implied consent by "they let me do it"
If you can't even fool the people around you that you are a woman even though you are a man, than you deserve to be criticized going into a restroom you do not belong in.
^
Not going to fly.
And
You're dumb for supporting such a thing :wave2:
Which is more a menace to society...gun wielding nut-job bigot with itchy trigger issues or a transgender going to the girls restroom?
That's his assessment. The fact that no one has punished him for it yet doesn't equal consent.
If there are moans of pleasure and not a sign of resistance, I would call that consent.
I was under the impression that women's washrooms are filled with cubicles such that "Nick M's" 2 girls would never share their private space with others, nor would they they even be aware of the sexual orientation of the sexual orientation of the person in the next stall!
Can "Nick M" actually produce any documented cases of adult men actually sexually assaulting women/girls in women's washrooms?
Given the nature of President Trump's recorded comments boasting about "groping" women, he would be last on my list of "grown men" that I would trust alone with MY DAUGHTER!"
Can "Nick M" actually produce any documented cases of adult men actually sexually assaulting women/girls in women's washrooms?
Mrs Bill Clinton said:Every survivor of sexual assault deserves to be heard, believed, and supported.
That's his assessment. The fact that no one has punished him for it yet doesn't equal consent.
this reversal actually has to do with open space locker rooms in public schools, nice try though
What source did you use for that piece of untruthful information Jeffrey?
every news source, Trump reversed(technically a withdrawal) a threatening letter written by Obama that allowed boys in girls locker rooms and restrooms in public schools
I think I see why you have problems with women.
So it does involve more than just "open space locker rooms" like you previously quoted.
I think I see why you have problems with women.
Yep; the standard rapist's assertion is that the victim actually wanted to be raped and was only faking resistence.
To such a deranged mind; said sounds of resistence are reinterpreted by their already depraved state of mind when the rape takes place, as "sounds of consent."
But leave it to the extremist observing such things from afar to conclude on them from a one-sided standard not unlike that of the rapist's.
what exactly are you trying to refute and get at? you called my whole statement untruthful, so I responded with more specific facts but the bulk of the controversy is centered around the locker rooms