I support the Alt-Right

[Traditio]

 

[Tambora]

Trad, you've been gone awhile.
Bet you missed my White Lives Matter thread.
http://theologyonline.com/showthread.php?123103-White-Lives-Matter

Got a lot of music, art, and fashion in it.
And then the TOL antifa group showed up to bash it.

 

[Tambora]

Revel in the awesomeness and admit the magnitude of your errors.

Doesn't it just make ya wanna wipe that fuzz off his lip?
That's got to be the wimpiest mustache ever!

Now this right here is a manly mustache!

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
The racist-Jew hating-Christian doctrine hating Alt Right has no problem with an openly homosexual speaker. So much for your wiki copy and paste saying that they're homophobic

You're not a fan of reading, are you? Literally the first sentence from the WIKI is as follows: "The alt-right, or alternative right, is a loosely defined group of people with far-right ideologies"

I've been studying the Alt Right for sometime now (and unlike you, my study didn't involve a Wikipedia article) and the loosely defined group's commonality is:

1. Racism
2. Anti Semitism
3 A hatred of Christianity (what's to love about a religion that accepts people of all colors and has as it's 2nd greatest commandment "Love your neighbor as you'd love yourself"?)

Some are more accepting of gays than others. Milo is a useful idiot as he otherwise champions their (some of the individuals who define themselves as 'alt-right') 'cause'.

The modern day acceptance of homosexuality amongst white supremacists goes back to Adolf Hitler. Many in the white supremacist movement have been homosexuals, although they don't fly their perversion as loud as LGBTQ activist and Alt Right spokesthing Milo Yiannapolous has.

What's really sad is many that profess to be Christian have looked the other way and accepted Milo Yiannopolous as a spokesthing for the conservative movement...

until he defended pedophilia in an interview, at which point they decided that Milo wasn't good PR for their cause.

If we're going to discuss what the alt-right is, wikipedia is as good of a place to start as anywhere else. Do you have an alternative source to offer or are you going to chase your tail all day?

In the event you didn't read this very informative article from a few posts ago.
http://www.dailywire.com/news/9441/...-things-you-michael-knowles?tum_medium=social

 

[annabenedetti]

Tambora.

Let's be real about this.

When were the Nazis ever not the cool guys?

Have you seen their uniforms?

Have you seen their architecture?

Listened to their music?

Unlike the Stalinists, the Nazis had a sense of fashion and what it means to be cool.

Sometimes.

If it wasn't for all those serial killers they had, the Nazis would have been the coolest ever!

Not bad.

Excellent.

Not crazy about that particular video tune.
I'm more a Beethoven, Chopin, Pachelbel kinda gal.

They did dress rather sharp.
But hey, Stalin was way better looking than Hitler.
If I was shown a pic of Hitler today (and didn't know who he was), I would have thought he was gay.
But Stalin, that's a manly looking man there!

Revel in the awesomeness

Trad, you've been gone awhile.
Bet you missed my White Lives Matter thread.
http://theologyonline.com/showthread.php?123103-White-Lives-Matter

Got a lot of music, art, and fashion in it.
And then the TOL antifa group showed up to bash it.

Tambora and Trad, you two deserve each other. You should start a club. It won't cost much, you can get tiki torches and white sheets for pretty cheap. Unless Trad wants to go with the shield and sword look, that'll cost extra. Plywood is expensive these days.

 

[Truster]

When Elohim's judgement brings a government upon a people that causes them to suffer.

Judges 8:33-9:22

 

[Tambora]

Tambora and Trad, you two deserve each other. You should start a club. It won't cost much, you can get tiki torches and white sheets for pretty cheap. Unless Trad wants to go with the shield and sword look, that'll cost extra. Plywood is expensive these days.

Atta girl, Anna! JUMP!
:chuckle:

 

[drbrumley]

Tambora and Trad, you two deserve each other. You should start a club. It won't cost much, you can get tiki torches and white sheets for pretty cheap. Unless Trad wants to go with the shield and sword look, that'll cost extra. Plywood is expensive these days.

And YOU can get those bandanas and masks for relatively cheap as well. along with those baseball bats and such your buddies are using...

Oh and don't forget, even at the convenience store, they usually have 20 ounce water or coke in those bottles and you can take a leak in it and throw at people who YOU have no idea who they are or why they are there, that's free you know.

 

[Nick M]

Just saying.

They oppose all of your propositions. Your misdirection is noted.

 

[WizardofOz]

That's Stripe's line - do you ever say anything original? I know it's the pits being a leftist, but please, Wiz

:doh: What makes me a leftist? We've had this 'discussion' before and you always duck and run when asked for actual evidence of my 'leftism'.

So by all means, the floor is yours...

 

[ClimateSanity]

https://www.infowars.com/video-showing-insanity-of-alt-left-goes-mega-viral/

 

[Rusha]

:doh: What makes me a leftist? We've had this 'discussion' before and you always duck and run when asked for actual evidence of my 'leftism'.

So by all means, the floor is yours...

Simple ... you are not. Words like leftist are used as any easy (lazy) explanation of why someone does not agree with someone else on an issue.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote Originally Posted by WizardofOz
What makes me a leftist? We've had this 'discussion' before and you always duck and run when asked for actual evidence of my 'leftism'.

So by all means, the floor is yours...

Simple ... you are not. Words like leftist are used as any easy (lazy) explanation of why someone does not agree with someone else on an issue.

On social issues, Libertarians like my bestest friend WizardofOz here
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...Tally-Thread&p=5091833&viewfull=1#post5091833

are to the left of democrats (I doubt that you'll find many democrats that want all recreational drugs and prostitution legalized).

On economic issues Libertarians borrow off of Judeo-Christian doctrine and pretend that they're conservative, but Libertarians can't be economically responsible because their extreme stance on social issues is economically irresponsible.

Here's a good one:

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/billykangas/2014/11/5-dimensional.html

Let's compare scores Aaron.

 

[WizardofOz]

Let's:

You are a: Centrist Anti-Government Interventionist Traditionalist Collectivism score: 0% Authoritarianism score: -33% Internationalism score: 33% Tribalism score: 0% Liberalism score: -17% Explanation key: Collectivism refers economic intervention, whether the society or state should intervene in the economy to redistribute wealth from the more to the less successful. The negative percentages indicate opposition to such intervention. Authoritarianism refers to state power to control the actions of individuals to prevent them from harming others or themselves, and also to establish the will of the majority over society. Negative percentages indicate opposition to state power. Internationalism refers to political involvement in other nations or global affairs, either via war, treaty or international organizations. Negative percentages indicate isolationist beliefs, and the belief in national sovereignty. Tribalism refers to identity or nationalism, favoring your own nation over foreigners. Negative percentages indicate opposition to national or ethnic identity and oriented towards pan-humanism. Liberalism refers to acceptance of historically illegal or immoral social practices or customs. Negative percentages indicate opposition to such acceptance.

Let's see yours...

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Let's:

You are a: Centrist Anti-Government Interventionist Traditionalist Collectivism score: 0% Authoritarianism score: -33% Internationalism score: 33% Tribalism score: 0% Liberalism score: -17% Explanation key: Collectivism refers economic intervention, whether the society or state should intervene in the economy to redistribute wealth from the more to the less successful. The negative percentages indicate opposition to such intervention. Authoritarianism refers to state power to control the actions of individuals to prevent them from harming others or themselves, and also to establish the will of the majority over society. Negative percentages indicate opposition to state power. Internationalism refers to political involvement in other nations or global affairs, either via war, treaty or international organizations. Negative percentages indicate isolationist beliefs, and the belief in national sovereignty. Tribalism refers to identity or nationalism, favoring your own nation over foreigners. Negative percentages indicate opposition to national or ethnic identity and oriented towards pan-humanism. Liberalism refers to acceptance of historically illegal or immoral social practices or customs. Negative percentages indicate opposition to such acceptance.

Let's see yours...

My my, someone wasn't honest.

Based on the Libertarian Party Platform and the doctrine that it's based on, there is no way that you're a "centrist".

https://www.lp.org/platform/

Here's mine:

You are a: Right-Leaning Nationalist Reactionary
Collectivism score: -33%
Authoritarianism score: 0%
Internationalism score: 0%
Tribalism score: 33%
Liberalism score: -67%

How about we discuss each question and give our thoughts and we'll see whose ideology makes more sense?

 

[WizardofOz]

My my, someone wasn't honest.

Based on the Libertarian Party Platform and the doctrine that it's based on, there is no way that you're a "centrist".

https://www.lp.org/platform/

Here's mine:

You are a: Right-Leaning Nationalist Reactionary
Collectivism score: -33%
Authoritarianism score: 0%
Internationalism score: 0%
Tribalism score: 33%
Liberalism score: -67%

How about we discuss each question and give our thoughts and we'll see whose ideology makes more sense?

By all means...some of the questions were not worded the best so some clarification may be in order.

Also, I'll engage this chat if you stop being a complete moron. I am not a Libertarian. I've told you this repeatedly but...you're a moron. If you can stop being you for just a short while, let's continue.

Sound fair?

 

[aCultureWarrior]

By all means...some of the questions were not worded the best so some clarification may be in order.

Also, I'll engage this chat if you stop being a complete moron. I am not a Libertarian. I've told you this repeatedly but...you're a moron. If you can stop being you for just a short while, let's continue.

Sound fair?

Even though you've been a ardent supporter of "Libertarian for life" Ron Paul and his mini-me son Rand Paul

and voted Libertarian Party you're not a Libertarian? Even though the tests that you've taken put you in the Libertarian category you're not a Libertarian?

If you want me to pretend that you're not a Libertarian, then I'll do so, but the evidence is out there. Why are you so ashamed to admit that you're for "liberty"?

On that note: Start off with the first two questions and give your answers with explanations.

 

[WizardofOz]

Even though you've been a ardent supporter of "Libertarian for life" Ron Paul and his mini-me son Rand Paul

and voted Libertarian Party you're not a Libertarian? Even though the tests that you've taken put you in the Libertarian category you're not a Libertarian?

I am not, nor have I ever been a member of the Libertarian party. Therefore, I am not a Libertarian. :duh:

Stop being such a moron.

Yes, I liked a lot of Ron Paul's ideas (Rand Paul to a much lesser degree). Yet, Ron Paul ran most recently as a Republican. Yet, I am not a Republican either. I am also not a Democrat. Because :sozo: I am not a member of any political party.

If you want me to pretend that you're not a Libertarian, then I'll do so

I want you to pretend that you are not a complete moron and are actually capable of carrying on a conversation like an adult. Give it a shot...

On that note: Start off with the first two questions and give your answers with explanations.

It' your quiz. What are the first two questions?

Maybe, oh I don't know...post them...

 

[aCultureWarrior]

I am not, nor have I ever been a member of the Libertarian party. Therefore, I am not a Libertarian. :duh:

Stop being such a moron.

One doesn't have to be a card carrying member of any organization to embrace their ideology.

Yes, I liked a lot of Ron Paul's ideas (Rand Paul to a much lesser degree). Yet, Ron Paul ran most recently as a Republican. Yet, I am not a Republican either. I am also not a Democrat. Because :sozo: I am not a member of any political party.

Yeah, what's not to like about nutcase Ron Paul, (aka Daddy Paul) who claims to be a Christian yet isn't sure if homosexuality is even a sin. Then there's Daddy Paul wanting to legalize all recreational drugs. I won't get started on his stance on virtual kiddy porn.

I want you to pretend that you are not a complete moron and are actually capable of carrying on a conversation like an adult. Give it a shot...

Not interested, for one thing I seemed to get banned whenever I have conversations with those "We want less government!" Libertarian types (if you don't see the irony in my last sentence, sleep on it and perhaps it will come to you tomorrow).

 

[Nick M]

Why does this thread exist? Why is it not terminated? Instead of fake news, the left uses TOL for fake narratives. Trad hates Trump.

Basically, here's the idea: have the government pay everyone enough money so that they start off at an above-poverty income level.

I can't express just how much I love this idea, and just how much this would pretty much solve all kinds of social problems and political debates.

Combine this with a single payer health-care system, tuition free universities and extremely tight border controls? I can't even express in words just how supremely epic that would be.

All of a sudden, the need for unions just ends.