Howabout where only original languages should be used first as proof?:rapture:I think that you need to start some new threads entitled: 'Pop's theology'...where the original languages are completely ignored as a prerequisite for discussion.
:dog:
Howabout where only original languages should be used first as proof?:rapture:I think that you need to start some new threads entitled: 'Pop's theology'...where the original languages are completely ignored as a prerequisite for discussion.
:dog:
Matt 19:16-26
16 And, behold, one came and said unto him, Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life?
17 And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.
18 He saith unto him, Which? Jesus said, Thou shalt do no murder, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness,
19 Honour thy father and thy mother: and, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
20 The young man saith unto him, All these things have I kept from my youth up: what lack I yet?
21 Jesus said unto him, If thou wilt be perfect, go and sell that thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come and follow me.
22 But when the young man heard that saying, he went away sorrowful: for he had great possessions.
23 Then said Jesus unto his disciples, Verily I say unto you, That a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven.
24 And again I say unto you, It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.
25 When his disciples heard it, they were exceedingly amazed, saying, Who then can be saved?
26 But Jesus beheld them, and said unto them, With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible.
This passage actually is teaching the Truth that Jesus is God ! Notice vs 17 As the young man had addressed Jesus as good, and Jesus responded accordingly, why callest thou me good, for none is good but ONE, that One Being God
Now , notice Jesus did not say, none is good but One and that is my Father, but He said that One, Being God !
Now if Jesus by this is not insinuating that He is God, then the alternative is that He was not good, seeing He just said only ONE, not Two, but ONLY ONE is good.
Now, if Jesus was not good, being that He was not the Only One Good God, then His commanding him, the young ruler, in order to be perfect, that he must go sell all his possessions, then give to the poor, and follow Him; Such an commandment exposed that the young man loved his possessions above God, which was a violation of the very first commandment, now if Jesus was not God, then the young mans refusal to obey and follow Jesus, could not be a proper standard to gauge his Love to God !
For there could not have been nothing amiss about not making such a great sacrifice as that Jesus told him, and then following Him if the One speaking was not the One God, who Only was good !
If Jesus died then he is not God for God can not die.
Paul says he is the image of God, not God.
Jesus Christ is one person in two natures, fully human and fully divine. He died in his humanity, not his divinity. However, since Christ is one person it is proper to say that "God died," so long as we understand that the divine nature did not die.
Likewise it is good to call the Virgin Mary "Mother of God" as she gave birth to God in the flesh.
He is the express image of God the Father. How is that possible? Because he has the same nature as God the Father and is therefore himself God.
"The Word became flesh, and dwelt among us..."
I close with one of my favorite Christian hymns:
Only begotten Son and Immortal Word of God, Who for our salvation willed to be incarnate of the Holy Theotokos and Ever-Virgin Mary; Who without change became man, and were crucified, O Christ our God, trampling down death by death; who are one of the Holy Trinity, glorified with the Father and the Holy Spirit- save us!
Jesus Christ is one person, fully God and fully man. Therefore, to say "Jesus Christ died" is to say "God died." You cannot separate Jesus from God.
"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God."
If you read the Greek there is an article before the God with whom the Logos is. Thus when it says the Logos is Theos it means the Logos bears the nature of the One God, the Father.
What are you saying when you say that Jesus is God?
Nope.
There is no one good but God. That's what it says. We must leave it at what Jesus said. If Jesus was good it was ONLY because God made Jesus to be good. God created everything and said it was good. If God made Jesus good so be it. Overally, there is no one good but God. God sent Jesus to be followed and be the example because Jesus follows God. So it's hard to draw Jesus is God out of this.
~*~*~
Adding to previous commentary here, the question remains.....what does the statement that 'Jesus is God' (!) prove or effect in the greater context of reality as we know it?...besides it being a theological statement or religious assumption.
Jesus the Man by nature is wholly Man, and further called the 'Son of Man'. The whole gesture or motive to totally deify this Man or claiming the human Jesus is 'God' is a fantastic leap of faith, to say nothing of the con-fusion of metaphysics that is required to be involved to hold such a 'hypothesis' or 'hypostatic union' (at which point differentiating between the two is merely 'conceptual').
pj
Please address the points of post 635.