A new SCOTUS decision reverses a lower court decision, proving court decisions are subject to bias, interpretation, value, and authority. Arizona democrats openly defied court orders in order to block the investigation into voter fraud. If they can defy court orders, then anyone should be able to defy court orders, especially court orders that are based upon fickle polls and popular feelings, opinions and emotions and not upon inviolable Biblical and Constitutional principles.
www.theepochtimes.com
Unanimously ruling against a Chinese asylum claimant, the Supreme Court reversed the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, finding that immigration judges don’t have to explicitly state that an asylum seeker’s story isn’t credible when finding against him.
The court’s opinion in the case, Garland v. Dai, court file 19-1155, was written by Justice Neil Gorsuch.
“The Ninth Circuit has long applied a special rule in immigration disputes,” Gorsuch wrote.
“The rule provides that, in the absence of an explicit adverse credibility determination by an immigration judge or the Board of Immigration Appeals, a reviewing court must treat a petitioning alien’s testimony as credible and true.”
Supreme Court Rules Asylum Applicants Bear Burden of Proof, Reversing 9th Circuit
Unanimously ruling against a Chinese asylum claimant, the Supreme Court reversed the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, finding ...
www.theepochtimes.com
The court’s opinion in the case, Garland v. Dai, court file 19-1155, was written by Justice Neil Gorsuch.
“The Ninth Circuit has long applied a special rule in immigration disputes,” Gorsuch wrote.
“The rule provides that, in the absence of an explicit adverse credibility determination by an immigration judge or the Board of Immigration Appeals, a reviewing court must treat a petitioning alien’s testimony as credible and true.”