Pants on fire?

Danoh

New member
In this video, it's presenter makes a very valid point about the need to establish a Baseline first, that one can then rely on, when attempting to discern when a person is lying.

His point is one I have personally found highly useful over the years, but it is not really covered, (nor how I have personally used it), in the above video (within NLP, which refers to it as as Calibration)

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rQKuD48NPQ8

 

Nick M

Black Rifles Matter
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
I remember watching people go up against machines, and the people easily won. The people being the FBI interrogator and the professional poker player. The polygraph was a coin flip, the audio test was less than half. The "medium" was 25%, or said another way, answered "c" on the 4 choice multiple choice test. The poker player was 65% and the FBI was like 60%. From what I remember.
 

Danoh

New member
I liked that show that was on for a bit, called Lie To Me

lol - you're presently living in, and supporting such a "show."

Case in point, the pants on fire "tells" or various behavioral cues* the man in the red t-shirt clearly manifests, in the video below.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=VAk0GmMA_Lg


Rom. 5:8

_____________________

* See first two posts on reading behavioral cues (eye accessing, body movement, etc.) when attempting to discern lying and or truth telling, and or the need to rationalize that which has been erroneously idealized to a point where it has ended up one's (skewed) perception of reality.
 
Top