ECT Hebrews ranks angels, priesthoods, covenants

Interplanner

Well-known member
Whatever is honorable, good, pure...think on these things.

I'm sure STP agrees the Bible is the written authority God wants us to have, so there is at least something to agree on.
 

Tambora

Get your armor ready!
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
Please copy anything STP says that shows there is not actually a disagreement, if you find it.
Quit being a dweeb and read it yourself.
You are ranking right up there with Meshak, with ya'lls fake "ignore" threats.
 

Interplanner

Well-known member
It's exhausting to watch IP constantly disagree with scripture.





Let's see where else did I hear people say that a Christocentric view of prophecy was exhausting?

The Servant in Isaiah is not Israel but Christ. The light in Acts 13:47 (from Isaiah) is not Israel but Christ. The covenant for the nations and light for the gentiles is not Israel but Christ... and on and on, except in Judaism and its stepchild D'ism.
 

Interplanner

Well-known member
Those things in Acts 13:47 are there because they happen in Christ. He did not mean the nation was a light to the gentiles. He meant that Israel, first, could be the light in his light. That is why Christ kept saying 'while you have the light, walk in it.' (They are the same as any other in themselves--darkness).

In the Is 40-66 study you'll see that it is not IP to blame as though he created this himself, but that even in the LXX there was already the expression that shows this Is 49:6 was about doing something greater than in Israel and that is what the apostles quoted for that purpose. It is the mission of Christ to the ends of the earth.
 

Danoh

New member
Those things in Acts 13:47 are there because they happen in Christ. He did not mean the nation was a light to the gentiles. He meant that Israel, first, could be the light in his light. That is why Christ kept saying 'while you have the light, walk in it.' (They are the same as any other in themselves--darkness).

In the Is 40-66 study you'll see that it is not IP to blame as though he created this himself, but that even in the LXX there was already the expression that shows this Is 49:6 was about doing something greater than in Israel and that is what the apostles quoted for that purpose. It is the mission of Christ to the ends of the earth.

Today's Special:

A rich, thickheaded helping of Israel's mission with a mix of the Apostle Paul's, served with a side order of Greek word salad, topped with all sorts of notions "about."

Order today and receive a Free book "about."

:chuckle:

Rom. 5:8
 

Interplanner

Well-known member
What is the deception about showing that the new covenant is here, is better and is better because Christ's blood erases sin and provides victory over death?

You are deluded to think otherwise. Ch 8 says the old has been set aside/replaced for those reasons, and that includes everything about Judaism, including the land (you can't do Judaism without the temple). You can reunify those tribes in Christ, and they are, even though the NT shows no concern at all about them.
 

SaulToPaul 2

Well-known member
Those things in Acts 13:47 are there because they happen in Christ. He did not mean the nation was a light to the gentiles. He meant that Israel, first, could be the light in his light. That is why Christ kept saying 'while you have the light, walk in it.' (They are the same as any other in themselves--darkness).

In the Is 40-66 study you'll see that it is not IP to blame as though he created this himself, but that even in the LXX there was already the expression that shows this Is 49:6 was about doing something greater than in Israel and that is what the apostles quoted for that purpose. It is the mission of Christ to the ends of the earth.

Why do you misquote Isaiah?
Who taught you to do that?
Hath God said?
 

Interplanner

Well-known member
And the misquote--what's that?

Meanwhile, you might address the 9 failures of your beliefs in that thread on D'ism. Then there would be communication.
 
Top