoptive and antonine emperors
235 fourth of the seven heads, end of House of Severus
312 rider of the white horse, constantine, rev 6:2
313 paganism the first beast mortally wounded, edict of milan, rev 13:3
330 the thousand year reign begins, rev 20:2
364 fifth of the seven heads tetrarchy and the House of Constantine
400 five have fallen, one is, and one is yet to come, rev 17:10
455 sixth of the seven heads House of Valentinian
476 seventh of the seven heads Family of Leo I the Great
622 rider of the red horse, mohammed, rev 6:4
632 the first horn of ten, rev 17:12
637 jerusalem falls to the first horn, Rashidun Caliphate
661 the second horn, Umayyad Caliphate
666 the first siege of constantinople, rev 15:2
717 the second siege of constantinople
750 the third horn, Abbasid Caliphate
868 the fourth horn, Tulunid and Fatimid Dynasties in Egypt
973 Ifriqiya and Sicily, end of horn number 5

1194 Seljuk Empire ends, horn number 6
1269 Almoravid and Almohad Dynasties in Maghreb ends, horn number 7
1299 ottoman dynasty starts
1390 first siege of constantinople by ottoman dynasty
1411 second siege
1422 third
1453 fourth and constantinople is fallen, rev 18:2
1453 end of the thousand years, rev 20:7
1736 Safavid dynasty ends, horn number 8
1848 rider of the black horse, marx, father of communism, rev 6:4
1857 Mughal Empire ends, horn number 9
1922 Ottoman Empire ends, horn number 10
1930 and shall be found no more at all, rev 18:21, the end of constantinople, babylon the great

now under construction

back to

the apocalypse
Click to expand...

What is your evidence that your time line is correct?

After all, there is no scriptural evidence that Simon Peter, ie, Cephas, was in Rome ever.
 
chrysostom

chrysostom

Well-known member
Hall of Fame
SaulToPaul said:
:chuckle:

They do not fit, unless you ignore 90% of the details.
Click to expand...

the details that I present have been recorded by historians -
whether or not they fit the prophesy depends completely on your interpretation of it -
what happens in the future will always fit yours
 
T

Truster

New member
chrysostom said:
what historians have written -
they all have peter in rome -
at least the respectable ones do
Click to expand...

The scriptures (respectable ones) have Paul in Rome, but not Peter.

Yes, I know tradition says he was put to death in Rome, but tradition is not reliable evidence. If Peter was intended to form a line of succession I'm certain that the Holy Spirit would have given us just a glimmer of this.

Yes, we have the prophecy of the keys and this was fulfilled at Pentecost and at the home of Cornelius. Peter used the keys (evangelism) to open the door for the Jews first and then the Gentiles.

Amen.
 
T

Truster

New member
chrysostom said:
do you think peter went to babylon?
Click to expand...

I have never given it my valuable consideration or contemplation. If that's what you mean by "think".

There seems to be a problem when pressing enter and it has, on this occasion, led to a reposting. My apologies.
 
SaulToPaul 2

SaulToPaul 2

Well-known member
chrysostom said:
the details that I present have been recorded by historians -
whether or not they fit the prophesy depends completely on your interpretation of it -
what happens in the future will always fit yours
Click to expand...

:chuckle:

You leave out 90% of the details of the prophecy, in order to promote your harebrained scheme.
Why?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top