Start with the scripture....pretty simple.
Amen.
Start with the scripture....pretty simple.
Why is it a mystery....I guess you would be right since Science cannot explain it...but we know the who, what, when and where and that's all we need to know.
Unless God's Son already exists or already existed.
Right on.....but I hope you're not misunderstanding what I am asking. Did the Jews and the Romans REALLY kill Jesus by their actions? The answer is yes they did in their hearts and minds but no in the way someone would crucify me and pierced my side.
Jesus said He laid down His own life, it was not taken from Him. There are serious theological implications in His words. The centurion could have stabbed Him a thousand times, until Jesus said it was time, He wasn't gonna die. Oh He was in agony, without a doubt. Lots and lots of pain. Probably more than any human being could sustain. But He gave up the ghost freely. It was not taken from Him. So with that said, Jesus is no ordinary human being. He was divine. They could not kill Him. He let them do the motions to think they did the deed, but they didn't. As the scriptures perfectly state, He gave Himself up for us. The perfect sacrifice. There is only one perfect being, and that is God. And Jesus is the 2nd person of the triune nature.
Jesus told Pilate that he could have no power whatsoever unless it was given to him from above. Jesus was also delivered up according to God set plan and foreknowledge.
The Messiah being cut off was prophesied by Daniel.
Disagree, His Father was God. Joseph was his parent, not progenitor.But Jesus DID have a human father and mother.
This through His mother's lineage.He is the son of Abraham and David.
Do you agree, Matthew's genealogy was messianic/kingdom, rather than paternal in nature?He also has a human genealogy leading back to Adam.
Are you referring to Hebrews 7:3?He was conceived by the Holy Spirit and thus is called the son of God. But he is also declared the son of God when he was raised from the dead and is now without human mother or father.
Tikto has a broader meaning than just 'born' thus born should be seen at least as figurative by possibility. To me, it isn't as clear of a passage (Revelation 1:5) as other passages for what you are intending to say. That is, I believe you are suggesting this term must/necessarily be 'born' and not simply 'first to rise from the dead' which is the case with the Lord Jesus Christ.He is called the firstBORN from the dead because he went out of existence when he died and needed to be BORN or come into existence again by resurrection from the dead. The definition of BORN still hold s true. I don't need to change the meaning of words so to fit my ideas. I was told along time ago that to change the meaning of a word was to make a lie. Born then, still means born today. And it still refers to coming into existence.
Yes born of a woman. But what about the virgin conception?No, I belong to no Christian sect.
I don't believed Jesus existed before he existed. He was born of a woman. And to be born of a woman means to come into existence. It's what being born means, and I can see the truth of what it means, so I don't find it necessary to change the definition of what it means.
Yes, the Word (which John says was God in John 1:1) was made flesh (John 1:14).God and Man? I don't see what you are saying here.
Jesus did NOT have a human father in the biological sense. Joseph was NOT His biological father.But Jesus DID have a human father and mother.
You are attempting to redefine terms to help your bogus story.If someone exist then he cannot be born because born means to come into existence.
Jesus did NOT have a human father in the biological sense. Joseph was NOT His biological father.
Jesus was conceived by the Holy Spirit.
You are attempting to redefine terms to help your bogus story.
Yes born of a woman. But what about the virgin conception?
That's pretty good but this one is better.Mary was caused to gift birth, or bring into existence, the promised seed/offspring of Abraham and David.
The Gentiles before receiving the gospel, were strangers to the covenants of promise, and without hope and without God.
Mary was caused to gift birth, or bring into existence, the promised seed/offspring of Abraham and David.
That's pretty good but this one is better.
Matthew:
1: 21. She will give birth to a son, and you are to give him the name Jesus, because he will save his people from their sins."
22. All this took place to fulfill what the Lord had said through the prophet:
23. "The virgin will conceive and give birth to a son, and they will call him Immanuel" (which means "God with us").
So is Joseph dream a hoax?
How is Mary a gentile? If she is from the lineage of David. Isn't she from Isreal?
Yes. Still doesn't help your cause though.
Josephs dream was not a hoax. Jesus is God with us. Jesus said that if you seen him you seen his Father(God). Simple as that.
Do you have difficulty understanding Jesus as God?
Heres' how simple it is. Jesus said "I have come in my Father's name". Now what could be more clear than that?
The words I speak are spirit and truth" said Jesus. His words are therefore the words of the Spirit which dwelt fully in him.So what was it(he) who came down from heaven? He (it) was the Spirit of the Father that DECENDED on the son. The words the son speaks are the words of the Father by the Spirit of the Father. And if the Spirit of the Father is the Father, then it was the Father, by His Spirit that came down from heaven whereby the doctrines Jesus taught were not his own (he says) but the Father's.
Neither of those two were Jesus' father.To say that Jesus is not the son of Abraham and David is to attempt to disannul what can't be disannulled
That definition does not apply to the case of God made flesh, no matter how you try to force it to.Check any good dictionary/lexicon. To be born means to come into existence. It means to enter into life.