Surely you should know how the word 'predict' is used in science to refer to a derivation from theory that can be tested (refuted or supported) by observation or experiment.
We know you're desperate to avoid the relevant challenges you've been issued, so we might be willing to engage on side issues while you prepare something sensible to contribute.
However, your side issues are nonsense.
How about you read what I said again and try something rational in response, because this rubbish is nothing but a sad attempt to assert your primacy.
Do you ever do anything other than play silly games?
The central claim he made — although he left off the "therefore" — was that
relativity alone could predict the behavior of mercury.
This is patently false, even without knowing another idea that could provide such a prediction.
Your attempt to mock my understanding of a word shows that you spent no time trying to comprehend me, just as you spent no time attempting a rational response to the request to establish relativity, or even name Einstein's paper that claimed to do so.
Try engaging constructively with the discussion for once. :up:
Sent from my SM-A520F using
TOL mobile app
