• This is a new section being rolled out to attract people interested in exploring the origins of the universe and the earth from a biblical perspective. Debate is encouraged and opposing viewpoints are welcome to post but certain rules must be followed. 1. No abusive tagging - if abusive tags are found - they will be deleted and disabled by the Admin team 2. No calling the biblical accounts a fable - fairy tale ect. This is a Christian site, so members that participate here must be respectful in their disagreement.

Post-Flood Era

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
Huh, I wonder what this falling rocky debris could possibly have been, at the "dawn" of human civilization...


Almost like there was some sort of catastrophe that occurred that destroyed much of the earth and civilization, during its propagation afterwards, encountered some of the aftermath of the debris that was launched...
 

Ps82

Well-known member
Just a thought - no science. Isn't it interesting how The Lord manifested the animals in Genesis 2 and then brought them to Adam to name? And again just before the flood God called the animals he wanted to save and brought them to Noah for the voyage. No wonder dinosaurs and all sorts of creatures are found fossilized all over the world deep in the earth after the flood spread them everywhere. God called most of them by twos except for extra for food for Noah's family. I'm guessing - maybe extras of some to start small herds in the future. You know I've heard people say perhaps the animals were babies ... I've wondered if they were two pregnant females carrying two male babes. Just pondering. God could do it. I'm definitely a creationist believer.
 

Avajs

Active member
2 of every unclean animal and 14 of every clean animal. Although Genesis 6 just specifies 2 of each. Looks like the numbers got clarified in Genesis 7.
 

Right Divider

Body part
Just a thought - no science. Isn't it interesting how The Lord manifested the animals in Genesis 2 and then brought them to Adam to name?
Why to consistently use unbiblical language to describe events and actions in the Bible?

The Lord God did NOT "manifest the animals"... He MADE them (first described in Genesis 1).

Again, I ask... are you a JW or an SDA?
 

inthebeginning

New member
I have read the books of Velikovsky, who was mentioned at the beginning of David Talbott participation.

For the ones who don't know the events of 1950s, when Velikovsky book "Worlds in Collision" was published, his presentation of planet Venus as the cause of the biblical event known as the ten plagues of Egypt, this publication caused so much revolt that scientists and historians grouped themselves to attack that book, even demanding to stop its publication.

Before Velikovsky, scientists were very happy teaching the solar system has been the same for millions of years. Velikovsky using legends from around the world, and books including the Bible, demonstrated that very recently our solar system have suffered a huge change due to the intervention of planet Venus orbiting in disparate way and changing the orbit of planet Mars.

The reading shows lots coincidences between the legends' narrations worldwide, this includes the Aztecs and Mayans, Chinese and even Greeks. His first book became a best seller in New York. He became so famous that universities started sending him invitations for him to explain his new "theory"

Unfortunately, scientists found the way to stop most of his publications, and they published a book "Scientists against Velikovsky" where in the introduction Asimov gives a warning for scientists and institutions of science of not jumping to the train of Velikovsky because if they do so they can lose the funds for their studies and experiments.

It was a war. Vlikovsky defended himself very well and no one was capable to put him down. Finally, he got old and a young opponent finally overcame the debate. It was an abuse, Velikovsky was barely capable to responds challenges.

From here, when Velikovsky died without glory because his discoveries (which were many), other scientists decades later started to steal his ideas and discoveries. We have Hubble, as an example, who using a camcorder, with his wife I think, walked towards an ancient temple and showed that those rocks actually are meteorites. He made the whole presentation as his "discovery". But it happens that such is what Velikovsky wrote in his book, saying that temples walls were made using meteorites because those rocks came from heaven, in other words, from "god(s)".

Now well, Velikovsky explains that a worldwide "amnesia" happened after each catastrophe in the world, and many people practically forgot about those by several reasons. This is very acceptable, in former pandemics, it was the Catholic Church the one preserving the culture of those times by storage of books in monasteries. In those years of pandemics people forgot art, music, school and more, it was just looking for food and burning anything to make fire and survive the cold weather.

The solar system was way different even before planet Venus passing close to earth in Moses times. Legends say the planet Jupiter illuminated Abraham's path. For this to happen, Jupiter must had been closer to earth.

And this is the question not many can answer: if we see today all the planets the same size as stars from our point of view, and their presence over there doesn't affect us in absolute, then why the ancient people built temples to those gods (planets) and made sacrifices (even human sacrifices) "to calm their fury".

Definitively Velikovsky was right and the current scientific theories about our solar system are no other thing but modern legends. The former ones are way more accurate.
 
Last edited:
Top