glassjester
Well-known member
Tambora's thread about biology vs. feelings opened up a whole new can of worms.
The overall gist of the opposition to the OP seems to be the claim that no one is objectively male or female. Biologically, no one is a man or a woman.
This, if true, is certainly news to me.
I suspect this would be news, too, to biologists.
So is this true? Does biological sex not exist, objectively?
Several good points in this video.
"I'm not going to modify basic biology because it threatens your subjective sense of what you are."
(In other words, don't tell me I must pretend you are something you are not just to satisfy your "feelings". "Feelings" do not trump truth.)
The overall gist of the opposition to the OP seems to be the claim that no one is objectively male or female. Biologically, no one is a man or a woman.
This, if true, is certainly news to me.
I suspect this would be news, too, to biologists.
So is this true? Does biological sex not exist, objectively?