Theology Club: How many Gospels in the Bible ?

[DAN P]

Hi to all , and there are many believers , that say , there is ONLY on Gospel !!

Covenant theology and Acts 2 , so-called Dispensationalists say that there is Only One Gospel that says How man can be saved !!

I see 6 Gospels and Paul Gospel is explained by him in 9 different ways !!

Anyone see more than One Gospel ??

dan p

 

[DAN P]

Hi to all , and there are many believers , that say , there is ONLY on Gospel !!

Covenant theology and Acts 2 , so-called Dispensationalists say that there is Only One Gospel that says How man can be saved !!

I see 6 Gospels and Paul Gospel is explained by him in 9 different ways !!

Anyone see more than One Gospel ??

dan p

Does it make any difference if there are more than on ??

If there is more than ONE is there a timeline for each ??

dan p

 

[surrender]

There has always been only one way man is saved: by grace through faith in God and His promises.

 

[godrulz]

There is only one post-cross gospel, not MAD's two. Gal. 2:7 is a demarcation of ministry, not two true gospels for a limited time.

Covenantalism and hyper-dispensationalism are flawed. Moderate dispensationalism is defensible (Acts 2).

 

[DAN P]

There is only one post-cross gospel, not MAD's two. Gal. 2:7 is a demarcation of ministry, not two true gospels for a limited time.

Covenantalism and hyper-dispensationalism are flawed. Moderate dispensationalism is defensible (Acts 2).

Hi , and you mentioned Hyper-dispensationalism !!

Covenant theology , is one gospel and Acts 2 , so why are you mentioning Acts 28 ??

Acts 28 are what is called Hyper . but begin the Body of Christ with Paul !!

Covenant and Acts 2 begin the Body of Christ on a Jewish Feast Day and it was a Prophecy in Joel 2:28 !!

The Body of Christ was a Mystery Hid is God and revealed ONLY to Paul , Rom 16:25 .

dan p

 

[DAN P]

There is only one post-cross gospel, not MAD's two. Gal. 2:7 is a demarcation of ministry, not two true gospels for a limited time.

Covenantalism and hyper-dispensationalism are flawed. Moderate dispensationalism is defensible (Acts 2).

Hi , and here is the problem that all should consider , about Acts 2 !!

If the Body of Christ began in Acts 2 , IT will include Jews and Gentiles are One !!

Then Gentiles are not seated in the Heavenlies !!

Then Jews and Gentiles , lose there INDENITY and are neither Jews NOR Gentiles , Gal 3:28 ??

dan p

 

[surrender]

Hi , and here is the problem that all should consider , about Acts 2 !!

If the Body of Christ began in Acts 2 , IT will include Jews and Gentiles are One !!

Then Gentiles are not seated in the Heavenlies !!

Then Jews and Gentiles , lose there INDENITY and are neither Jews NOR Gentiles , Gal 3:28 ??

dan p

If you really believe that Gal. 3:28 means Jews and Gentiles lose their identity, then does that mean you also believe they lose their genitals? It's a serious question. I'm guessing you still have your genitals, so maybe you think we in the Body lose them after the resurrection? Perhaps you'd like to invent another doctrine based on Gal. 3:28 and Mat. 22:30? Wait, you can't do that because Mt. 22:30 is only for Jews and Gentiles who keep their identity. Oh well.

 

[way 2 go]

There is only one post-cross gospel, not MAD's two. Gal. 2:7 is a demarcation of ministry, not two true gospels for a limited time.

Covenantalism and hyper-dispensationalism are flawed. Moderate dispensationalism is defensible (Acts 2).

so are you saying "the twelve" taught the same message as Paul ?

 

[Lighthouse]

How many Dan P threads in the MAD forum?