I don't answer to ghetto dwellers, Buckwheat.
Mr. Santorum: Please Re-Think Abortion Regulations
- Thread starter Jefferson
- Start date
I don't answer to ghetto dwellers, Buckwheat.
I see Willy Billy Jim Bob is back after a full day of sloppin the hogs.
Crack open one of them thar Billy Beers and join in on the conversation.
I already have a beer.
And everyone is waiting for YOU to join the conversation for a change instead of posting your usual drivel.
I'm sure they're not holding their breath....
WizardofOz
New member
You claim I didn't acknowledge it. Is that true or another alaCarte bold face lie?
Ron Paul isn't the perfect candidate, he is the best candidate. I don't defend homosexuality so stop lying. I've told you before that I think it's a sin to engage in homosexual activity. Focus on that when you attack me, not on what Ron Paul said.
Should I claim that you support abortion in New York because your candidate does? It would be fair to say so, right?
:hammer:
Laws against bestiality and incest exist in the US. Therefore, they should be enforced. What laws against homosexuality? With no law there is no enforcement...:duh:
Fallacious argument; argument from silence. Learn proper debate.
Quote:
You want laws against incest and bestiality enforced, but not laws against homosexuality.
Laws against bestiality don't exist in every State, many have animal cruelty laws instead. Homosexual behavior has been outlawed throughout the history of western civilzation, only becoming legal around the time abortion did in the early 1970s (what a coincidence, who would have thought that homosexuality and abortion would have that common denominator: SEXUAL IMMORALITY).
Quote:
I can point out dozens of posts that you've made against abortion, but not one supporting traditional morality (anti pornography, anti homosexual behavior, support of traditional marriage).
Gee Ralphie, if you were to ask me to provide posts promoting traditional morality, i.e. exposing the homosexual agenda, exposing the abortion movement, exposing the pornography movement, or even talking about the fraud behind the religion of Islam, I wouldn't fall back on "fallacious argument; argument from silence. Learn proper debate",
I would have PROVIDED THEM. But then, when there's nothing to provide in the way of proof...
You want laws against incest and bestiality enforced, but not laws against homosexuality.
Laws against bestiality don't exist in every State, many have animal cruelty laws instead. Homosexual behavior has been outlawed throughout the history of western civilzation, only becoming legal around the time abortion did in the early 1970s (what a coincidence, who would have thought that homosexuality and abortion would have that common denominator: SEXUAL IMMORALITY).
Quote:
I can point out dozens of posts that you've made against abortion, but not one supporting traditional morality (anti pornography, anti homosexual behavior, support of traditional marriage).
Gee Ralphie, if you were to ask me to provide posts promoting traditional morality, i.e. exposing the homosexual agenda, exposing the abortion movement, exposing the pornography movement, or even talking about the fraud behind the religion of Islam, I wouldn't fall back on "fallacious argument; argument from silence. Learn proper debate",
I would have PROVIDED THEM. But then, when there's nothing to provide in the way of proof...
WizardofOz
New member
Not everyone rants quite like you do. Your argument from silence is just as fallacious as it was 5 minutes ago.
Unless I can find evidence of a person condemning something, that means they condone it, is this your new "logic"?
Your ignorance has reached new heights.
Congrats
lain:
Not everyone rants quite like you do. Your argument from silence is just as fallacious as it was 5 minutes ago.
Unless I can find evidence of a person condemning something, that means they condone it, is this your new "logic"?
Your ignorance has reached new heights.
Congrats
Quoted for truth. :devil:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/...on-birth-control-social-issues_n_1284176.html
There are signs that he is on the right page.
There are signs that he is on the right page.
"Many of Christian faith have said, `Well, that's OK. Contraception is OK,'" he said. "It's not OK. It's a license to do things in the sexual realm that is counter to how things are supposed to be. ... If it's not for purposes of procreation, then you diminish this very special bond between men and women."
Sounds like a leftist pro baby killing/pro sodomite to me Nick. (pre-coffee sarcasm at work here).
WizardofOz
New member
One sentence, two lies. New record?
Congrats
Speaking of leftist pro baby killing/pro sodomites.
Contain sexual immorality and you'll contain abortion.
You were exposed as a pro life fraud long ago, I'll be taking a step further to expose you and others like you soon.
WizardofOz
New member
Who is? Once you start lying, you just can't stop, can you?
I don't want to see abortion "contained", I want to see it criminalized.
:blabla: In the meantime, address this:
Is it true or a lie that I did not acknowledge your post?
What lifestyle do I defend? Please provide evidence other than fallacious assertions and baseless declarations. Otherwise, we can dismiss this as a lie as well.....
:idea:
You should stop lying.
Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Speaking of leftist pro baby killing/pro sodomites.
States rights abortion, no desire to criminalize immoral sexual behavior, or not even criticizing it; the facts are there Ralphie.
Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Contain sexual immorality and you'll contain abortion.
Sorry, but blasphemy and witchcraft first have to be criminalized before we can criminalize other things that God abhors.
Onto other related issues:
What is your stance on 13 year old girls that married in Biblical times?
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Speaking of leftist pro baby killing/pro sodomites.
States rights abortion, no desire to criminalize immoral sexual behavior, or not even criticizing it; the facts are there Ralphie.
Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Contain sexual immorality and you'll contain abortion.
Sorry, but blasphemy and witchcraft first have to be criminalized before we can criminalize other things that God abhors.
Onto other related issues:
What is your stance on 13 year old girls that married in Biblical times?
WizardofOz
New member
One step at a time, alaCarte:
Did I acknowledge it, yes or no?
Offer an example of my defending whatever lifestyle it is that you're referring to.
Quote me. Your argument from silence is fallacious; you should stop using it. If I have defended something, you must have evidence of my defending it.
It's time for you to:
A) Put up
B) Shut up
C) Admit you lied twice in one sentence.
Did I acknowledge it, yes or no?
Offer an example of my defending whatever lifestyle it is that you're referring to.
Quote me. Your argument from silence is fallacious; you should stop using it. If I have defended something, you must have evidence of my defending it.
It's time for you to:
A) Put up
B) Shut up
C) Admit you lied twice in one sentence.
One sentence, two lies. New record?
Congrats
Why do you humor this freak?
Honestly WoZ, you're a complete glutton for punishment. Stop feeding the troll.
WizardofOz
New member
Just calling him out for lying as you currently are in another thread. I guess that make two of us
Notice it shut him up in this thread. He backs himself into a corner and then does his vanishing act. Yes, it's edifying.
Just calling him out for lying as you currently are in another thread. I guess that make two of us
Notice it shut him up in this thread. He backs himself into a corner and then does his vanishing act. Yes, it's edifying.
Eh, fair enough.:cheers:
I did comment on this before succumbing to the urge myself...
As for Mr. Santorum--I do appreciate that he's made this entire farce a lot more entertaining.
Do you have an original thought in that simple mind of yours Ralphie?
I used the term "ala carte Christianity" some time ago. Why do you feel the need to copy a term that I brought to TOL?
Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
I've made my point twice with Dinesh D’Sousa's statement about sexual immorality and abortion, yet you won't acknowledge it
You made some sexist reference to "slutty women", hardly "acknowledging" the problem behind sexual immorality.
Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
(of course not, it would mean defeating a lifestyle that Ralphie defends).
Again, the "Put up or Shut up" line I have used with your buddy the Satanist on numerous occasions. Try to use something other than what I say (or do you have a "daddy fixation" with me Ralphie?).
Your Christian-hating moral relativism is shown throughout the threads of TOL, from the Founding Fathers thread to the Libertarian thread.
You can deny it all you want, I don't need to prove it, as it's more than obvious.
WizardofOz
New member
You are as alaCarte as they come. If you want to claim that you picked your own nickname yourself, I won't argue with you. Every argument you present is riddled with double standards and hypocrisy.
Anyway, I call you alaCarteWarrior, which is different than alaCarte Christianity. :duh:
If the shoe fits....
You lied and said "I've made my point twice with Dinesh D’Sousa's statement about sexual immorality and abortion, yet you won't acknowledge it". Now you're admitting that I did indeed acknowledge (and respond to) it. I also said more than one line about slutty women.
Thank you for admitting that you lied. Will you stop lying now?
If you had evidence you would present it. You don't so you lie and assert and declare because that's what you do.
Funny that you demand evidence of others but cop out when I ask for evidence for your accusations.
More alaCarte double standard we've come to expect from you. :loser: