"Perhaps we need a new American Revolution to defend marriage"

[Kdall]

Principles of Biology 1 and 2, Human anatomy and physiology advanced level for science majors, microbiology also advanced as well as cellular biology, chemistry 1, and 2, principles of genetics, and endocrinology, in addition to all the pre-requisite classes to those classes.

I clearly wasn't studying to be a vet. None of my classes were called animal biology.

I note you haven't named your classes.

I hadn't no. I will now.

AP Biology in high school
Biology 1 and 2
Genetics
Microbiology
Vertebrate Anatomy
Chemistry 1 and 2
Organic Chemistry 1 and 2
Human Physiology
Geology
Human Anatomy
Biochemistry
Astronomy

Obviously along with pre-requisites and associated labs

I'll throw in Understanding the Scriptures and Truth of Scripture (Religion 1 and 2) to show that I studied the different interpretations of the Bible, also

I guess I win

 

[Kdall]

You demanded a scripture that claims man and animals were different and also claimed none existed, nice try at moving the goalposts.

Admit you were wrong.

I'm wrong if you also consider birds and fish to not be animals. Is that what your classes taught you was the case? It sure isn't what mine taught me

 

[Angel4Truth]

I hadn't no. I will now.

AP Biology in high school
Biology 1 and 2
Genetics
Microbiology
Vertebrate Anatomy
Chemistry 1 and 2
Organic Chemistry 1 and 2
Human Physiology
Geology
Human Anatomy
Biochemistry
Astronomy

Obviously along with pre-requisites

I guess I win

What did you win? :rotfl:

 

[Kdall]

What did you win? :rotfl:

I've had more classes in regards to the subject. And you obviously didn't pay attention in yours if you think that humans aren't biologically animals

 

[everready]

That they aren't. But we know for a fact that they are. What category do you classify them under?


You're making a pretty miserable case for the literal truth of scripture

What does God call them?


everready

 

[Angel4Truth]

I'm wrong if you also consider birds and fish to not be animals. Is that what your classes taught you was the case? It sure isn't what mine taught me

Wow, so intellectually dishonest... you forgot what you said?

And where did He explicitly state, "You are not animals"? He said you will dominion over all the creatures, but never said that we weren't animals.

At any rate, if you insist that God said that people aren't biologically animals, then God is wrong.

I responded:

1 Corinthians 15:39 For not all flesh is the same, but there is one kind for humans, another for animals, another for birds, and another for fish.

Seems like both of you are ignorant to me.

Keep trying to act like people said other than what they did. Now you get to be on ignore, i dont have debates with losers who move goalposts each time they cant handle the answer they asked for. :wave2:

 

[Kdall]

Wow, so intellectually dishonest... you forgot what you said?



I responded:



Keep trying to act like people said other than what they did. Now you get to be on ignore, i dont have debates with losers who move goalposts each time they cant handle the answer they asked for. :wave2:

Yes, and the Bible also says that birds and fish aren't animals, which we both know to be false. Therefore, either the Bible is right and scientists have been falsely classifying humans (primates, actually), birds, and fish as animals instead of.....I guess protists?
OR
I'm right and humans, fish, and birds ARE animals. Take your pick


As you are ignoring me for your own inability to answer a simple question, everready's response will be substituted for your own. And it's wrong


Scientists have some serious thinking to do on what category humans actually belong in, you know, since the Bible is always literal and inerrant. What do you think we fit in best? Plantae, fungi, archaea, bacteria, or Protista?

Have a lovely, blissfully-ignorant-of-facts life, Angel

 

[Kdall]

What does God call them?


everready

Thank you for participating, but if you think that birds and fish aren't animals, then you have little to offer in the way of scientific credibility

 

[genuineoriginal]

Fun fact: science is responsible for all medications, space exploration, technology, and so on in the past 200 years. It's responsible for your computer that you're typing this on

What does that have to do with the OP?

 

[The Horn]

This is all poppycock . Marriage does not need to be "defended ".
On the contrary , it's the rights of gay people in America which need defense, because they are under attack by hommophobic bigots like Reilly and other right-wing jerks .
Saying that marriage needs to be "defended " because of same sex marriag e is as idiotic as saying that white male voting rights needs to be defended because blacks people and women have the vote .
How the heck does allowing gay people to marry "harm" marriage or interfere with the rights of married straight people ?It doesn't .
How does SSM prevent opposute sex couples from getting married and having children ? It doesn't .
How does SSM harm children ? It doesn't . There is not one shred of evidence that being raised by gay couples is in any way "harmful" to children or that it will "make them gay " or put them at risk of sexual abuse . There is a whole generation of teenagers and young adults who have been raised by gay couples, and they are doing fine .

 

[Granite]

With all the problems we have as a country it pretty much demonstrates how utterly screwed we are when someone proposes a revolution because more people can now get married.

We deserve everything we get.

 

[Kdall]

Science has been quite wrong about a lot of things in the last two hundred years.

Like?


Fun fact: science is responsible for all medications, space exploration, technology, and so on in the past 200 years. It's responsible for your computer that you're typing this on

What does that have to do with the OP?

Nothing. I answered your statement. Forget?

 

[The Barbarian]

I haven't had any activists knocking on my door, telling me that my heterosexual marriage is over.

And my daughter is getting married this month, and no homosexuals are threatening her for marrying her boyfriend.

So what exactly are we trying to defend?

Other than the unfortunate government involvement, there's no issue at all. If two guys or two women "get married", it's not a threat to my marriage. Regardless of what the state says, marriage is what it always was.

 

[Stripe]

Defending marriage is a dumb idea.

Recriminalizing homosexuality is the way to go. :up:

 

[The Barbarian]

Charter member of the "my sin is nicer than your sin" club writes:

Recriminalizing homosexuality is the way to go.

Stipe, think. What if they recriminalized lying? You'd be sharing a room with Bubba.

 

[genuineoriginal]

Nothing. I answered your statement. Forget?

My posts were still on topic, but you have already forgotten that.
Here they are again:

Homosexuality is not common, but it does arise with greater frequency in unnatural environments, like a zoo, or in populations where the male-female ratio is out of balance with the male-female mate ratio, such as when one male has many female mates, but there are an equal number of male and females, leaving males without mates.


You seem to be confusing an environment that promotes people thinking about homosexual sex with genetics.
Homosexuality is a social disease, not a genetic one.

That's your opinion, and science says you're wrong

Science has been quite wrong about a lot of things in the last two hundred years.

 

[Stripe]

Charter member of the "my sin is nicer than your sin" club writes:Stipe, think. What if they recriminalized lying? You'd be sharing a room with Bubba.

Nope. Lying should only be criminal when it is done to a judge in a criminal case.

And we know you hate scripture, which says homosexuality is a sin and a crime.

 

[The Barbarian]

Stipe writes:

Nope. Lying should only be criminal when it is done to a judge in a criminal case.

(Stipe is a member of the "my sin is nicer than your sin" club)

Stipe hates scripture, because it tells him to take the beam out of his eye first.

Matthew 7:4 Or how sayest thou to thy brother: Let me cast the mote out of thy eye; and behold a beam is in thy own eye? [5] Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam in thy own eye, and then shalt thou see to cast out the mote out of thy brother' s eye.

Jesus can be such a killjoy, um, Stipe?

 

[Kdall]

My posts were still on topic, but you have already forgotten that.
Here they are again:

As shown previously, I responded to your ridiculous assertion that science as a whole is frequently wrong, then you asked me why I was getting off topic.

 

[Kdall]

Nope. Lying should only be criminal when it is done to a judge in a criminal case.

And we know you hate scripture, which says homosexuality is a sin and a crime.

Hope you've never eaten crab, lobster, or shrimp. That would put you in the same boat with homosexuals according to scripture