WatchmanOnTheWall
Well-known member
They are either not aware of it or have dismissed it without providing their reasons for dismissing it.
Noah’s Ark Found!
- Thread starter WatchmanOnTheWall
- Start date
They are either not aware of it or have dismissed it without providing their reasons for dismissing it.
Copper and tin are the metals in bronze. There is an "aluminum bronze", but that is modern.
I suppose it's got the benefit that Ron Wyatt has a source of income.
Ronald Eldon Wyatt (2 June 1933 – August 4, 1999) was an adventurer noted for advocating the Durupınar site as the site of Noah's Ark, along with almost 100 other alleged Bible related discoveries. These have been dismissed by scientists, historians, biblical scholars, and other creationists, but his work continued to have a following. Much controversy has surrounded him, often times he is labelled a charlatan and fraud. These claims are partly due to the astounding lack of evidence he provided for his finds, combined with the lack of legal permission into dig sites and genuine scientific backing. This is most evident in cases where he claimed to have found an artifact, and then when asked to present it claimed the local government had confiscated it, as with such alleged finds as the Ark of the Covenant, the Pillars erected by Solomon, or the literal blood of Christ, something he claimed to have had tested yet when asked to present official documents never did so...
And etc., more at the source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ron_Wyatt
Yes, the man was a fraud.
WatchmanOnTheWall
Well-known member
On the contrary Ron funded all of his trips and investigations from his own earnings as an anaesthetist.
WatchmanOnTheWall
Well-known member
Love the 'probably'. Rather than just look at the OP you jump to your own conclusion.
WatchmanOnTheWall
Well-known member
And as many others support his findings, that is why each of us must look at the evidence for ourselves, most people don't do this however and just jump to their own unfounded conclusions.
The same can be said of his detractors, a total lack of counter evidence.
That's irrelevant, the evidence speaks for itself.
He had plenty of genuine scientific and expert support.
Total rubbish, the Ark was never moved and is still there, the government were unable to retrieve it. Please check your facts.
One is still there and can be seen on youtube. Again check your facts.
Wrong again, it's all on youtube and why you think a piece of paper would prove this fact shows your total lack of reasoning skills.
:blabla:
:blabla:
As to Ron Wyatt's organization being non-profit and as such having no investors, I spoke to businessmen and television producers who have invested money into Wyatt Archaeological Research for television rights. There have been many tens of thousands of dollars invested in WAR. To date, none of those who invested this money has seen a shred of scientific evidence substantiating Ron Wyatt's claims. Where is the report from the blood sample analysis of what Ron claims is the blood of Jesus Christ? Where is the Ark of the Covenant? Which museum is housing the ancient chariot wheels he claimed to have been from the Red Sea Crossing? There is no evidence because the video is a fraud. On the Noah's Ark video, all the so-called scientific data cannot be duplicated, a clear sign that what was given the labs was false data. (Read John Baumgarten's and Tom Fenner's letter)
http://www.tentmaker.org/WAR/
WatchmanOnTheWall
Well-known member
You'll need to provide proof of this alleged money invested; a citation.
Ron's evidence is all for free on youtube. I posted the Noah's Ark one in the OP which you continue to ignore.
Again what would a piece of paper prove, the evidence was filmed. In a court of law which evidence would gain a conviction?:
A: A piece of paper stating "John stole the car".
Or
B: A film of John stealing the car.
Think about it..
Exactly where Jeremiah left it under where Christ was crucified in the garden tomb where Ron dug as shown on film and the footage of expert analysis of Christ's blood.
Again this shows a total lack of research. The artefacts were never moved, no one has the permission to remove them. They are all still there as shown on film.
Where is you proof that his tests on Noah's Ark could not be replicated? Citation please!
Again you need a citation here.
Just words on a screen, no evidence, unlike the video footage of the artefacts found, and the scientific and expert evidence provided.
WatchmanOnTheWall
Well-known member
delete
You have no sense of irony, do you? Show us the evidence for those wooden ship timbers he claimed to have found. And the evidence those chariot wheels he claimed to have found in the Red Sea. He just collects money from investors, but there's nothing he can produce to show anyone.
Videos are just claims. Anyone can make one. He says he has physical evidence. Why can't anyone see it?
He could shut his critics up by showing the material he claims to have found.
But he can't show us the blood, of course. For these guys, there's always a reason why they can't produce evidence they claim to have.
And "the authorities won't let me show you" is just another dodge.
Every fraud does this.
Well, that settles that.
WatchmanOnTheWall
Well-known member
See the OP video. How many times must you read this before you actually watch it?
Part 2|Red Sea- proof of the supernatural
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d90NM9tgDQE
More Evidence of Chariot Wheels in the Red Sea Found in 2000
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lzb4ekyX1kc
Citation need again.
Again you need to actually watch the videos first, if you can't this time you are clearly trolling.
You are wrong, a claim is:
claim
verb
state or assert that something is the case, typically without providing evidence or proof.
Video is however often used as evidence in court cases etc. Claims can not be used as evidence.
And they have, others have filmed these artefacts too.
Millions have seen the videos and gone to see these artefacts for themselves. When you have watch the videos you too will have seen them.
You do know Ron died nearly 20 years ago?
Again it's all there for you to see. You do know how to watch youtube don't you?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQ1fK-3nwJ0
If you're referring to the Ark of the covenant which is the only artefact that is not on film then I have already explained that to you. The authorities tried to retrieve it but were prevented from obtaining it. It is explained in the above VT.