RD see post #142, you made a specific claim. I asked you to support it with a citation (or more if you wish) to the scientific literature. You made the claim, the burden of proof is on you. I'll wait.
Ah RD the ball is in your court. You made a
very specific claim. You stated "It is quite well studied scientifically and confirmed that life does not naturally come into being via physics and chemistry"
I took that to mean you were aware of such scientific studies and their confirmation. I asked for references to those studies and confirmation. Should have been easy-peasy.
And now? Buppkus. Color me surprised.
Ah but you know I shouldn't be since I still wait that list of documents from Stripe to investigate/analyze Jesus resurrection
"Uncontroversial" and yet NO CLUE as to how it "might happen".Abiogenesis, or informally the origin of life,[a] is the natural process by which life has arisen from non-living matter, such as simple organic compounds. While the details of this process are still unknown, the prevailing scientific hypothesis is that the transition from non-living to living entities was not a single event, but an evolutionary process of increasing complexity that involved molecular self-replication, self-assembly, autocatalysis, and the emergence of cell membranes. Although the occurrence of abiogenesis is uncontroversial among scientists, its possible mechanisms are poorly understood. There are several principles and hypotheses for how abiogenesis could have occurred.
Oh dear RD, neither wiki nor AiG are citations to the scientific literature.
Even your wiki reference does not support your claim in post 142. Saying "well, we aren't sure" is not confirming that life did not come into being via physics and chemistry.
The original topic, from the first post, was by one of the
more irrational ToLers. She seemed to be beating around the edges of the hydroplate theory. If you want to use that particular bit of fantasy just shoot me now.
At some point we went to a discussion of whether science dealt with immaterial and/or supernatural things. At some point I suggested your brain worked by chemistry and physics. You claimed that was random and when you eventually agreed that chemistry was not random you stated on my "origin story".
so not really sure there ever was a consistent topic