Hillary is like some gangsters who got away with multiple crimes without ever being charged. Why no charges? Some possibilities are crooked cops, crooked prosecutors, crooked judges, crooked politicians, crooked friends, crooked supporters, and others fearful of repercussions if they ratted her out.
Hillary is Going to Jail For Obstruction of Justice
- Thread starter Jerry Shugart
- Start date
Hillary has been in deep do do all her communist adult life and seems to thrive on getting away with crime, likely for the thrills, the financial rewards, the prestige, and the power.
How so? What exactly do you mean?
Hillary has spent years opposing and offending God so she is in great danger of being condemned to hell if she dies in her sins without turning to the Lord for forgiveness.
glorydaz
Well-known member
Durham has got her and she's going down. Main Stream Media is ignoring it. Check other sources.
The righteous do rejoice when the wicked are brought down.
Proverbs 11:10
When it goeth well with the righteous, the city rejoiceth: and when the wicked perish, there is shouting.
You mean like Fox News? Here's what they have to say about it:
Hillary did not spy on her political opponents, her crooked henchmen did.
Who has been charged with spying?
Trump was charged with colluding with Russians even though the charges were false and based upon Hillary's despicable lies. Nobody has yet been officially charged with lying to the FISA court even though dozens of public officials have admitted that someone did. And Hillary has not been charged with spying on the President of the United States even though her employees have now been publicly shamed for being implicated in the treasonous, "Worse Tnah Watergate" scandal on her behalf.
Trump called it "worse than Watergate" while Fox News stated Clinton's campaign paid to "infiltrate" his servers.
But legal analysts have told Newsweek that the document isn't the damning evidence conservatives are touting it to be.
"It's not the smoking gun that folks are saying that it is," said Neama Rahmani, a former federal prosecutor and president of West Coast Trial Lawyers. Or as Nick Akerman, a former Watergate prosecutor, put it: "It's absolute nonsense."
Is the Durham Filing the Smoking Gun That Undoes Hillary Clinton?
Trump is calling the situation "worse than Watergate" but a former federal prosecutor told Newsweek that "no one's going to be going after Hillary Clinton."
www.newsweek.com
Deceiving the FISA courts, spying on a political opponent, and spying on the President of the United States are serious offenses that have been committed no matter who democrats claim did not commit them.Trump called it "worse than Watergate" while Fox News stated Clinton's campaign paid to "infiltrate" his servers.
But legal analysts have told Newsweek that the document isn't the damning evidence conservatives are touting it to be.
"It's not the smoking gun that folks are saying that it is," said Neama Rahmani, a former federal prosecutor and president of West Coast Trial Lawyers. Or as Nick Akerman, a former Watergate prosecutor, put it: "It's absolute nonsense."
Is the Durham Filing the Smoking Gun That Undoes Hillary Clinton?
Trump is calling the situation "worse than Watergate" but a former federal prosecutor told Newsweek that "no one's going to be going after Hillary Clinton."
Obama has his dirtied hands in this whole "Worse than Watergate" spying on Trump scandal as well.
The Durham report alleges that former Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann obtained White House data through a tech executive who had legal access to that data. Although Durham didn’t accuse anyone of “spying” or “hacking,” many on the right have blown the report way out of proportion, beginning with a misleading article on FoxNews.com.
Giddy Hannity Goads Hillary to Sue Fox News for Defamation: ‘Bring It On!’
Clinton attacked the network on Thursday for its overhyped and misleading coverage of the Durham report.
www.thedailybeast.com
Democrats falsely claim the spying operation was not as bad as republicans claim. That would be the same as if Nixon claimed Watergate was not as bad as democrats claim.The Durham report alleges that former Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann obtained White House data through a tech executive who had legal access to that data. Although Durham didn’t accuse anyone of “spying” or “hacking,” many on the right have blown the report way out of proportion, beginning with a misleading article on FoxNews.com.
Giddy Hannity Goads Hillary to Sue Fox News for Defamation: ‘Bring It On!’
Clinton attacked the network on Thursday for its overhyped and misleading coverage of the Durham report.www.thedailybeast.com