Global Warming er um Climate Change FRAUD
- Thread starter ok doser
- Start date
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
Updates On The Collapse Of The Climate Scam — Manhattan Contrarian
On April 14 I recorded a podcast with Tom Nelson. He has since posted a slightly edited version on his YouTube site. Go to this link if you would like to watch it — about an hour long. The main subject is the sordid history of EPA’s Endangerment Finding and efforts of people including myself to
www.manhattancontrarian.com
Too much detail to excerpt and a lot of embedded links. A deep dive if you're interested
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
For years, it worked. Journalists walked on eggshells. Scientists who questioned prevailing models did so anonymously or not at all. Free speech took a back seat to narrative control.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
Right Divider
Body part
Ice core data is generally interpreted within the paradigm of "long ages" and chemical evolution.
It is bogus.
That's an interesting point.
I've always found it baffling that so few scientists seem able to recognize the circular reasoning behind much of the ice core data interpretation. I'm not even talking about the high-profile figures who have books to sell, institutions to protect, or agendas to promote. Their bias is almost expected.
What puzzles me more are the everyday researchers, the ones actually working with the data. They, it seems to me, should, in theory, be more objective. They often seem blind to the fact that their conclusions are preloaded into their assumptions. Instead of letting the evidence lead them, they let their worldview dictate how the evidence must be understood.
You would think that every once in a while, a young scientist, fresh out of school, without a reputation to defend and who is genuinely curious would raise a hand and say, “Hold on a second. Shouldn't we be letting the data guide our theories, not the other way around?” But that seems to never happen.