MADists have to deny the NC, or their MAD doesn't work out.
Therefore, MADists have to claim 2 Cor 3:6 is not referring to the NC, even though everyone except MADists know that it does indeed refer to the NC.
I just now googled Darby's translation and found that although his translation is also lower case; his commentary on the passage was that the new covenant was what was being referred to.
You are just being your same old slandering you.
Tet's ever disgraceful compulsion to introduce some issue into things by which he might turn a thing into, that he might then somehow undermine.
The guy would be a comedy of errors were he not so obviously spiritually corrupt; and what that implies about who he really is in his spirit.
For what I have just described as his tactic is exactly the very tactic described of the Adversary as early as Genesis 3.
I pity you, Tet. And your wife. And especially your children.
You are ever lower than low.
And that can not go well for your family under your corrupt influence.
Not all passages are to be read about what is the personal spiritual impact of this FIRST. Sometimes we need to know that he was referring to movements and thinking around him first, and then apply later, if we can.
I concur with you in principle, however the FIRST shall be the LAST, and the LAST shall be the FIRST. This mountain top sermon lays the groundwork and constitution of the NHNE event, and provides many hard sayings, which when taken literally seem impossible, but if we contort our thinking to morph into a spirtual mindset these sayings can reverberate with your spirits and bring forth lasting modalities of performance on our part and instruction to others. Agreed?