In spite of ignorant claims to the contrary, the Durham investigation is a criminal investigation that will likely result in jail time for the offenders. Some avenues of hope of avoiding jail for the criminal leftist offenders may be if the democrats can obstruct the investigation, shut it down, delay it indefinitely, or influence judges and juries not to find democrat criminals guilty in spite of the evidence to the contrary.
The Durham criminal investigation: Several under investigation may go to jail
- Thread starter marke
- Start date
The fruits of the Durham investigation will reportedly be disclosed later this summer, or in the fall. The bottom line is that (1) the probe as it developed is not one that should have been conducted by a federal prosecutor conducting a criminal investigation, and (2) Barr’s tendentious running commentary on the investigation violates Justice Department rules, politicized the investigation and damaged the credibility of whatever Durham uncovers.
www.lawfareblog.com
The Durham Investigation: What We Know and What It Means
The investigation as it developed should not have been conducted by a federal prosecutor, and Attorney General Barr’s public commentary has seriously (and somewhat
I see you are accusing Durham of doing the same things Mueller and his cadre of democrat wolves did in attempting to wickedly frame Trump and his associates for crimes they did not commit.The fruits of the Durham investigation will reportedly be disclosed later this summer, or in the fall. The bottom line is that (1) the probe as it developed is not one that should have been conducted by a federal prosecutor conducting a criminal investigation, and (2) Barr’s tendentious running commentary on the investigation violates Justice Department rules, politicized the investigation and damaged the credibility of whatever Durham uncovers.
The Durham Investigation: What We Know and What It Means
The investigation as it developed should not have been conducted by a federal prosecutor, and Attorney General Barr’s public commentary has seriously (and somewhat
There was no "framing" involved. Mueller "has indicted, convicted or gotten guilty pleas from 34 people and three companies, including top advisers to President Trump, Russian spies and hackers with ties to the Kremlin." -- https://time.com/5556331/mueller-investigation-indictments-guilty-pleas/
Mueller indicted Russians he knew would never contest the false allegations in court. At least that was until one of those indicted actually showed up to contest his false allegations and Mueller dropped the charges because he never had a case. Others pleaded guilty under unjust pressure, but certainly not all pleaded guilty and most of his cases had nothing to do with Trump or with Russian collusion.
Mueller got some guilty pleas from insignificant individuals on minor charges based upon overheated prosecutions for crimes that would never have been brought on democrats for the same ' offenses.' Manafort was found guilty of committing a crime during the Obama administration that was investigated during the Obama administration without charges being brought. Manafort was targeted by Mueller and the democrats because of his connection to Trump but his democrat partner who committed the same offenses was never charged. Furthermore, Manafort's crime had nothing to do with Trump or the Trump investigation.
Roger Stone and Micheal Flynn were railroaded by corrupt democrat prosecutors and found guilty unjustly by corrupt democrat juries, judges, investigators, Justice officials, and so forth.
Others were caught in Justice Department frame-up schemes and falsely charged and convicted. Those false charges and convictions are now the basis of multi-million dollars in damages lawsuits against the guilty government officials who ran the schemes.